ragtimejoe1
Well-known member
Harsh, I know.
.
With all due respect, man, not really harsh at all. I doubt he cares at all about your opinion on the matter.
Harsh, I know.
.
ragtimejoe1 said:Harsh, I know.
.
With all due respect, man, not really harsh at all. I doubt he cares at all about your opinion on the matter.
BeaverPoke said:Let's not forget that, that list of 9 NFL players from Wyoming is bigger than it has ever been right now. That could be a good thing or a bad thing.
Good thing? Wyo has produced that much recently.
Bad thing? That's not "normal" for Wyo, who normally has far less.
As for CU, who has 14, over 150% more than Wyo, has been terrible for a decade and still has put that many in the NFL.
BeaverPoke said:Is it just me or is Dino making me want to see Bartlett end up somewhere else?
Of course, I really want him to be a Poke, but seeing Dino post this nonsense only to be wrong would just be the best thing I've seen since ACS stiff-armed that CSU cornerback.
BeaverPoke said:Is it just me or is Dino making me want to see Bartlett end up somewhere else?
Of course, I really want him to be a Poke, but seeing Dino post this nonsense only to be wrong would just be the best thing I've seen since ACS stiff-armed that CSU cornerback.
NowherePoke said:BeaverPoke said:Let's not forget that, that list of 9 NFL players from Wyoming is bigger than it has ever been right now. That could be a good thing or a bad thing.
Good thing? Wyo has produced that much recently.
Bad thing? That's not "normal" for Wyo, who normally has far less.
As for CU, who has 14, over 150% more than Wyo, has been terrible for a decade and still has put that many in the NFL.
What leads to that gap though (14 vs. 9)? Is it because CU does a better job developing players? Is it because the PAC provides more exposure? Or, is it because they recruit more NFL caliber athletes?
If you consider the fact we basically never beat CU for a recruit, it's pretty amazing that the difference isn't like 20 to 1. Fact of the matter is that the stakes are high in the NFL and NBA and they don't miss on very much talent, especially at the FBS level. The MWC has proven it can generate enough exposure to produce a number 1 pick in both sports (on multiple occasions for the NBA). The larger conferences produce more professional talent primarily due to the fact that they recruit that caliber of athlete.
Long story short, if you are a NFL level talent playing in the FBS, the NFL (or at least agents) will find you and you will have opportunities, so make your college decision based on other factors (best fit, etc.).