• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

WAC in trouble of staying relevant?

MrTitleist

Administrator
Staff member
This is going to get me flamed by Okie, but that's okay.

The WAC, as you all know, lost Boise State. Boise State has carried that conference over the last 10 years. Since 2000 the Broncos have won the conference seven times. Absurd! In those seven years the Broncos have lost one... ONE freaking conference game. Now that the Broncos, the face of the WAC is gone, who's going to carry the flag for that conference? More importantly, how is that WAC going to stay relevant and on anyone's radar? The WAC HAS to expand.. they have no choice. They can't lose Boise State and just say, "oh well, ho hum." Right now the WAC, as I see it, is a complete toss-up. In 2012 I honestly have no idea who could win that conference.. I would say it's anyone's game except NMSU, USU, and SJSU. But that's not a good thing.. there's no single dominant team in that conference past Boise. Fresno is the closest you've got, but in years past they've really just been plodding along w/ 4-5 losses per season. Hawaii has spectacular season in the last 10, and enjoy the benefit of playing most of their games at home.

So what I'm getting at.. what does the WAC do? They have to expand.. who do they take in? Million dollar question. I don't see Houston moving from CUSA to the WAC. This leaves FCS teams.. does the WAC gamble its reputation on FCS schools? I don't see them having any choice. On their list is Montana, Sacramento State, Portland State, Texas State, Texas-San Antonio, and Lamar. Maybe Cal Poly. UTSA and Lamar are just starting their teams this season, but UTSA already has games vs. Arizona, AZ St, and another couple BCS teams scheduled (2015/16'ish).

Montana seems like a great choice, but the Missoula TV market is not exactly a big one, but the Griz have a very loyal and very well traveling fan base all over the West. Plus Montana's running low on cash to make the move.

Texas State would help, but need some facilities improvements.

Sacramento State would bring a nice TV market, but no one in Sacramento cares about the Hornets.. I'm not even sure that Hornet students care about the Hornets. Weird commuter school.. but they sponsor a ton of athletics teams, a few of which are part of the WAC already. But hard to get people to watch the Hornets with UC-Davis, Cal, and Stanford close by.

Portland State would be a great TV market, and have the facilities for the WAC (basketball would have to move to a diff arena). Plus it would keep the WAC in the Pacific Northwest, important recruiting area. But.. like SacSt, no one cares about the Vikings in Portland.. their focus is on Oregon and Oregon State. Also a commuter school.

UTSA would be a great get for the WAC. New program, so unproven, but you get a Texas TV market, a great football stadium, and a ton of potential. However, they aren't ready for the WAC yet. Lamar falls here too.

Cal Poly.. nice facilities, but a small TV market. I really don't know too much about the Mustangs other than they come to Missoula every other year and get beat. But.. would Poly become a full WAC member, their basketball I believe is played in the Great West. You could lump UC-Davis in here too.

Soooo... what's the WAC to do?
 
Eh, Boise State joined the WAC in 2001, not in 2000. Otherwise, great post.

The only WAC school I feel sorry for is Hawaii since I got friends there.
 
Wyokie said:
Eh, Boise State joined the WAC in 2001, not in 2000. Otherwise, great post.

The only WAC school I feel sorry for is Hawaii since I got friends there.

I didn't say anything about when Boise joined, I used a 10 year time period to make my point. :) 7 times in 9 years sounds wonky.
 
http://www.rgj.com/article/20100612/SPORTS06/6120316/1018/SPORTS
Montana

» The Grizzlies are perhaps the most attractive possibility, but it would probably take some convincing to get them to move to the FBS. Montana has balked at such opportunities in the past. If a second WAC school were to leave (Louisiana Tech?), the WAC might be able to convince Montana and Montana State to come on board.

Sounds like Reno paper wants UM, but I think the scenario they propose is a pipe dream at best. I don't think UM is ready to move-up, despite the cries for change on egriz, and with that in mind, the Bobcats are NO WHERE CLOSE TO READY (unless the expansion video becomes a reality in two years). Looks like the WAC is SOL and will be no more in a few years.
 
Back
Top