calpoke25 said:
kansasCowboy said:
Cuttslam said:
More empty seats than people bother me.
So when we do become "BeaverPoke" relevant. 25+ wins a year, multiple sweet 16 appearances, maybe an nit here and there. We can constantly sellout at 10,000! And then tell our kids and grandkids about what it used to be like with 15,218 for BYU or 16,045 for Utah! And how it will never be that way again.
Or how we sellout for football at 29,000. And I'll tell my kid how awesome it was to be apart of sellouts like CSU in 97 (34,745), and how even when they bring in these damn temporary seats it still can't hit 30,000...
Small time minds.
We'd rather "look" fuller than work to "be" fuller.
Actually the trend in college athletics for the most part is downsizing and making the fan experience in person more enjoyable. Also, let's face reality, it's been over 10 years since more than 10K showed up for a Wyoming men's bball game. Our coach has a top 25 team right now and is openly frustrated with attendance. The days of simply, win and they will come are over. There is no future to be waiting on with Wyoming basketball. THIS is the year and yet we have yet to come remotely close to selling out our reduced capacity.
In the greater scheme of things no one cares whether you have 11K or 16K at a basketball game and in the greater scheme of things no one gives a F whether wyomings football capacity is 34K or 29K. The only thing that matters in the grand scheme of things is our W - L record. Go ahead and tell your kids about 16K for Utah and BYU. #1 they won't have any notion as to who those schools are anymore and #2, no one cares, not even your grandkids, if 11K or 16K show up for a basketball game 30 years later. We don't look back at games and discount them because x number of people more or less were there, we remember games based on what happened in them.
Well, I'll still say if you win, attendance rises to the point of sellouts whether in an arena 10,000 or 15,000. In the early 2ks we were on our way, till our team fell apart.
You want an example, I'll give you one in our own conf.
SDSU...
When Fisher arrived the program had many years of mediocrity and then fell into a few years of a Heath Schroyer-isk type era.
Fishers first year they were abysmal: 5-23, and their avg attend showed it. In Veijas 12,414 they brought in 2,618
Year 2: 14-14, avg 4,528
Year 3: 21-12, avg 6,165
Year 4: 16-14, avg 7,172
Year 5: 14-16, avg 6,701
Year 6: 11-18, avg 5,903
Year 7: 24-9 (what would be "their year"), avg 7,014
Year 8: 22-11, avg 7,821
Year 9: 20-13, avg 6,760
Year10: 26-10, avg 7,023
Year11: 25-9, avg 7,227
Year12: 34-3, avg 11,668
Year13: 26-8, avg 12,096
Year14: 23-11, avg 12,414 (14 years, first sellout avg)
Year15: 31-5, avg 12,414 (sellouts continue)
This year currently sold out every game!
WYO from 94-2002: similar, we had year after year of mediocrity and then began to build.
94 : 13-15, avg 8,370
95 : 14-15, avg 7,176
96 : 12-16, avg 5,368
97 : 19-9 , avg 7,084
98 : 18-10, avg 6,703
99 : 19-12, avg 7,012
00 : 20-10, avg 9,085
01 : 22-9 , avg 10,026
02 : 21-11, avg 10,108
Don't you think if we had continued along the path of success, maybe, just maybe our average attend would've continued to increase to the point of constant sellouts? Our highest year was 87 at well over 13,000 avg. I'm sure we could've surpassed that.
What about now? Let's start at 03. We fall from our winning ways and go back into mediocrity and fall even further with Schroyer, and we are now beginning to rebuild. 3 years in to a turnaround that has been stunted each year:
03 : 11-17, avg 8,201
04 : 15-13, avg 7,467
05 : 14-18, avg 5,672
06 : 17-15, avg 6,069
07 : 12-18, avg 5,262
08 : 19-14, avg 5,326
09 : 10-21, avg 4,885
10 : 10-21, avg 4,346
11 : 21-12, avg 4,955
12 : 20-14, avg 5,615
13 : 18-15, avg 5,151
14 : 16-3 , avg (going up!)
It took Steve Fisher and SDSU 11 years and five straight 20+ win seasons to get their avg attendance up past 10,000.
In the early 2ks it took us four decent seasons to get us back to 10,000 avg. Had Shyatts recruits not graduated and we had a coach who could get the same caliber of players, we could've continued to win, and our avg increased. But it didn't.
We then went through 4 years of mediocrity followed by four years of shear retarded coaching and our avg attend dropping to its lowest avg ever, two years in a row for us to gain traction again.
And surely but, sadly, slowly we have. And our avg has increased and if we continue to have success, which i believe Shyatt is every bit as good as Fisher, so I believe we will, our avg attend will increase as well.
Shyatt is currently at the same stage Fisher was from 01-07 ( you can view their records above)
He is in building mode. Once he hits sustained mode (SDSU 08-present) our attendance will skyrocket.
But for most of you, why wait for that? Let's just lose the seats we don't "currently" use so we WONT have them when we can use them.
Like I said, small mindedness, we fix the problem by "renovating" to smaller cap so we can have an amazing arena that hold significantly less. Let's appear more full by shrinking, instead of sustaining a winning tradition by going after quality coaches, to begin with, which would be utilizing those seats that you don't want us to keep.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Schroyer was a band aide hire. He was questionable at best in his career. McClain was a JUCO coach... That is not fixing the problem, our ADs didn't want to payout for a quality coach, this is what we got.
If you can prove me wrong with these numbers and info I've bestowed upon you, give it your best shot.
Oh, by the way, people do give a F about attendance at games. You ask someone what the biggest attended game they went to was, I they have never forgotten it. Especially when it was our record attendance for a game. People on here reminisce about the WYO- CSU football game on here (34,745), WYO- Utah reg season champ game 16k, and the WYO- Wisc women's Nit champ game. It is remembered. Just like 32,218 for BYU back in the day. Or 32k for Utep for the WAC champ.bNumbers matter, and they will will matter if you remember them or not.
Numbers matter to you too. Yup, you care about the lack of attendance and want to see all that wasted space go away. Either side of the arguement, numbers do and will matter.
Yes, I do think the AA needed work done to it... But to lose 5,000 seats? That's a bit much. That right there takes out the equivalent of SJSU's Civic Center cap... That my friend is down right disgusting.