I hope Cody is right. Again, maybe it's a hedge, but the sense I got is that Peasley is only marginally better than he was last year, and the offense still sucks. It seems that an emerging excuse is the OL, which is supposed to be Bohl and Polasek's strong suit. As for Grant being able to assemble and coach up a functional WR corps, color me skeptical. He has NEVER fielded anything resembling a D1 WR array. He won't this year either. It is time for him to go. He's had his chance. Polasek should follow him if this year goes how I think it will go offensively this year. And if the D does happen to single-handedly win some games this year on their own, the O shouldn't be given a pass. Wins are great, but don't acquit Polasek, Grant and Crew for being crappy. I know that this is Bohl's scheme and he is ultimately responsible and things won't change until he does (which will never happen) - but Burman ain't firing Bohl, so the only hope we may have is his rearranging of deck chairs on the Titanic might just work once.
Merging this interview together with Bohl's, I can't imagine that Peasley will get to run this year, which is how some of us thought we might have some semblance of offensive production. The back-ups are crummy and undeveloped - so my guess is that they can't risk injury with designed runs. So, here's to a thin, crappy WR corps, half-developed OL and slightly improved Andrew Peasley to bring us to the promised land.
