Pokemus Prime
Active member
Our running game is much improved this year. I'm not sure TCU has as much of an edge there as in years past.
In the past, when I watched TCU's front seven play it took only a few minutes for me to be completely terrified of playing them. They were as good as anyone. This TCU defense doesn't even come close. Their secondary is worse than its ever been under the modern era with Patterson.Pokemus Prime said:Our running game is much improved this year. I'm not sure TCU has as much of an edge there as in years past.
J-Rod said:In the past, when I watched TCU's front seven play it took only a few minutes for me to be completely terrified of playing them. They were as good as anyone. This TCU defense doesn't even come close. Their secondary is worse than its ever been under the modern era with Patterson.Pokemus Prime said:Our running game is much improved this year. I'm not sure TCU has as much of an edge there as in years past.
Adv8RU12 said:1) SDSU figured out how to stop Pokes in second half. Pokes got minus one yard 4th quarter.
2) TCU allows only 11 pts per conf. game. So defensive coaching is top notch - better than SDSU.
3) Conclusion: Game mainly TCU defensive coaching vs. Poke offensive coaching. Advantage TCU.
4) Wild card: Weather. Bad weather will FAVOR TCU because a) the warm-weather boys will realize that this
is a problem and get the adrenaline flowing. b) the Poke passing game will be hampered, c) the TCU
running game not so much.
Wyoirish said:Jesus. Maybe we should cancel?
I agree, I think we can move the ball on them just like we did in the first half of SDSU. However, if weather forces this into a grinding ground game, while I think we can run the ball on them, I don't know if our D-line can withstand that for four quarters unless the offense can sustain some drives and give them rest.J-Rod said:In the past, when I watched TCU's front seven play it took only a few minutes for me to be completely terrified of playing them. They were as good as anyone. This TCU defense doesn't even come close. Their secondary is worse than its ever been under the modern era with Patterson.Pokemus Prime said:Our running game is much improved this year. I'm not sure TCU has as much of an edge there as in years past.
J-Rod said:High of 26, low of 15....70% chance of snow. Gonna be fun to watch.....at home of course!!! Dress warm folks.....look forward to seeing thousands of brown and gold Panda's!
BackHarlowRoad said:Just throwing this out there, our last "snow" game, the incredibly cold New Mexico game in 2009, both teams combined to THROW for nearly 500 yards.
calpoke25 said:I'm not sure how much of an advantage it is for it to be cold. A lot of Wyoming's players come from warm weather states. How many of them really have played in these kind of conditions, especially now with the IPF? Sure they live in them but playing in them is different. 2 years ago against New Mexico maybe? When has Brett Smith played in these conditions? Never?
I hope it is an advantage because we need every bit we can get against TCU, but I'm not sure it helps much. Both teams will be affected IMO. I remember SDSU coming in here in a mighty winter storm and pounding us like it was a day at the beach, granted that was the Koening days.