POKE FAN said:Current lines for Saturday (2/21/15):
Nev (+14.0) @ BSU
AFA (+13.0) @ CS-ewe
UNLV (+3.5) @ UNM
FSU (+7.0) @ USU
SDSU (-23.0) @ SJSU
Not much in the way of potential help for the Pokes this weekend.
wyopig said:Somebody is gonna lose a weird one down the stretch.
I have to say, though, I'm rooting for Wyoming, CSU, and Boise to win out. Not only will all those wins improve our RPI, but we would finish in, at least, a 3-way tie for the MWC Championship and would secure the #2 seed. If that happened, CSU would have a secure seat in the RPI Top 25, and Boise may sneak their way up there as well. It would be nice to boast a 3-3 (or better after the MWC Tournament) record against RPI Top 25 teams going into Selection Sunday.
seattlecowboy said:wyopig said:Somebody is gonna lose a weird one down the stretch.
I have to say, though, I'm rooting for Wyoming, CSU, and Boise to win out. Not only will all those wins improve our RPI, but we would finish in, at least, a 3-way tie for the MWC Championship and would secure the #2 seed. If that happened, CSU would have a secure seat in the RPI Top 25, and Boise may sneak their way up there as well. It would be nice to boast a 3-3 (or better after the MWC Tournament) record against RPI Top 25 teams going into Selection Sunday.
I am not sure that we would get the #2 seed in that scenario. We may end up with the #1 seed.
They would look at head to head games first and since Boise would have beat SDSU twice and SDSU would have beat us twice and we would have beat Boise the only time we played them I think it would go to the next tie breaker which would be how did those teams do against the next highest team and that would be CSU. We are the only team to beat CSU both times so that would mean we win the tie breaker and get the #1 seed that is if CSU finishes in that spot . (Utah St. still has a chance at this spot)
Unless of course since us playing Boise only one time hurts us compared to SDSU and BSU playing each other twice. Not sure how they figure that part of it when one team that finishes tied at the top only plays one of the other teams one time .
TSpoke said:seattlecowboy said:wyopig said:Somebody is gonna lose a weird one down the stretch.
I have to say, though, I'm rooting for Wyoming, CSU, and Boise to win out. Not only will all those wins improve our RPI, but we would finish in, at least, a 3-way tie for the MWC Championship and would secure the #2 seed. If that happened, CSU would have a secure seat in the RPI Top 25, and Boise may sneak their way up there as well. It would be nice to boast a 3-3 (or better after the MWC Tournament) record against RPI Top 25 teams going into Selection Sunday.
I am not sure that we would get the #2 seed in that scenario. We may end up with the #1 seed.
They would look at head to head games first and since Boise would have beat SDSU twice and SDSU would have beat us twice and we would have beat Boise the only time we played them I think it would go to the next tie breaker which would be how did those teams do against the next highest team and that would be CSU. We are the only team to beat CSU both times so that would mean we win the tie breaker and get the #1 seed that is if CSU finishes in that spot . (Utah St. still has a chance at this spot)
Unless of course since us playing Boise only one time hurts us compared to SDSU and BSU playing each other twice. Not sure how they figure that part of it when one team that finishes tied at the top only plays one of the other teams one time .
I adressed this in another thread but will comment here as well. I think we would end up with the 3rd seed in htis situation. Looking at the MWC tournament website they have the seeding po;icy and it says if a 3way or more tie it fist looks at the combined recordes of everyone that is tied. BSU would be 2-1, sdsu would be 2-2 and we would be 1-2 so I would think that means BSU would get the first seed as they have a better winning percentage. After that it goes to H2H with the remain teams and we got swept by SDSU so we would be in the 3rd seed.
seattlecowboy said:TSpoke said:seattlecowboy said:wyopig said:Somebody is gonna lose a weird one down the stretch.
I have to say, though, I'm rooting for Wyoming, CSU, and Boise to win out. Not only will all those wins improve our RPI, but we would finish in, at least, a 3-way tie for the MWC Championship and would secure the #2 seed. If that happened, CSU would have a secure seat in the RPI Top 25, and Boise may sneak their way up there as well. It would be nice to boast a 3-3 (or better after the MWC Tournament) record against RPI Top 25 teams going into Selection Sunday.
