ItSucksToBeACSURam
Well-known member
This is not a shit post, I am looking for honest, level headed commentary here. If the first thought here is f*ck Burman, or f*ck BYU, please go somewhere else. And no, I am not a closet BYU fan, I am not mormon. I am a UW fan through and through. I am a rabid hater of CSU, had this topic been about them, I would get it. I just don't get it about BYU.
If memory serves correctly, the announcement that BYU was leaving the MWC came while I was on a deployment to Afghanistan in late 2009/early 2010. Obviously, I had other things requiring my immediate attention. Looking back, I can't tell you where the animosity for BYU comes from. Utah left the same time but this board doesn't seem to hate the Utes like the Cougs.
Can anyone shine some light on this anger, the hurt, the frustration?
I come to this with an understanding that in college football national exposure is the name of the game. Get your name on ESPN, on ABC, on NBC, anywhere you can. The more you can, more you make. I get that.
Just because it hasn't worked for BYU doesnt mean they didnt view their jump to independence as a better opportunity for their "slice of the pie" so to speak. Any team in the G5 would make the same decision in a second if they truly believed it was an in to the P5 or national relevance.
As for the stabbing the MWC (and Wyoming specifically) in the back, is there a clause in these contracts that a team has to make decisions based on what benefits the conference? Are there buyout fees? Early termination fees? Teams leave conferences all the time for greener pastures yet few seem to get the ridicule and ire that BYU has gotten. BSU and SDSU tried with everything in their power to leave yet the conference welcomed them back and few on this board even seem to care. Why the double standard? IS there really a difference or is it just heart burn?
I am curious. Again, I am not looking for fights or name calling or any of that. Looking for history.
If memory serves correctly, the announcement that BYU was leaving the MWC came while I was on a deployment to Afghanistan in late 2009/early 2010. Obviously, I had other things requiring my immediate attention. Looking back, I can't tell you where the animosity for BYU comes from. Utah left the same time but this board doesn't seem to hate the Utes like the Cougs.
Can anyone shine some light on this anger, the hurt, the frustration?
I come to this with an understanding that in college football national exposure is the name of the game. Get your name on ESPN, on ABC, on NBC, anywhere you can. The more you can, more you make. I get that.
Just because it hasn't worked for BYU doesnt mean they didnt view their jump to independence as a better opportunity for their "slice of the pie" so to speak. Any team in the G5 would make the same decision in a second if they truly believed it was an in to the P5 or national relevance.
As for the stabbing the MWC (and Wyoming specifically) in the back, is there a clause in these contracts that a team has to make decisions based on what benefits the conference? Are there buyout fees? Early termination fees? Teams leave conferences all the time for greener pastures yet few seem to get the ridicule and ire that BYU has gotten. BSU and SDSU tried with everything in their power to leave yet the conference welcomed them back and few on this board even seem to care. Why the double standard? IS there really a difference or is it just heart burn?
I am curious. Again, I am not looking for fights or name calling or any of that. Looking for history.