ItSucksToBeACSURam
Well-known member
Our basketball team looks so lost....WTF is happening....
Totally agree with all of the latter comments. We played much better the end of the first half and all of the second half. With Grabau hitting shots, Nance being Nance, Adams being a spark, and the rest at the very least not being a liability, we look like we could compete again. We are a good team when we are hitting on all cylinders but when we miss-fire, we are a terrible team. Hope we see more second half team and less of the first half team. Good win and good god Nance is a stud.
kansasCowboy said:This team barely beat S. Dakota in ot. We struggled with BLACK HILLS ST!!! Struggled with 4-7 Jackson St. And a Denver team we should've taken care of beat us. We'll be lucky to be a seventh place finish this year. Maybe another 21-15 type year... 20 wins is great, right? Not when we suck in conference and we are still losing almost as many games as we did under Schroyer.
If you don't think that is improvement, I don't know what to say.
marcuswyo said:If you don't think that is improvement, I don't know what to say.
No improvement in conference finishes compared to schroyer. That has to be a concern of any fan.
There is improvement, it's just modest. I think the RPI tells the tale though. The MWC was very tough the last two years compared to historical averages. The opposite is true in FB. We have to recognize that Shyatt's teams were quite a bit better than Heath's and that DC's 2013 team was worse than anything Joe Glenn did. SOS tells the tale.
I am probably one of the more negative posters I suppose, but objectively Shyatt has improved the program. My main concern is that we don't appear to have a high ceiling under Shyatt because of the level of athlete that is being recruited. I see us stuck in a CBI/CIT kind of rut, but that is a dramatic improvement from being in the bottom third of D-1 like we were under Schroyer.
marcuswyo said:There is improvement, it's just modest. I think the RPI tells the tale though. The MWC was very tough the last two years compared to historical averages. The opposite is true in FB. We have to recognize that Shyatt's teams were quite a bit better than Heath's and that DC's 2013 team was worse than anything Joe Glenn did. SOS tells the tale.
I am probably one of the more negative posters I suppose, but objectively Shyatt has improved the program. My main concern is that we don't appear to have a high ceiling under Shyatt because of the level of athlete that is being recruited. I see us stuck in a CBI/CIT kind of rut, but that is a dramatic improvement from being in the bottom third of D-1 like we were under Schroyer.
To be fair the MW was a grossly overrated conference last year( see tournament results) so RPI can be misleading. I'm not sure the conference was stronger last year, but even if it was Shyatt didn't deliver an above average team. The BYU and Utah teams schroyer played were decent. The Provo douches had the NCAA player of the year during the schroyer years. At this poit Shyatt hasn't done much, and he seems to be unable to recruit a scoring guard (a Ewing, Jones, or Richardson).
As far as football I don't disagree that Glenn had a harder schedule, but it doesn't matter. DC and Glenn both didn't deliver, and had nearly identical results. Again, both won bowl games with the help of players they didn't recruit. I really liked Glenn as a coach but it is obvious that DC brought in Better skill players. Glenn benefitted from a legit superstar in Bouknight.