ragtimejoe1
Well-known member
Wyo2dal said:games against some of the weakest teams at the FBS level.
For the most part, that sums up our entire schedule sans about 4 games.
Wyo2dal said:games against some of the weakest teams at the FBS level.
OrediggerPoke said:My biggest worry going forward...Jones in coverage against Oregon![]()
ragtimejoe1 said:OrediggerPoke said:My biggest worry going forward...Jones in coverage against Oregon![]()
Oregon game is a worst-case scenario. Even on their bad day, they are lots better than us. Their D is going to dismantle us. They have speed everywhere. Praying they have a bit of a letdown game otherwise, we might have 500+ yards put on us and not even generate a 100 yards from our O.
I'm just hoping to escape both Oregon and MSU injury free.
Fixed it for ya. LOLVisorHair said:ragtimejoe1 said:OrediggerPoke said:My biggest worry going forward...Jones in coverage against Oregon![]()
Oregon game is a worst-case scenario. Even on their bad day, they are lots better than us. Their D is going to dismantle us. They have speed everywhere. Praying they have a bit of a letdown game otherwise, we might have 500+ yards put on us and not even generate a 100 yards from our O.
I'm just hoping to escape both Oregon and MSU injury free.
We may get boat raced. Like.. Bohl might fight the urge to Joe Glenn the Oregon sideline. :shock:
Adv8RU12 said:Before everybody gets too excited, lets put things in perspective:
1) Last week 17 points offense. This week 17 points: NO OFFENSIVE IMPROVEMENT.
2) Last week 12 points allowed. This week 13 allowed: DEFENSE GOING BACKWARD.
:lol: :lol:
Wyo2dal said:Adv8RU12 said:Before everybody gets too excited, lets put things in perspective:
1) Last week 17 points offense. This week 17 points: NO OFFENSIVE IMPROVEMENT.
2) Last week 12 points allowed. This week 13 allowed: DEFENSE GOING BACKWARD.
:lol: :lol:
I can't agree with this, The defense didn't go backwards the secondary has been a worry the entire time and the offense looked better against Air Force, Kirk didn't make any drastic mistakes and there were no turnovers. You can't just look at the score and numbers and make blanket statements that they are going backwards and not improving.
I hope you knew that was a joke, right?Wyo2dal said:Adv8RU12 said:Before everybody gets too excited, lets put things in perspective:
1) Last week 17 points offense. This week 17 points: NO OFFENSIVE IMPROVEMENT.
2) Last week 12 points allowed. This week 13 allowed: DEFENSE GOING BACKWARD.
:lol: :lol:
I can't agree with this, The defense didn't go backwards the secondary has been a worry the entire time and the offense looked better against Air Force, Kirk didn't make any drastic mistakes and there were no turnovers. You can't just look at the score and numbers and make blanket statements that they are going backwards and not improving.
Wyo2dal said:joshvanklomp said:Why not?mwc fan said:Honestly we can't continue at this pace.
Who not? please don't tell me you are being serious. This team isn't a play from behind team. Going down by 3 is one thing and the defense has really won these last two games against some of the weakest teams at the FBS level.
And repeated 3 and outs...yopaulie said:Wyo2dal said:joshvanklomp said:Why not?mwc fan said:Honestly we can't continue at this pace.
Who not? please don't tell me you are being serious. This team isn't a play from behind team. Going down by 3 is one thing and the defense has really won these last two games against some of the weakest teams at the FBS level.
=================
Define "pace". Of course the goal isn't to fall behind. But everyone should get use to this style - the first halves will be close and slower starting. Leads may be small or non-existent at halftime because both teams are still fresh, and no one worn down. This will be the case even when Bohl improves the talent. Even though the running game never materialized (just don't have the talent on the O-line), AFA defense did fatigue enough, had some cramps, and their pass rush weakened. That is the style and the pace everyone will see going forward.
gbpoke said:Wyo2dal said:Adv8RU12 said:Before everybody gets too excited, lets put things in perspective:
1) Last week 17 points offense. This week 17 points: NO OFFENSIVE IMPROVEMENT.
2) Last week 12 points allowed. This week 13 allowed: DEFENSE GOING BACKWARD.
:lol: :lol:
I can't agree with this, The defense didn't go backwards the secondary has been a worry the entire time and the offense looked better against Air Force, Kirk didn't make any drastic mistakes and there were no turnovers. You can't just look at the score and numbers and make blanket statements that they are going backwards and not improving.
No doubt about it. How many times in the past would Air Force put up 250-300 rushing yards on us? I for one am very impressed with this new defense. Certainly there needs to be improvement in the defensive backfield, but the front 7 can be completely dominate. Hopefully the offense will eventually be able to consistently put longer drives together where the defense can sit on the sidelines and get some rest to stay fresh. On a side note, its almost impossible to get a running game going when there are 7-9 defensive players in the box.
yopaulie said:Wyo2dal said:joshvanklomp said:Why not?mwc fan said:Honestly we can't continue at this pace.
Who not? please don't tell me you are being serious. This team isn't a play from behind team. Going down by 3 is one thing and the defense has really won these last two games against some of the weakest teams at the FBS level.
=================
Define "pace". Of course the goal isn't to fall behind. But everyone should get use to this style - the first halves will be close and slower starting. Leads may be small or non-existent at halftime because both teams are still fresh, and no one worn down. This will be the case even when Bohl improves the talent. Even though the running game never materialized (just don't have the talent on the O-line), AFA defense did fatigue enough, had some cramps, and their pass rush weakened. That is the style and the pace everyone will see going forward.
Of course it's not a play-from-behind team. But how many teams are? How many teams are better when playing from behind versus playing with the lead?Wyo2dal said:joshvanklomp said:Why not?mwc fan said:Honestly we can't continue at this pace.
Who not? please don't tell me you are being serious. This team isn't a play from behind team. Going down by 3 is one thing and the defense has really won these last two games against some of the weakest teams at the FBS level.
wyoforever said:Not much option for Bohl at QB at this point. Thornton and Young would be a drop off from Colby. Fort and Smith are redshirting. Next year will be interesting with Cam, Fort, Smith in the mix competing with Thornton and Young.
We will have to be patient with Colby for this year but he is getting better every game. That last drive showed he has a lot of heart and he can make the throws. This season could get very interesting as the season goes on.
WestWYOPoke said:wyoforever said:Not much option for Bohl at QB at this point. Thornton and Young would be a drop off from Colby. Fort and Smith are redshirting. Next year will be interesting with Cam, Fort, Smith in the mix competing with Thornton and Young.
We will have to be patient with Colby for this year but he is getting better every game. That last drive showed he has a lot of heart and he can make the throws. This season could get very interesting as the season goes on.
Of course Fort and Smith aren't just red shirting for kicks, if they were better than Colby they'd be starting I'm sure.