• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

How many are going to the spring game?

laxwyo said:
Is there a place i should be eating at while i'm in laramie? It's been a while since I've dined in town and I'm not in the know for good places to eat.
Click to expand...

McAllisters is my go to. Close to the stadium, walking distance.
 
Itsux2beaewe said:
OrediggerPoke said:
Thoughts from the game - Svoboda has an arm.
Click to expand...

So you’re saying that even if he has talent, Bohl will still have Peasley start.
Click to expand...

Peasley did not look very good today. Stared down the receiver, ball floated and was picked off for a pick 6 (and another INT).
 
I think the defense is gonna be awesome. I picture the offense like a good Sean Chambers moment. They are gonna have to let Peasley run. Svboda can run. Let them hit throws to tight ends. But the QB is going to stare down the first option and if it’s not there run. We have two good tight ends, 3 good banged up running backs, and athletic QBs.
 
marcuswyo said:
I think the defense is gonna be awesome. I picture the offense like a good Sean Chambers moment. They are gonna have to let Peasley run. Svboda can run. Let them hit throws to tight ends. But the QB is going to stare down the first option and if it’s not there run. We have two good tight ends, 3 good banged up running backs, and athletic QBs.
Click to expand...

8 or 9 in the box will stuff the o like normal if qb can't throw. I was worried about this. OOC is a little tougher this year. Not going to run over a p5 opponent who knows what's coming
 
marcuswyo said:
I think the defense is gonna be awesome. I picture the offense like a good Sean Chambers moment. They are gonna have to let Peasley run. Svboda can run. Let them hit throws to tight ends. But the QB is going to stare down the first option and if it’s not there run. We have two good tight ends, 3 good banged up running backs, and athletic QBs.
Click to expand...

I agree with this assessment. Peasley is very fast. If he is going to be the guy, then utilize his strength (running) and give him throws with higher chances of success.
 
OrediggerPoke said:
marcuswyo said:
I think the defense is gonna be awesome. I picture the offense like a good Sean Chambers moment. They are gonna have to let Peasley run. Svboda can run. Let them hit throws to tight ends. But the QB is going to stare down the first option and if it’s not there run. We have two good tight ends, 3 good banged up running backs, and athletic QBs.
Click to expand...

I agree with this assessment. Peasley is very fast. If he is going to be the guy, then utilize his strength (running) and give him throws with higher chances of success.
Click to expand...

We already had this QB before and it didn't work.
 
Poke in New England said:
OrediggerPoke said:
I agree with this assessment. Peasley is very fast. If he is going to be the guy, then utilize his strength (running) and give him throws with higher chances of success.
Click to expand...

We already had this QB before and it didn't work.
Click to expand...

Yep. 1 dimensional is 1 dimensional no matter who is running the ball. D assignments are much easier unless you're running an offense like the triple option.

Like usual, only wins will be against teams POKES have physical advantage and the D can keep close.
 
From what I read and have been told the offense will still be 2 runs up the middle or off tackle, followed by an incomplete pass. God this getting tiring.
 
doreno5 said:
From what I read and have been told the offense will still be 2 runs up the middle or off tackle, followed by an incomplete pass. God this getting tiring.
Click to expand...

10 years in and people were believing Bohl's BS about a changed offense. A tiger doesn't change its stripes. Our receiving corps is terrible and our QB is subpar. I like Peasley, but he is not even a mid-tier D1 prospect. Until Grant gets the boot as the WR coach and we bring in a true QB coach, and not an O-line guy that we fit into the spot, we are a .500 squad.
 
LawPoke said:
doreno5 said:
From what I read and have been told the offense will still be 2 runs up the middle or off tackle, followed by an incomplete pass. God this getting tiring.
Click to expand...

10 years in and people were believing Bohl's BS about a changed offense. A tiger doesn't change its stripes. Our receiving corps is terrible and our QB is subpar. I like Peasley, but he is not even a mid-tier D1 prospect. Until Grant gets the boot as the WR coach and we bring in a true QB coach, and not an O-line guy that we fit into the spot, we are a .500 squad.
Click to expand...
It's unreal how bad the coaching staff is on offense.
 
LanderPoke said:
LawPoke said:
10 years in and people were believing Bohl's BS about a changed offense. A tiger doesn't change its stripes. Our receiving corps is terrible and our QB is subpar. I like Peasley, but he is not even a mid-tier D1 prospect. Until Grant gets the boot as the WR coach and we bring in a true QB coach, and not an O-line guy that we fit into the spot, we are a .500 squad.
Click to expand...
It's unreal how bad the coaching staff is on offense.
Click to expand...

It's mind boggling. At this point, it's clear as day that Josh Allen was the nut a bunch of blind squirrels found. He succeeded despite this system, not because of it. The fact he found success in this system is a real testament of his ability.

Hell, the staff needs to start promoting this. We have developed the most rigorous qb evaluation program ever. Few, if any, will ever make it. However, if you can rise to the occasion to complete 56% of your passes for 200 yards per game, you are destined to a hall of fame nfl career.
 
doreno5 said:
From what I read and have been told the offense will still be 2 runs up the middle or off tackle, followed by an incomplete pass. God this getting tiring.
Click to expand...

Easy solution...injuries to our top 4 running backs and pretty much only walk-ons left and lack of tackle depth. Forced to pass then. At the spring game, there were twice as many throws as runs because I believe only one or two scholarship running backs received carries and because we were so thin at tackle that the tackles were playing all-time offense.
 
I didn’t think it was a good sign Peasely was ordained starter and still don’t. We essentially know what we have. He had a lot of bad games and gets a pass. Clemons comes in and beats CSU and has a bad game against BSU and gets the hook. Peasely had multiple bad games like Clemons had against BSU. It’s a bad sign when Svoboda and Clemons aren’t pushing to replace a lower mid QB.
 
laxwyo said:
I didn’t think it was a good sign Peasely was ordained starter and still don’t. We essentially know what we have. He had a lot of bad games and gets a pass. Clemons comes in and beats CSU and has a bad game against BSU and gets the hook. Peasely had multiple bad games like Clemons had against BSU. It’s a bad sign when Svoboda and Clemons aren’t pushing to replace a lower mid QB.
Click to expand...

I believe Svoboda is pushing Peasley. Bohl has sung Svoboda's praises all Spring and he was clearly at least the #2 guy at the end of Spring (Clemons got no snaps with the #1 offense while Svoboda played for both teams in the scrimmage). Anyone that watched that Svoboda laser of a throw in the wind knows he is the more talented passer. Clemons is clearly not the answer.

But we all know (barring injury) that Peasley will be the starter come fall. However, I think his leash might be shorter than QBs have seen in previous years. This reminds me a lot of the Cam Coffman/Josh Allen situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top