• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Reflection on the season

Brown and Gold said:
I think that if Josh Allen had not been injured, we'd be 9-3 and there'd be a great push to see an Allen/Rosen showdown in Arizona in a bowl. Having said that, we lost two easily winnable games due to this injury and it makes us feel like this year was worse than last. The difference this year was focused on Allen and the QB position but the true difference wasn't Allen, it was Brian Hill......

Our defense played well and was way better than last year. Brian Hill made our opponents play run first and that allowed for Josh Allen to emerge as a force. As last year progressed, our team went to Allen as our first option and defense's focused then on Allen and guess what, he struggled in every game from New Mexico on.

Same thing this year, teams focus on Allen and not the run....they know we can't run the ball and it is easy to stop Josh. Brian Hill brought fear into opponents minds and when Josh Allen became the man.....we lost our mojo....

Now.... before you get off base, go back and look at Allen's stats from New Mexico on...... Losing Hill as our go-to was our downfall and losing him to the NFL was the death of Josh Allen as a huge impact player. Hill would have changed everything and we'd maybe be 10-2 now.

I see this year as progress because I think that the Allen injury screwed us. Yeah we should be able to beat SJSU with me at QB but with Allen, we beat both SJSU and Fresno State easily in my opinion. I see us as a 9-3 team really. Anytime you lose big time players, it's tough, especially when you lose your QB or RB early to the NFL. For us, it's worse than other schools because we don't have four star kids just glad to wait for a shot. In BB when we lost Nance, Adams wasn't the same and it seems like we may never recover but we have. In FB, it was hard to replace Brett Smith but we did. Who will be the next stud for us? I doubt the sky is falling.

Josh was one of the leading scorers in the nation the year after Larry. He was incredibly fun to watch his Senior season. I totally agree with your point though. I honestly didn't know what we were going to do without Leonard Washington then Larry grew out of his baby giraffe body and the rest was history.
 
Let me clarify about Adams, I was trying to make the point of not winning and if I remember correctly, he was scoring a great deal from the free throw line. I'm not saying that he wasn't good but it was tough for him. But yeah... just look at Adams and Nance.... seems like we're starting to get our mojo back from their loss. We will be ok. I'm not saying that Bohl is Lombardi but he was an Allen injury away from being 9-3 after an 8 win season. Everyone has injuries but when you lose your best player on offense who is your QB.... you rarely win. I think that our program is fine. Let's hope we get a new OC and that our new QB will be an up and coming stud. Our defense will be there.
 
poke_addict said:
bladerunnr said:
I'm glad everyone's giving Bohl a pass. If he had put this team in the conference that had BYU, Utah, and Boise state, we would not have been 7-5. He's never had to play TCU, and Boise state is on a downward trend since Peterson left. We only beat one team with a winning record (csewe). I don't say we should get rid of him, but I'm not ready to anoint him as the next Vince Lombardi. This team won a number of close games that could have gone the other way. We've had some of the worst losses in school history with Bohl. I think next year without Allen will be very interesting.

I will take a pass on this year's bowl game. Hey JC in the Rock, you wanted the Nick Smith era to start. You happy now?
Haven't seen anyone on here compare Bohl to Lombardi. We also lost some close games that could have gone the other way.

I have to remember that posters on this board don't understand sarcasm. I don't recall us losing a single close game that could have gone the other way. Boise st. beat us by 10 and could have been more. SJS had us down 10 and we scored a garbage td. Same with Fresno st. . But ok, you can think we were in those games if you believe it. Pretty stupid though. Meanwhile, Hawaii took us to overtime, we were losing to Utah st. late in the 4 qtr, and we were losing to csewe in the 4 qtr.
 
bladerunnr said:
poke_addict said:
bladerunnr said:
I'm glad everyone's giving Bohl a pass. If he had put this team in the conference that had BYU, Utah, and Boise state, we would not have been 7-5. He's never had to play TCU, and Boise state is on a downward trend since Peterson left. We only beat one team with a winning record (csewe). I don't say we should get rid of him, but I'm not ready to anoint him as the next Vince Lombardi. This team won a number of close games that could have gone the other way. We've had some of the worst losses in school history with Bohl. I think next year without Allen will be very interesting.

I will take a pass on this year's bowl game. Hey JC in the Rock, you wanted the Nick Smith era to start. You happy now?
Haven't seen anyone on here compare Bohl to Lombardi. We also lost some close games that could have gone the other way.

I have to remember that posters on this board don't understand sarcasm. I don't recall us losing a single close game that could have gone the other way. Boise st. beat us by 10 and could have been more. SJS had us down 10 and we scored a garbage td. Same with Fresno st. . But ok, you can think we were in those games if you believe it. Pretty stupid though. Meanwhile, Hawaii took us to overtime, we were losing to Utah st. late in the 4 qtr, and we were losing to csewe in the 4 qtr.

