Since we went with option #1 the last time we played them (two late bombs away td's for Weber), I'm thinking we should put the pedal to the metal.McPeachy said:If UW gets up, say 3 scores (17 points)...it could go either way:
1. We either settle into the possession / protection game, and let them back in the game (final score close)
2. We stomp on the gas and polish the machine (a complete blowout).
I am hoping for option 2.
JimmyDimes said:Since we went with option #1 the last time we played them (two late bombs away td's for Weber), I'm thinking we should put the pedal to the metal.McPeachy said:If UW gets up, say 3 scores (17 points)...it could go either way:
1. We either settle into the possession / protection game, and let them back in the game (final score close)
2. We stomp on the gas and polish the machine (a complete blowout).
I am hoping for option 2.
Go Pokes!!
mrtnt3x said:JimmyDimes said:Since we went with option #1 the last time we played them (two late bombs away td's for Weber), I'm thinking we should put the pedal to the metal.McPeachy said:If UW gets up, say 3 scores (17 points)...it could go either way:
1. We either settle into the possession / protection game, and let them back in the game (final score close)
2. We stomp on the gas and polish the machine (a complete blowout).
I am hoping for option 2.
Go Pokes!!
+1, that is one thing the CDC has over Cowboy Joe Glenn, CDC has a heavier foot per say. It always seemed that Joe would let off the gas a little early and let teams back in it. ie TCU '07, Weber, just to name a few
weberwildcat said:weber wont be as good as '09 is probab an accurate estimation. what about wyo? how does this yr compare to that yr? better/worse/?
kansasCowboy said:weberwildcat said:weber wont be as good as '09 is probab an accurate estimation. what about wyo? how does this yr compare to that yr? better/worse/?
Far better in comparison. In 09 we had no RB's to speak of coming in that year. This year we have returning starter and depth. 09 we had no top notch WR coming in. Leonard became the man. Have depth and big play potential in Ogbanna, McNeill and a few TE's. Smith is in my opinion better than ACS or Benjamin.
09 DL was good. 11 DL should be about the same. LB's just as good as 09 if not better. CB's about the same, SS's about the same. K's should be about the same also. OL is yet to be determined. But i think we are better there also than we were in 09.
mrtnt3x said:JimmyDimes said:Since we went with option #1 the last time we played them (two late bombs away td's for Weber), I'm thinking we should put the pedal to the metal.McPeachy said:If UW gets up, say 3 scores (17 points)...it could go either way:
1. We either settle into the possession / protection game, and let them back in the game (final score close)
2. We stomp on the gas and polish the machine (a complete blowout).
I am hoping for option 2.
Go Pokes!!
+1, that is one thing the CDC has over Cowboy Joe Glenn, CDC has a heavier foot per say. It always seemed that Joe would let off the gas a little early and let teams back in it. ie TCU '07, Weber, just to name a few
JimmyDimes said:Since we went with option #1 the last time we played them (two late bombs away td's for Weber), I'm thinking we should put the pedal to the metal.McPeachy said:If UW gets up, say 3 scores (17 points)...it could go either way:
1. We either settle into the possession / protection game, and let them back in the game (final score close)
2. We stomp on the gas and polish the machine (a complete blowout).
I am hoping for option 2.
Go Pokes!!
Eh... a couple 4th quarter bombs against our 3rd string. That game was nowhere close to what the score shows.weberwildcat said:JimmyDimes said:Since we went with option #1 the last time we played them (two late bombs away td's for Weber), I'm thinking we should put the pedal to the metal.McPeachy said:If UW gets up, say 3 scores (17 points)...it could go either way:
1. We either settle into the possession / protection game, and let them back in the game (final score close)
2. We stomp on the gas and polish the machine (a complete blowout).
I am hoping for option 2.
Go Pokes!!
weber really should have won that game, yikes we threw like 7 picks and lost by 7, what an embarrassing game.
Still though........FCS school + 7 INTs should = clown-stomping their asses. A 7 point win is unacceptable, especially considering Wyoming only beat SUU by 7 as well and NDSU by 2 a few years back. Wyoming should be clobbering these FCS schools.Subcanis said:Eh... a couple 4th quarter bombs against our 3rd string. That game was nowhere close to what the score shows.
Our '09 team was scrappy. If it weren't for a couple gutsy 4th quarters '09 would look a lot more like last year. Our D was amazing in the bowl game.weberwildcat said:kansasCowboy said:weberwildcat said:weber wont be as good as '09 is probab an accurate estimation. what about wyo? how does this yr compare to that yr? better/worse/?
Far better in comparison. In 09 we had no RB's to speak of coming in that year. This year we have returning starter and depth. 09 we had no top notch WR coming in. Leonard became the man. Have depth and big play potential in Ogbanna, McNeill and a few TE's. Smith is in my opinion better than ACS or Benjamin.
09 DL was good. 11 DL should be about the same. LB's just as good as 09 if not better. CB's about the same, SS's about the same. K's should be about the same also. OL is yet to be determined. But i think we are better there also than we were in 09.
your 09 was a pretty good team, 7 wins i believe. you guys are thinking more than 7 wins or just that team would get beat by your 2011 team?
True story. I'm not intending to laud our offense the last few years. It was atrocious. Just meant to point out that the game wasn't as close as the score. I'd be ecstatic if we could finally start putting up the huge numbers we should be.J-Rod said:Still though........FCS school + 7 INTs should = clown-stomping their asses. A 7 point win is unacceptable, especially considering Wyoming only beat SUU by 7 as well and NDSU by 2 a few years back. Wyoming should be clobbering these FCS schools.Subcanis said:Eh... a couple 4th quarter bombs against our 3rd string. That game was nowhere close to what the score shows.
Subcanis said:True story. I'm not intending to laud our offense the last few years. It was atrocious. Just meant to point out that the game wasn't as close as the score. I'd be ecstatic if we could finally start putting up the huge numbers we should be.J-Rod said:Still though........FCS school + 7 INTs should = clown-stomping their asses. A 7 point win is unacceptable, especially considering Wyoming only beat SUU by 7 as well and NDSU by 2 a few years back. Wyoming should be clobbering these FCS schools.Subcanis said:Eh... a couple 4th quarter bombs against our 3rd string. That game was nowhere close to what the score shows.
Weber: if its not too much to ask, could you please throw us another 7 ints this year? ;-)