I am not sure that we would get the #2 seed in that scenario. We may end up with the #1 seed.
They would look at head to head games first and since Boise would have beat SDSU twice and SDSU would have beat us twice and we would have beat Boise the only time we played them I think it would go to the next tie breaker which would be how did those teams do against the next highest team and that would be CSU. We are the only team to beat CSU both times so that would mean we win the tie breaker and get the #1 seed that is if CSU finishes in that spot . (Utah St. still has a chance at this spot)
Unless of course since us playing Boise only one time hurts us compared to SDSU and BSU playing each other twice. Not sure how they figure that part of it when one team that finishes tied at the top only plays one of the other teams one time .
I adressed this in another thread but will comment here as well. I think we would end up with the 3rd seed in htis situation. Looking at the MWC tournament website they have the seeding po;icy and it says if a 3way or more tie it fist looks at the combined recordes of everyone that is tied. BSU would be 2-1, sdsu would be 2-2 and we would be 1-2 so I would think that means BSU would get the first seed as they have a better winning percentage. After that it goes to H2H with the remain teams and we got swept by SDSU so we would be in the 3rd seed.
Yeah thanks for looking that up. I hadn't checked it yet but thought because we only played BSU one time that we may be at a disadvantage. Looks like that is the case. I think BSU will lose to SDSU anyways but whether we end up 2 or 3 doesn't matter really as we will have to play Boise St. in the semi's either way. What it will effect though is if we play either Fresno St. or UNLV in the first game.
seattlecowboy said:TSpoke said:seattlecowboy said:wyopig said:Somebody is gonna lose a weird one down the stretch.
I have to say, though, I'm rooting for Wyoming, CSU, and Boise to win out. Not only will all those wins improve our RPI, but we would finish in, at least, a 3-way tie for the MWC Championship and would secure the #2 seed. If that happened, CSU would have a secure seat in the RPI Top 25, and Boise may sneak their way up there as well. It would be nice to boast a 3-3 (or better after the MWC Tournament) record against RPI Top 25 teams going into Selection Sunday.
I am not sure that we would get the #2 seed in that scenario. We may end up with the #1 seed.
They would look at head to head games first and since Boise would have beat SDSU twice and SDSU would have beat us twice and we would have beat Boise the only time we played them I think it would go to the next tie breaker which would be how did those teams do against the next highest team and that would be CSU. We are the only team to beat CSU both times so that would mean we win the tie breaker and get the #1 seed that is if CSU finishes in that spot . (Utah St. still has a chance at this spot)
Unless of course since us playing Boise only one time hurts us compared to SDSU and BSU playing each other twice. Not sure how they figure that part of it when one team that finishes tied at the top only plays one of the other teams one time .
I adressed this in another thread but will comment here as well. I think we would end up with the 3rd seed in htis situation. Looking at the MWC tournament website they have the seeding po;icy and it says if a 3way or more tie it fist looks at the combined recordes of everyone that is tied. BSU would be 2-1, sdsu would be 2-2 and we would be 1-2 so I would think that means BSU would get the first seed as they have a better winning percentage. After that it goes to H2H with the remain teams and we got swept by SDSU so we would be in the 3rd seed.
Yeah thanks for looking that up. I hadn't checked it yet but thought because we only played BSU one time that we may be at a disadvantage. Looks like that is the case. I think BSU will lose to SDSU anyways but whether we end up 2 or 3 doesn't matter really as we will have to play Boise St. in the semi's either way. What it will effect though is if we play either Fresno St. or UNLV in the first game.
BeaverPoke said:seattlecowboy said:TSpoke said:seattlecowboy said:wyopig said:Somebody is gonna lose a weird one down the stretch.
I have to say, though, I'm rooting for Wyoming, CSU, and Boise to win out. Not only will all those wins improve our RPI, but we would finish in, at least, a 3-way tie for the MWC Championship and would secure the #2 seed. If that happened, CSU would have a secure seat in the RPI Top 25, and Boise may sneak their way up there as well. It would be nice to boast a 3-3 (or better after the MWC Tournament) record against RPI Top 25 teams going into Selection Sunday.