Lol we were beating Boise in the 4th Fresno literally came down to the last play of the game. Pretty stupid you're right.
Do you even know what garage time is? The game can't still be in question to be considered garbage time.
 
I feel like our receivers are a great receivers coach away from understanding how to get speration on the field.

Not sure who is coaching them but my guess it's a positional coach pulling double duty.

We need a dedicated receivers coach that is experienced as a receiver and I'm not sure we have one and if we do he isn't doing a very good job.

Overall I'm absolutely amazed with the defensive effort all year and can't wait to see them a year more mature.
 
Wyo2dal said:
I feel like our receivers are a great receivers coach away from understanding how to get speration on the field.

Not sure who is coaching them but my guess it's a positional coach pulling double duty.

We need a dedicated receivers coach that is experienced as a receiver and I'm not sure we have one and if we do he isn't doing a very good job.

Overall I'm absolutely amazed with the defensive effort all year and can't wait to see them a year more mature.

Mike Grant is our wide receivers coach and is only coaching the wide receivers. He was their coach last year as well. He coached wide recievers and running backs at North Texas prior to coming to UW and played quarterback at Nebraska in the late 80s.

http://gowyo.com/coaches.aspx?rc=111&path=football
 
OrediggerPoke said:
wyoair said:
Mike Grant is our wide receivers coach and is only coaching the white receivers.
http://gowyo.com/coaches.aspx?rc=111&path=football

What!?!? I am hoping you mean "wide receivers".

Yeah I meant wide. Auto-correct is a bitch sometimes.
 
Honestly, though, here's how our offense went in the second half against SJSU:
First drive:
1st and 10 at WYO 25
(15:00 - 3rd) Nick Smith pass complete to James Price for 10 yds to the Wyom 35 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WYO 35
(15:00 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for 7 yds to the Wyom 42
2nd and 3 at WYO 42
(15:00 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for 4 yds to the Wyom 46 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WYO 46
(15:00 - 3rd) Austin Conway run for 1 yd to the Wyom 47
2nd and 9 at WYO 47
(15:00 - 3rd) Kellen Overstreet run for 5 yds to the SJSt 48
3rd and 4 at SJSU 48
(15:00 - 3rd) Kellen Overstreet run for 33 yds to the SJSt 15 for a 1ST down play
1st and 10 at SJSU 15
(15:00 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for a loss of 3 yards to the SJSt 18
2nd and 13 at SJSU 18
(15:00 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for 2 yds to the SJSt 16
3rd and 11 at SJSU 16
(15:00 - 3rd) Nick Smith pass complete to Josh Harshman for 5 yds to the SJSt 11
4th and 6 at SJSU 11
(10:24 - 3rd) Cooper Rothe 28 yd FG GOOD

So... looking great, and then Woods comes in with two terrible runs, and then we go for a pass play well short of the sticks. WTF?

Next one:
1st and 10 at WYO 42
(8:39 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for 2 yds to the Wyom 44
2nd and 8 at WYO 44
(8:39 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for no gain to the Wyom 44
3rd and 8 at WYO 44
(8:39 - 3rd) Nick Smith run for 12 yds to the SJSt 44 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at SJSU 44
(8:39 - 3rd) Kellen Overstreet run for 2 yds to the SJSt 42
2nd and 8 at SJSU 42
(8:39 - 3rd) Nick Smith pass incomplete to James Price, broken up by Dakari Monroe
3rd and 8 at SJSU 42
(8:39 - 3rd) Nick Smith pass incomplete to C.J. Johnson
4th and 8 at SJSU 42
(8:39 - 3rd) Tim Zaleski punt for 25 yds, fair catch by Thai Cottrell at the SJSt 17

Overstreet's the hot hand, yet Woods gets the first series. We only convert because Smith runs for 12.

Next:
1st and 10 at WYO 34
(4:59 - 3rd) Kellen Overstreet run for 3 yds to the Wyom 37
2nd and 7 at WYO 37
(4:59 - 3rd) Nick Smith pass complete to Austin Fort for a loss of 1 yard to the Wyom 36
3rd and 8 at WYO 36
(4:59 - 3rd) Nick Smith pass incomplete to Austin Conway, broken up by Maurice McKnight
4th and 8 at WYO 36
(4:59 - 3rd) Tim Zaleski punt for 40 yds , Thai Cottrell returns for no gain to the SJSt 24

Once again, pass that has no way of making it anywhere on second down. Yes, Fort can break tackles, but when he's covered and is set up to receive behind the line of scrimmage? Whyyyyy?

