3 points on 4 turnovers is inexcusable. UW made $1M, defense was overall much improved, special teams were special, and that game was winnable. The drop off in skill positions was greater than anticipated, that hurt. Running outside the A gap on short yardage plays is not exactly a difficult adjustment to make, eliminating the read option against a disciplined defense isnt hard, and throwing a slant instead of an out route would at least be running somewhat north/south for the receivers. Vanilla play calling and watered down game plan makes no fing sense. It was a frustrating game telling the boob tube to not run up the middle or throw 20 yds to a receiver within 5 yds of the line of scrimmage, and then seeing those exact plays happen. I do think vigen is capable, but that was the most conservative play calling ive seen since a jr high game. In a winnable ooc game that could have stepped this team up, i dont like seeing 3 pts on 4 turnovers. Their defense was good and disciplined. They kept 2 deep and we only got behind them 1 time and the wr shit his pants. The qb rollouts didnt work because they were fast and stayed home. Fire vigen no....bash him relentlessly, absolutely. With a stud qb, he couldnt set us up for any success, the play calling was horrid, but that game was winnable. Expecting more from our offense with a qb like that against a middling b1g team is not unreasonable, especially with 4 tos, from a potential mw conferrnce contender. G5 teams typically need some wrinkle of surprise to win against the p5, all i want to see is throws farther than 5 yds downfield. Rant over.