I love our conference. We always have Sweet 16 threats. We need to get there and beyond. New Mexico seems to be built for a deep run every now and then, but they always lose in the first round. I hate to say it, but Eustachy's first CSU team had Final Four written all over it. If they didn't hit the Louisville buzz saw in the 2nd round, they may have gotten there. Miles built that team like Shyatt is building ours.
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!
2016 recruiting thread....
- Thread starter Cowboy Junky
- Start date
TSpoke
Well-known member
Just saying, most people involved in college basketball do not consider the MW to be a mid major. I know the MW does not consider itself a mid major. We don't take part in the bracket buster challenge(if that is still a thing) because of that. It hurt our conference losing Byu and Utah but we still have plenty of great bball programs with great history. I think this next year could be a good one for the conference. BUt yes the conference does need to step up in the tourney we have been dissapointing there.
Cosmic Cowboy
Well-known member
Check this out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Men%27s_Division_I_Tournament_bids_by_school_and_conference#Mountain_West_Conference" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
As a conference the MWC is tied in rank 9th in NCAA tourney bids. So we're fighting to get into that top 8 out of 32 conferences. Mid major has to be more of 10th-14th or 16th ranked conferences I'm assuming.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Men%27s_Division_I_Tournament_bids_by_school_and_conference#Mountain_West_Conference" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
As a conference the MWC is tied in rank 9th in NCAA tourney bids. So we're fighting to get into that top 8 out of 32 conferences. Mid major has to be more of 10th-14th or 16th ranked conferences I'm assuming.
joshvanklomp
Well-known member
Most years we are around 5-6. That's true. However, like in football, it's usually the Power 5, the mid-majors and the low majors (one-bid league).TSpoke said:
Are you saying we should be considered a Power 5 along with the likes of the Big East and Big Ten? Because I think that's absurd. Even in down years, high majors are not down around 11.
And it wasn't only last season, either. The Mountain West was 10th in 13-14 too.
Maybe there should be a second grouping between the P5s and the one-bids. If that's how you want to group it, you're right that they'd be in the higher of the two. But the MWC is not a top-5 league year in and year out.
TSpoke
Well-known member
joshvanklomp said:
There is no power 5 in basketball. So the AAC isn't a power basketball league? They recently won a national title. In fact in your quote you used a non power 5 conference in your example of power 5. Big East is not a power 5 conference. I don't know where the cut off is for a power conference but no reason it has to be 5. Its completely subjective but I would put the P5 schools, Big East, AAC, MW, and probably A10 as power conferences in basketball. Thats just off the top of my head.
Are we as good as the acc or B1G? No but are we a mid major? no. Since there isn't an intermediate group we above mid major hence a power conference.
Cowboy Junky
Well-known member
Don't be butthurt that Nodak State strives to be considered midmajor when the MWC is considered major. We didn't make the rules. 
joshvanklomp
Well-known member
Not sure what Nodak State has to do with anything. I'm a WYOMING fan on a WYOMING forum here to discus WYOMING hoops. If you would like to discuss Nodak State, I'm sure lakesbison knows some boards he can refer you to.Cowboy Junky said:Don't be butthurt that Nodak State strives to be considered midmajor when the MWC is considered major. We didn't make the rules.
joshvanklomp
Well-known member
One team does not a power conference make. Had Gordon Hayward made that halfcourt shot, would you have considered the Horizon League a Power 5 league? By your standard they would be, since they'd have a national title among them.TSpoke said:
Cowboy Junky
Well-known member
Bump. 2016 is back on. Who's it going to be?
Cowduck
Well-known member
Cowboy Junky said:
Sit on the scholarship and have three for the 2017 class. With Thompson, Stewart, and Avea high on our priority list and that crew liking each other a lot, I think we should swing for the fences with that class. I'd rather give the scholarship to a player we've been recruiting a long time and we've identified as an impact addition rather than give it to a plan B.
Cowboy Junky
Well-known member
I like Calvert, Hunte, and Diallo. I think they would all improve the Pokes.
joshvanklomp
Well-known member
Looking at the class breakdown after Washington's departure:
Seniors (2): McManamen, Marshall
Juniors (5): Lieberman, Aka Gorski, Barnes, Dalton, Herndon
Sophomores (2): James, Naughton
Freshman (5): Conway, Moemeka, Kelley (WO), Averbuck (WO), Mueller (RS?)
Seniors (2): McManamen, Marshall
Juniors (5): Lieberman, Aka Gorski, Barnes, Dalton, Herndon
Sophomores (2): James, Naughton
Freshman (5): Conway, Moemeka, Kelley (WO), Averbuck (WO), Mueller (RS?)
ItSucksToBeACSURam
Well-known member
Williams from Gillette would be HUGE for the Pokes next season. Him and Naughton could bang down low and Herndon could be more of a flex which he desperately wants to be. Get him locked up Papa Shy!
seattlecowboy
Well-known member
I would love to get Williams from Gillette but I don't think we are going to be able to unless he loves being in Wyoming. Shaka Smart was in watching him last week and so was San Diego St. He is attracting a lot of attention now. Will be another Boucher that we don't get most likely.
poke_addict
Well-known member
With Conway's scholly opening up thought I would bump this thread. I don't know what route the staff is going to go but we have two open schollys for this class now. We already have Mueller coming in this summer which I believe he will redshirt this coming season. But what should the staff do? Personally I hope we can find that 5th year guard to come in and add some depth for 16/17 season. We also have the option of saving for the 2017 class, ton of talent we are targeting in that class or possibly rewarding one of the walk on players.
Thanks for the bump. There's no way we reward a walk-on unless A)They contribute on the court and B)They're an upperclassman. I thought Shyatt might've given Bentz a scholly after Hankerson got his revoked before their senior year, but no. I assume most of the high school guys who are MWC caliber players are already signed, so the only route to go would be transfers. Maybe one who's immediately eligible like you mentioned. And maybe a transfer who needs to sit out a year. I really don't want to waste either of these 2 scholarships on a mediocre HS recruit, especially with 2017 looking so promisingpoke_addict said:
Wyolie Coyote
Well-known member
Another D1 signee from a Wyoming JUCO, Gillette College, that I don't think we pursued.
http://www.idahostatesman.com/sports/college/mountain-west/boise-state-university/extra-points-blog/article75632862.html
http://www.idahostatesman.com/sports/college/mountain-west/boise-state-university/extra-points-blog/article75632862.html
ItSucksToBeACSURam
Well-known member
This is getting old. That's 3 D1 talents the last 2 seasons right under our noses. Why are we not going after them?Wyolie Coyote said:
