• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Agreement reached on exit and poaching fees

But this isn't really addressing what happened. The Pac 12 was gutted with 2 schools remaining. The MWC put them on life-support by scheduling 2025 games based upon a no poaching agreement. CSU secretly conspired with OSU and WSU with malice intended toward remaining MWC schools (and then bitched about scheduling Grand Canyon). This wasn't some innocent break up. This was a dirty affair by CSU that came to light. I'd be ashamed of UW if the roles were reversed. CSU prostituted itself. PAC could care less about CSU...they wanted BSU, SDSU, UNLV, and FSU. CSU has never done anything to show they deserve a better conference opportunity.
Burman failed UW monumentally by ditching our 2026 home game against North Texas, so we could play an away game at CSewe (oh, and it allowed CSewe to avoid the inevitable ass kicking in Indiana). Which likely would have spiraled them into a shit season in 2026. That is THE slap in the face in my opinion.
 
Burman failed UW monumentally by ditching our 2026 home game against North Texas, so we could play an away game at CSewe (oh, and it allowed CSewe to avoid the inevitable ass kicking in Indiana). Which likely would have spiraled them into a shit season in 2026. That is THE slap in the face in my opinion.
1000% agree with you. Burman should be compelled to provide his reasoning. Makes no sense at all.
 
Am I the only one that thinks this "package deal" idea is insane? This is not the first time I've seen it mentioned on this board.

Why would CSU owe Wyoming anything? If CSU perceives the move to another conference as a "step up", why would they hurt their chances at seizing that opportunity by tying themselves to UW?

I would be pretty pissed off if UW were offered to move to a better conference and we turned it down because they wouldn't take CSU too. It all just seems mildly embarrassing to expect that CSU should be the one lifting us up with them as they move on.
It’s pretty naive to think the defecting schools were not having conversations with one another prior to making their decision to bolt. They were all sure clamoring for UNLV to join them and still may be. I didn’t write previously that it would have been a deal breaker for CSewe. I just would have had more respect for them had they been pushing to have their biggest rival join them in the move.

The PAC Stabbers conference looks better on paper but if a couple of schools bolt to another conference and a few more leave the MWC, we could easily be back in the same conference with CSewe.
 
All of the pearl clutching about “PAC stabbers” and “defectors” is a little silly to me. There’s no moral dimension here. Nobody “owes” Wyoming anything, and the schools left behind in modern college athletics aren’t being cheated so much as losing a market competition they were never positioned to win.

That doesn’t mean everything inside Wyoming has been handled well...it clearly hasn’t. Administrative mistakes, complacency, and a failure to adapt have absolutely made a difficult situation worse. But even if UW had been run far more effectively over the last 20+ years, the broader structural forces pushing schools like Wyoming toward the margins would still exist.

We may not like that reality, but it is reality. Forces far outside the borders of Wyoming now have more influence over the fate of UW athletics than anything happening inside the state.

College athletics has been a “what can you get away with?” environment for a long time. Schools maneuver for money, exposure, recruiting access, and survival. CSU didn’t betray some sacred covenant....they acted in what they believed was their institutional self-interest. Do not kid yourself....Wyoming would have done the exact same thing if the roles were reversed.

The uncomfortable truth is that UW simply doesn’t bring much leverage to the table right now. Historically, the one way programs like Wyoming could overcome structural disadvantages was through sustained competitive excellence and stability inside an amateur model that still allowed room for disruption (The Boise State pathway). But the sport has moved further and further toward a professionalized system where structural advantages compound instead of flatten out.

That doesn’t mean UW should give up. But I think people are misdiagnosing the problem if they think this came down to loyalty, betrayal, or CSU being uniquely immoral.
 
Back
Top