carbonpoke
Well-known member
you can exempt folks to get more subscriptions... or try too. however, the people you are targeting, diehards from this site, and other sports locals that don't want to pay (or cant pay), we will still remain.
we don't need the rivals site. in fact, I don't use yahoo for scouting.
its not that good. espn is better, if you can believe that?
hudl, 247, maxpreps, and scout, provide better informastion than rivals.
Harley kirsch, teven Jenkins. they are making 0 dollars for you right now, but we already now about them.
elitism is still roman.
rivals has fewer viewers, and even less now. bad effing idea to lock out readers. most of the viewers on your sight don't subscribe. you guys had the Wyoming site first, but have lost connectivity. fans in Wyoming want to express opinions the same way that you introduced the rivals site 15 years ago. but whatever. charge more, see how that goes.
remember sam Walton?
free to play. way better.
then charge the advertisers. not the customers
we don't need the rivals site. in fact, I don't use yahoo for scouting.
its not that good. espn is better, if you can believe that?
hudl, 247, maxpreps, and scout, provide better informastion than rivals.
Harley kirsch, teven Jenkins. they are making 0 dollars for you right now, but we already now about them.
elitism is still roman.
rivals has fewer viewers, and even less now. bad effing idea to lock out readers. most of the viewers on your sight don't subscribe. you guys had the Wyoming site first, but have lost connectivity. fans in Wyoming want to express opinions the same way that you introduced the rivals site 15 years ago. but whatever. charge more, see how that goes.
remember sam Walton?
free to play. way better.
then charge the advertisers. not the customers