BeaverPoke
Well-known member
Wyo2dal said:BeaverPoke said:Wyo2Dal...
Wyoming lost to AFA by 1 point with Jason Thompson starting.
You really don't think we score more points with Brett starting?
The Cal Poly game we lost with Kirkgaard starting. We don't score another TD and win that game?
Bull.
That puts that 2012 team to 6 wins.
The Toledo and Nevada games are the only ones up for grabs.
Look we got the shit kicked out of us by a number of teams with Brett so having him doesn't say we automatically win and you can't convince me of that no matter hard how you try.
I feel like Shyatt is more deserving for what he has proven and how has started turning the program around. I don't feel like DC deserved an extension and the comparison between DC and Shyatt in my opinion isn't a good comparison. No matter what stats you throw at me it's not going to change my mind and we didn't automatically beat anyone because Brett was there.
Does one person make an impact absolutely I agree 100% but the leader of a Basketball team where only 5 guys are on the court and present is completely different for Football where there are 22 guys and no one plays both offense and defense.
Now if we lost a game because we didn't have Ruffran/Miller & Yarbrough/Huff I would consider that closer to how impactful Nance is on the court. I won't say one person can't win a Football game because we saw Brett do a shitload as just one person.
What one person in Football can't do is contribute to both defense and offense like in Basketball.
No amount of statistical data is going to make me think comparing Larry Shyatt to Dave Christensen is an equal comparison.
I get what you're saying but at the same time, the QB holds the most power on the field.
Look at the Colts when Peyton was out that season. They went from 12 wins a year for the previous decade to a 2 win team.
Then they get Luck and are magically a good team again.
The QB is just 1 of 22, but that 1 is a lot more important than any 1 RB or 1 WR or 1 O-Lineman.
But as for Shyatt, I think he deserves it about the same as DC did (which he really didn't at the time).
DC won MWC coach of the year, had 2 bowl teams in 3 seasons and was 3-0 against the Sheep.
Things were trending upward, with very limited accolades to show for it.
Same thing as Shyatt. Things are trending upwards, but there aren't many accolades to show for it.
Had Brett not gotten hurt we go to another 1 or 2 bowls.
Had Luke not fucked up (Why didn't Shyatt make the season a dry-season like Bohl is doing) and Larry not gotten hurt we may have 2 Big Dance appearances right now.
I guess what I am getting at, is that when DC was extended he had accomplished a little but the trend was getting better, which is really the exact same thing as Shyatt, but I will say that Shyatts possible "what-if" ceiling is much higher, and where he can take us is much higher than what DC could have done.
Let's say we do go to bowl games the last two seasons, odds are at least 1 of those is the NM Bowl again, and maybe 1 better.
Don't get me wrong here, I would rather have 2 back to back big dances, even NITs than be playing our 13th game in ABQ every season, I just don't think that as of NOW, Shyatt really deserves it.
We can get on DC for not having the depth to replace Brett. But where is the depth to replace Larry and Luke?
I have good faith that this will NOT screw us over like DC or Schroyer did. I think Shyatt rights this ship and we may even be MWC champs this season if Larry plays.
I just want to re-iterate, as of NOW, I don't see much difference between DC and Shyatts first 3 seasons, but the Shyatt ceiling is much higher, and it involves MWC titles and Big Dance runs.