1st and 10 at WYO 11
(2:09 - 3rd) Nick Smith pass complete to Austin Conway for 9 yds to the Wyom 20
2nd and 1 at WYO 20
(2:09 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for 2 yds to the Wyom 22 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WYO 22
(2:09 - 3rd) Kellen Overstreet run for 38 yds to the SJSt 40 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at SJSU 40
(2:09 - 3rd) Trey Woods run for 8 yds to the SJSt 32
2nd and 2 at SJSU 32
(2:09 - 3rd) WOODS, Trey rush right for 2 yards to the SJ30 (GINDA, Frank;CHACHERE, Andre), PENALTY WY holding (RUSH, Gavin) 10 yards to the SJ42, NO PLAY.
2nd and 12 at SJSU 42
(2:09 - 3rd) Nick Smith sacked by Jamal Scott for a loss of 3 yards to the SJSt 45
End of 3rd Quarter
3rd and 15 at SJSU 45
(15:00 - 4th) Nick Smith pass incomplete to C.J. Johnson
4th and 15 at SJSU 45
(15:00 - 4th) Tim Zaleski punt for 45 yds for a touchback

This one, Rush took us out of what would've been field goal range with a couple of average Overstreet runs (even at 2-3 yard gains), and the sack didn't help things.


Aaaand Next:

1st and 10 at WYO 17
(12:59 - 4th) Kellen Overstreet run for 8 yds to the Wyom 25
2nd and 2 at WYO 25
(12:59 - 4th) Kellen Overstreet run for 3 yds to the Wyom 28 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WYO 28
(12:59 - 4th) Kellen Overstreet run for 7 yds to the Wyom 35
2nd and 3 at WYO 35
(12:59 - 4th) Nick Smith pass incomplete to Jaylon Watson
3rd and 3 at WYO 35
(12:59 - 4th) SAN JOSÉ ST Penalty, personal foul (Andre Chachere) to the 50 yard line for a 1ST down
play
1st and 10 at 50
(12:59 - 4th) Kellen Overstreet run for 13 yds to the SJSt 37 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at SJSU 37
(12:59 - 4th) Kellen Overstreet run for 4 yds to the SJSt 33
2nd and 6 at SJSU 33
(12:59 - 4th) Kellen Overstreet run for 3 yds to the SJSt 30
3rd and 3 at SJSU 30
(12:59 - 4th) Kellen Overstreet run for a loss of 3 yards to the SJSt 33
4th and 6 at SJSU 33
(8:53 - 4th) Cooper Rothe 49 yd FG MISSED

Overstreet does great, and then we call a run out wide without blocking? Even a zero gain up the middle would've made the FG attempt long enough. Overall, this drive showed we could move the ball on the ground with Overstreet, though!

BUUUT... then we abandoned the run:
1st and 10 at WYO 38
(7:18 - 4th) Nick Smith pass complete to Austin Conway for a loss of 6 yards to the Wyom 32
2nd and 16 at WYO 32
(7:18 - 4th) Nick Smith pass incomplete to James Price
3rd and 16 at WYO 32
(7:18 - 4th) Nick Smith sacked by Owen Roberts for a loss of 5 yards to the Wyom 27
4th and 21 at WYO 27
(7:18 - 4th) Tim Zaleski punt for 39 yds, fair catch by Thai Cottrell at the SJSt 34

You know the rest...
 
My point of that post: yes, if Smith is even semi-decent with his passing and has a few completions, the outcome of the game is different. It still feels as if things would've gone differently with even more Overstreet, though. I don't necessarily mind calling plays where he runs to the edge, but you've got to actually block for plays like that. His loss run and one of his short runs were both calls like that which simply had no blocking, and one or two unblocked defenders got to him instantly.

I was encouraged by what I saw from him, though. He'll be a junior next season, and he'll fully trust his knee game one - plus, he should be even stronger. It's not entirely out of the question that he'll play at 225 lbs rather than the 216 he started this season at. But then again, are we even going to use him as much as his play deserves?
 
Asmodeanreborn said:
My point of that post: yes, if Smith is even semi-decent with his passing and has a few completions, the outcome of the game is different. It still feels as if things would've gone differently with even more Overstreet, though. I don't necessarily mind calling plays where he runs to the edge, but you've got to actually block for plays like that. His loss run and one of his short runs were both calls like that which simply had no blocking, and one or two unblocked defenders got to him instantly.

I was encouraged by what I saw from him, though. He'll be a junior next season, and he'll fully trust his knee game one - plus, he should be even stronger. It's not entirely out of the question that he'll play at 225 lbs rather than the 216 he started this season at. But then again, are we even going to use him as much as his play deserves?

That's what pisses me off most. I can't find any logical explanation for why you don't use your player who is giving you what offensive spark you have. Its almost like Vigen tries too hard or makes things too complicated for himself. Lately he has been getting too cute with things like the Border War when we were at the 1 yard line and instead of Josh getting the call I believe a sweep was called to Woods and we lose 4 or 5 yards.
 
my biggest thing is if something isn't working DON'T go back to it, if something is working DON'T shy away from it, isn't this Football 101???
 
stymeman said:
my biggest thing is if something isn't working DON'T go back to it, if something is working DON'T shy away from it, isn't this Football 101???