I am not sure that we would get the #2 seed in that scenario. We may end up with the #1 seed.
They would look at head to head games first and since Boise would have beat SDSU twice and SDSU would have beat us twice and we would have beat Boise the only time we played them I think it would go to the next tie breaker which would be how did those teams do against the next highest team and that would be CSU. We are the only team to beat CSU both times so that would mean we win the tie breaker and get the #1 seed that is if CSU finishes in that spot . (Utah St. still has a chance at this spot)
Unless of course since us playing Boise only one time hurts us compared to SDSU and BSU playing each other twice. Not sure how they figure that part of it when one team that finishes tied at the top only plays one of the other teams one time .
I adressed this in another thread but will comment here as well. I think we would end up with the 3rd seed in htis situation. Looking at the MWC tournament website they have the seeding po;icy and it says if a 3way or more tie it fist looks at the combined recordes of everyone that is tied. BSU would be 2-1, sdsu would be 2-2 and we would be 1-2 so I would think that means BSU would get the first seed as they have a better winning percentage. After that it goes to H2H with the remain teams and we got swept by SDSU so we would be in the 3rd seed.
Yeah thanks for looking that up. I hadn't checked it yet but thought because we only played BSU one time that we may be at a disadvantage. Looks like that is the case. I think BSU will lose to SDSU anyways but whether we end up 2 or 3 doesn't matter really as we will have to play Boise St. in the semi's either way. What it will effect though is if we play either Fresno St. or UNLV in the first game.
Playing Boise once isnt the disadvantage, losing to SDSU twice is.
And we own head to head vs Boise so if SDSU wins outright and us and Boise are tied we get the 2. If its a 3 way tie Boise gets the 1, sdsu the 2, wyo the 3. Meaning we wouldnt play Boise til finals but would play sdsu in semis.
TSpoke said:seattlecowboy said:TSpoke said:seattlecowboy said:wyopig said:Somebody is gonna lose a weird one down the stretch.
I have to say, though, I'm rooting for Wyoming, CSU, and Boise to win out. Not only will all those wins improve our RPI, but we would finish in, at least, a 3-way tie for the MWC Championship and would secure the #2 seed. If that happened, CSU would have a secure seat in the RPI Top 25, and Boise may sneak their way up there as well. It would be nice to boast a 3-3 (or better after the MWC Tournament) record against RPI Top 25 teams going into Selection Sunday.
I am not sure that we would get the #2 seed in that scenario. We may end up with the #1 seed.
They would look at head to head games first and since Boise would have beat SDSU twice and SDSU would have beat us twice and we would have beat Boise the only time we played them I think it would go to the next tie breaker which would be how did those teams do against the next highest team and that would be CSU. We are the only team to beat CSU both times so that would mean we win the tie breaker and get the #1 seed that is if CSU finishes in that spot . (Utah St. still has a chance at this spot)
Unless of course since us playing Boise only one time hurts us compared to SDSU and BSU playing each other twice. Not sure how they figure that part of it when one team that finishes tied at the top only plays one of the other teams one time .
I adressed this in another thread but will comment here as well. I think we would end up with the 3rd seed in htis situation. Looking at the MWC tournament website they have the seeding po;icy and it says if a 3way or more tie it fist looks at the combined recordes of everyone that is tied. BSU would be 2-1, sdsu would be 2-2 and we would be 1-2 so I would think that means BSU would get the first seed as they have a better winning percentage. After that it goes to H2H with the remain teams and we got swept by SDSU so we would be in the 3rd seed.
Yeah thanks for looking that up. I hadn't checked it yet but thought because we only played BSU one time that we may be at a disadvantage. Looks like that is the case. I think BSU will lose to SDSU anyways but whether we end up 2 or 3 doesn't matter really as we will have to play Boise St. in the semi's either way. What it will effect though is if we play either Fresno St. or UNLV in the first game.
Agreed there isn't much difference between 2 and 3 seed. It also depends on where the lower teams end up on what our matchup would be. Actually I guess there is one fairly big difference. With the 2 seed we would be playing a team that played the day befroe while the 3 seed plays the 6th seed bot hin their first game. So I think I would rather play a team that has played a game the day before but on the other hand they have already gotten used to the floor and won a game on it.