OrediggerPoke
Well-known member
Might want to add:Even if Wyoming were to pull out a win, I am and will still be pissed about the decision. *Unless we beat them 70 to 0. For me, it isn't necessarily about *winning the game, it is how the deal was done.
I.E.
•Giving CSewe a 7th home game for revenue purposes alone...
•Giving CSewe a home opener vs. WYO to celebrate their new Conference and new Coach
•Giving up a home game (and all the revenue) against a better opponent (North Texas)
•Keeping CSewe from getting their ass handed to them by Indiana (and tank their season)
1) Handing over the media rights to the game to the PAC and CSU for exactly $0 in compensation. The game is now being widely promoted as the PAC’s first televised game with its new network partner USA Network.
2) Screwing over Wyoming season ticket holders by getting rid of pretty much the only desirable home game.
3) doing all of this while CSU and the PAC are actively suing Wyoming and refusing to pay the exit fees they long ago agreed to pay as a member of the MWC.
So my question is - were there any side oral assurances coming out of Fort Collins and the PAC to take care of Burman (or others) as part of this very one sided deal?