kansasCowboy said:
No, I'm calling you out on how you come on to constantly complain how WYO does so bad, and flip about the fan base, and athletic dept, and try to use our rival as an example of how to do it, because their one legit year is proof that they are leaving us in the dust. Each one of those points I've argued with you on as well as many others. But if we use your "other favorite" team (who is eerily similar) as an example of the same things, it's casually nothing to you, and isn't the same.
You complain that CSUs new stadium is them leaving us in the dust. Yet we continue to rennovate our stadium and build better facilities. Who's chasing who? Damn, we even have a pro team interested in our indoor practice facility! They completely bypassed Fort Collins for that one, didn't they?
You complain about our fan base, yet we all watched OSU take on ASU and noticed quite an empty stadium. Kudos on the win, but going back to the point, you brushed it off as fans came in late in the game. Not true. They continually showed stadium shots throughout the entire game... Pretty sparse. I don't care what they announced there. It looked more like 25k in a 45k stadium. That's the equivelant of 15k in the War.
I generally agree with you, but this year, not so much.
Lol :thumb:
First of all, the Denver Broncos didn't look at the IPF, they looked at the FieldHouse, the building that's been there for how many years? They were interested in the design of the FieldHouse. It has nothing to do with Wyo having superior football facilities. Even if they did like our IPF, does it mean that because they chose us we have better facilities than Bama or Texas? Come on. That's an irrelevant thing to hold our hats on. "Here recruits, the Broncos like our IPF, sweet huh?"
And don't take my word for it, but there was far more than 25K at that OSU-ASU game. There was far more than 35K too. But nope, you are right, because you saw parts of the stadium on TV, you know better. And the fact you think Oregon State and Wyoming are eerily similar when the lowest attendance for the Beavers this season was over 40K, and has won far more games over the past 7 years as I pointed out, is laughable. I posted the records from the last 7 seasons and while the Beavers certainly aren't the Ducks, they are far from being at the level Wyoming is. But here is the thing, you act like I am here to talk about how the Beavers are better than the Pokes; I'm not. You get upset, say the Beavs suck, so I explain why they don't. "Eerily similar" Lol.
Also, let's look at one more thing, let's say, since you know better than someone who was actually at the game, that the Beavers had 25K show up for the ASU game. That's your ONLY game you can pick on. The Beavers loaded the stadium for the Portland State, San Diego State, Utah (thursday night), Cal, Wazzu, and Oregon games.
I do enjoy that my points get to you so bad you go onto bitch about the Beavers anytime you disagree with me though. I'm glad I have that effect on you.
The only thing similar the Beavers and Cowboys have going for them right now is that they both have a rivalry with the team in green down south.
But let's get back to the Wyo season not being a failure; which it absolutely was. 4-8 is a failure. No ifs ands or buts about it.
What world is it a success?
Bohl lost to CSU, USU, and Hawaii. All of which are "rivalries" with trophies.
We had a 5th year QB, who showed some guts, but couldn't find a wide open WR in the endzone to win a game.
We did find a bright spot in Brian Hill. That kid is going to be fun in the future.
It's good that May can move to the defense without hurting our RB depth.
We gave up 36.67 ppg last season, compared to 32.83 ppg this season. That is a definite improvement. About 4ppg, let's call that a TD every other game. Not great, but I do see the improvement. The first few games out of the gate showed some promise, but last season they did too, only to see it crash and burn. Just like this season.
The MWC was down this season more than ever before. People used to pick apart DC for his SOS compared to Glenns saying the MWC was tougher under Glenn than it was under DC. Which was true, but if you are going to say that about DC, you better say it about Bohl. The MWC was more down this season than any year under DC. Yet DC still won a bowl game year 1.
Bright spots here: We blew out Fresno State. Brian Hill. Glimpses of the future with a good defense, and solid run game.
That is all there is.
Now, if you want to talk about CSU making an effort to turn around their program as compared to ours, to me it all starts with the AD. They had their vision, and got it going. We are stuck with the used car salesman. Sure CSU has only had 1 10win season. We haven't done that in 20 years.
CSU had a coach leave because he left for the SEC. We have coaches leave because they get fired. They are building a new stadium. I don't care if they are playing catch up right now, it's an arms race, and in todays world of college football, the newest stuff is the nicest stuff. Recruits don't care that we have already had this or that, when CSU has a brand new this or that. CSU isn't the great next thing by any means, but they are trying to be, and I applaud them for that. I would rather us shoot for our dreams and crash and fail instead of cautiously saying "Jeez I don't know about that".
They show some fire, and we don't. That's where I feel about CSU leaving us behind. Their mentality is the one leaving us behind. They are in the 21st century and we are sitting behind mocking them not being complacent.