Does anyone really believe that ESPN wants to pay CSU, AFA, UAB, Temple, ECU, USF, Navy, Tulsa, Memphis, and UConn.......7 milllion dollars each per season for the rights to broadcast their games? There's no way they're going to get that.
There's a clause in the AAC contract that allows ESPN to re-negotiate the t.v. deal if the AAC loses the following 4 markets: UConn, Houston, Cincinnati, and UCF. All those teams are gone. The new rumor is that UCONN will be invited back for football only to by-pass that clause. I don't know if that's true, but you can bet your ass that's what Aresco is telling CSU and AFA, that they're going to be getting 7 million a year without Boise and SDSU. I just can't see that happening.
Supposedly, there are a lot of people in Colorado Springs and the U.S. Air Force that aren't crazy about this either. They can't see sacrificing everything they've built in this part of the country for a chance at a possible increase in revenue. Powerful boosters are against the move. The one thing I know about AFA is that one reason they want a move is to free up an out of conference game. Since they're required to play Navy and Army every year, they don't have flexibility with their schedule. Wouldn't it be really simple for the MWC to just allow AFA to play one less conference game per year and use winning percentage to determine who gets in the conference championship game?
The more I'm reading about this, the harder it is getting for me to believe this is going to work for the AAC. The more I'm learning about this, the more I believe that we'll lose AFA at the most. CSU, not a chance.
The other thing I've learned: a lot of Gonzaga fans want in the MWC now that BYU is gone. Regardless of what happens with CSU and AFA, the MWC needs to go get Gonzaga.