fromolwyoming said:Read about it on the MWC board. Though, placing the MWC #3 against ACC #7, I'm not quite sure about that matchup.
Cheywypoke said:fromolwyoming said:Read about it on the MWC board. Though, placing the MWC #3 against ACC #7, I'm not quite sure about that matchup.
No disrespet fromolwyoming, but yoiu're starting to sound like that whiney poster Yoda from Fresno. I say we (UW/MWC) play whoever they match us up with and kick their ass.
It's 350 miles from New Orleans to Shreveport.MrTitleist said:New Orleans would probably be a pretty easy flight to do too.. then a quick drive to Shreveport
This is what I meant. #3 beats the ACC #7, didn't prove anything much unless our #3 was unranked and their's was in the top 25-30 somehow. And if the ACC #7 beats the MWC #3, then that will only go to discredit us. If it was more like #3 vs #4 or around those lines, I wouldn't have nearly as much chargrin with it. But the way ot os panning out, it is basically kicking sand in our faces saying that the top of the conference is only as good as the lower tier of the ACC.Asmodeanreborn said:Cheywypoke said:fromolwyoming said:Read about it on the MWC board. Though, placing the MWC #3 against ACC #7, I'm not quite sure about that matchup.
No disrespet fromolwyoming, but yoiu're starting to sound like that whiney poster Yoda from Fresno. I say we (UW/MWC) play whoever they match us up with and kick their ass.
I kind of feel he has a point, though. IF our #3 loses to the ACC #7, it makes MWC look VERY bad, while a win proves absolutely nothing. a #3 vs a #4 or #3 vs a #5 is a wash... but #7?
fromolwyoming said:This is what I meant. #3 beats the ACC #7, didn't prove anything much unless our #3 was unranked and their's was in the top 25-30 somehow. And if the ACC #7 beats the MWC #3, then that will only go to discredit us. If it was more like #3 vs #4 or around those lines, I wouldn't have nearly as much chargrin with it. But the way ot os panning out, it is basically kicking sand in our faces saying that the top of the conference is only as good as the lower tier of the ACC.Asmodeanreborn said:Cheywypoke said:fromolwyoming said:Read about it on the MWC board. Though, placing the MWC #3 against ACC #7, I'm not quite sure about that matchup.
No disrespet fromolwyoming, but yoiu're starting to sound like that whiney poster Yoda from Fresno. I say we (UW/MWC) play whoever they match us up with and kick their ass.
I kind of feel he has a point, though. IF our #3 loses to the ACC #7, it makes MWC look VERY bad, while a win proves absolutely nothing. a #3 vs a #4 or #3 vs a #5 is a wash... but #7?
The Road said:Here is a piece I did on Shreveport back in October. Seems like a fun place to go for a weekend.
http://cowboyaltitude.blogspot.com/2009/10/getting-to-know-shreveport-la.html
WYCowboy said:There was a weatherman (can't remember his name) from the KCWY13 TV station in Casper that transferred to Shreveport just a couple of weeks before Katrina hit. He said the weather was too boring in Wyoming. I'm not sure if he went to a TV station there or to a National Weather Service office.