I mean, it's one thing to adjust as the other team is adjusting to what's working... but when it continues to work and they can't stop it, maybe continue until they prove they can stop it? I honestly think Overstreet would've run it into the endzone himself on a couple of those drives if we had just let him continue to cruise up the middle... and I'm not a huge fan of those up-the-middle runs in general, but when they work because the other team can't get in the holes fast enough (unless Woods is running)? Just do it!
 
Asmodeanreborn said:
stymeman said:
my biggest thing is if something isn't working DON'T go back to it, if something is working DON'T shy away from it, isn't this Football 101???

I mean, it's one thing to adjust as the other team is adjusting to what's working... but when it continues to work and they can't stop it, maybe continue until they prove they can stop it? I honestly think Overstreet would've run it into the endzone himself on a couple of those drives if we had just let him continue to cruise up the middle... and I'm not a huge fan of those up-the-middle runs in general, but when they work because the other team can't get in the holes fast enough (unless Woods is running)? Just do it!
This was the most perplexing turn of events of all of them. The coaches have been bitching about wanting to establish a run game all year. We finally get one and find a back who was kicking ass and they never went back to him in the 4th. He broke that huge run late in the third and I don't think he had but 1 or 2 more touches after that... It was craziness
 
I'm pretty sure that the WR coach teaches them how to separate. I'm positive that they work on the same type of drills and skills that all football coaches do in college programs across the nation. We have capable players, they just need to grow in the program. We have to remember that Allen was throwing to seniors last year and had a running back that kept the secondary looking into the backfield for a second. Playing time pays off and each season focuses players for strength and conditioning and skill development in the off season.
 
ItSucksToBeACSURam said:
Asmodeanreborn said:
stymeman said:
my biggest thing is if something isn't working DON'T go back to it, if something is working DON'T shy away from it, isn't this Football 101???

I mean, it's one thing to adjust as the other team is adjusting to what's working... but when it continues to work and they can't stop it, maybe continue until they prove they can stop it? I honestly think Overstreet would've run it into the endzone himself on a couple of those drives if we had just let him continue to cruise up the middle... and I'm not a huge fan of those up-the-middle runs in general, but when they work because the other team can't get in the holes fast enough (unless Woods is running)? Just do it!
This was the most perplexing turn of events of all of them. The coaches have been bitching about wanting to establish a run game all year. We finally get one and find a back who was kicking ass and they never went back to him in the 4th. He broke that huge run late in the third and I don't think he had but 1 or 2 more touches after that... It was craziness

Seems like a long time ago now, but I'm pretty sure the run was working very well when we were up 21 at AF too and Vigen unnecessarily called that weird double pass that likely ended JA's college career. Pfft!
 
I think Vigen's offense is largely built on the assumption that the offense will have better, more disciplined players that win the 1 on 1 matchup.

The spread tries to get players in space and offset talent discrepancies. It seemed like a lot of Peterson's offenses at BSU (in their really good years) would overload the area they were trying to get the ball to.

I need to go back and look at recordings so correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Vigen's o predicated on winning 1 on 1 vs overloading point of attack, creating mismatches, etc.?
 
Vigens Offense is predicated on the 1960 Ohio State Playbook
Three yards and a cloud of Turf. He has no Scheme- No feeling
If he has much better talent his team will succeed- If not watch out.
 
The power run plays must work in practice or they would not be using them. The same plays that were successfully used at NDSU. So it is likely the players or the coaching, or a combination of both. I was talking to the local high school offensive line coach about the lack of power run offense. He commented that the struggles are not unexpected with a freshman center no matter how much potential he has. Which brings up the question why was not there a center already in the pipeline in year 4 that could step in?

I would expect there will be changes in the offensive coaching staff, with the replacement(s) probably being coaches Bohl has closely worked with in the past.
 
CodyPoke said:
The power run plays must work in practice or they would not be using them. The same plays that were successfully used at NDSU. So it is likely the players or the coaching, or a combination of both. I was talking to the local high school offensive line coach about the lack of power run offense. He commented that the struggles are not unexpected with a freshman center no matter how much potential he has. Which brings up the question why was not there a center already in the pipeline in year 4 that could step in?

I would expect there will be changes in the offensive coaching staff, with the replacement(s) probably being coaches Bohl has closely worked with in the past.
I too think we will see a shake up of offensive coaching personnel this offseason. Bohl cannot be happy with how his offense performed.

Anyone heard any names of who may be looked at for Strength coach? I know the listing says the job doesnt start until January 1 but would be interested in any names being brought up.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top