• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

It was an AF cameraman who shot the video

Why is this even an issue? I don't care who shot the video or posted the video. A coach berating another coach post-game would have caught the attention of anyone with a camera at any school at any stadium in this day and age. Wyoming is no exception. Why are we trying to throw the guy under the bus?
 
Cornpoke said:
Why is this even an issue? I don't care who shot the video or posted the video. A coach berating another coach post-game would have caught the attention of anyone with a camera at any school at any stadium in this day and age. Wyoming is no exception. Why are we trying to throw the guy under the bus?

I don't think that is is that he FILMED it, but I think a lot of people feel it was not necessary to post it. Kind of bush league.
 
I don't think anyone cares that he filmed it. That was his job.

Leaking it on YouTube under a dummy account after DC apologized and was reprimanded was a clear effort to further embarrass UW. And I'm not down with that.
 
TheCup said:
I don't think anyone cares that he filmed it. That was his job.

Leaking it on YouTube under a dummy account after DC apologized and was reprimanded was a clear effort to further embarrass UW. And I'm not down with that.
+1
 
TheCup said:
I don't think anyone cares that he filmed it. That was his job.

Leaking it on YouTube under a dummy account after DC apologized and was reprimanded was a clear effort to further embarrass UW. And I'm not down with that.
+1000
 
TheCup said:
I don't think anyone cares that he filmed it. That was his job.

Leaking it on YouTube under a dummy account after DC apologized and was reprimanded was a clear effort to further embarrass UW. And I'm not down with that.
Oh, so showing exactly what went on, post-apology, putting things in perspective that generated a general opinion that what went on called for much more than an apology, is somehow wrong and now this guy's to blame for Christensen's actions? Seriously? You're like the guy who says he wouldn't have landed in court in front of a judge if the facts hadn't come out because someone wouldn't be quiet.
 
The only problem I have is the ordeal was a setup. They were taunting him and got the exact reaction they wanted. I do not agree with what he did regardless.
 
TheCup said:
I don't think anyone cares that he filmed it. That was his job.

Leaking it on YouTube under a dummy account after DC apologized and was reprimanded was a clear effort to further embarrass UW. And I'm not down with that.
Of course he did it to make UW look stupid. If the shoe was on the other foot and Calhoun was the one that tried to turn a college football game into a WWF event, and you had the video, are you saying you wouldn't have put it up? I think you'd be in the minority here.
 
wyocowboy2014 said:
The only problem I have is the ordeal was a setup. They were taunting him and got the exact reaction they wanted. I do not agree with what he did regardless.
He's paid over $1M a year to be the guy that doesn't fall for shit like that. No?
 
The vast majority of the fans on here seem to not agree with DC's remarks and actions. However, just cause DC "may" have been in the wrong, that doesn't make the actions by AFA right!!!! He said what he felt, and I do respct that part of it.

Why can't people see this. This was a bush league move. they knew the University would get mud all over their faces because of it. Why else would the video get taken down? Which begs the question...whatwas the motivation on why to put it up? It was coming back on them. Video didn't capture Calhoun's face. Video didn't capture Calhoun chasing down the UW players and forcing them to try and shake hands. Video didn't get what he may have said to our players.

I, for one, do NOT agree with DC's comments. Silly and over the top. With that being said, I try and put myself in his situation. Smiling Howdy Doody comes and grins in my face like the dip#hit he was, I would have had to restrain pretty bad.
 
The way I see it, there is a multitude of classless things with this situation:

1) Faking the injury
2) DC's tirade
3) the posting of the video
4) the posting of the videographer's PERSONAL information (that's just flat out dangerous)

Everyone involved has acted like a bunch of children. This is a GAME, remember.
 
cowboyz said:
Of course he did it to make UW look stupid. If the shoe was on the other foot and Calhoun was the one that tried to turn a college football game into a WWF event, and you had the video, are you saying you wouldn't have put it up? I think you'd be in the minority here.

I might have. But I don't work for a university athletic department so the standard is a little bit different.
 
BackHarlowRoad said:
The way I see it, there is a multitude of classless things with this situation:

4) the posting of the videographer's PERSONAL information (that's just flat out dangerous)

Everyone involved has acted like a bunch of children. This is a GAME, remember.

Dangerous? Really? Somehow I don't think we have any Auburn-style tree poisoners in our midst.

Christensen should have never melted down to begin with. No question about it and no one is saying otherwise. But it is equally true that the posting of that video essentially cost Christensen $50,000, did significant harm to the reputation of the Wyoming football program and will negatively impact our recruiting going forward.

So, please, save me the wailing about it being "dangerous." People who care about Wyoming athletics should know how, why and by whom that video was posted online under a dummy youtube account.
 
TheCup said:
BackHarlowRoad said:
The way I see it, there is a multitude of classless things with this situation:

4) the posting of the videographer's PERSONAL information (that's just flat out dangerous)

Everyone involved has acted like a bunch of children. This is a GAME, remember.

Dangerous? Really? Somehow I don't think we have any Auburn-style tree poisoners in our midst.

Christensen should have never melted down to begin with. No question about it and no one is saying otherwise. But it is equally true that the posting of that video essentially cost Christensen $50,000, did significant harm to the reputation of the Wyoming football program and will negatively impact our recruiting going forward.

So, please, save me the wailing about it being "dangerous." People who care about Wyoming athletics should know how, why and by whom that video was posted online under a dummy youtube account.
How is that "true"? You have no idea when Burman concluded what he had to do, whether it was before or after the posting of the video.
 
Wyovanian said:
How is that "true"? You have no idea when Burman concluded what he had to do, whether it was before or after the posting of the video.

Burman was fairly clear in his comments after the fine that the attention brought about by the YouTube video played a role in his decision, even if it wasn't the determining factor.
 
TheCup said:
Wyovanian said:
How is that "true"? You have no idea when Burman concluded what he had to do, whether it was before or after the posting of the video.

Burman was fairly clear in his comments after the fine that the attention brought about by the YouTube video played a role in his decision, even if it wasn't the determining factor.
Playing a role and being a deciding factor are very different things. Fact is, there were several of us who voiced our concerns to the AD's office before the video surfaced. I'm not sure Burman said anything specifically about the attention garnered by the video, but he did say he was responding in part to boosters and donors, as well he should in this situation. He'd already seen the video, he'd gotten input from fans, all before said fans saw the video. I think it's highly possible he'd already made up his mind. The video surfaced the day before the team left for Fresno, so I'd say he quite prudently sat on it until the following Monday. Calm, deliberative, and measured- everything I expect from an executive decision-maker.
 
Wyovanian said:
How is that "true"? You have no idea when Burman concluded what he had to do, whether it was before or after the posting of the video.

Let's just say that he did make the decision in a timely manner, before the video was posted. Then he waited several days.

That's just worse. He is a big loser in this mess. I lost a lot of respect for him.
 
Lost Poke said:
Wyovanian said:
How is that "true"? You have no idea when Burman concluded what he had to do, whether it was before or after the posting of the video.

Let's just say that he did make the decision in a timely manner, before the video was posted. Then he waited several days.

That's just worse. He is a big loser in this mess. I lost a lot of respect for him.
By the time the decision was made, following consultation and input, the equipment truck was likely on the road to Fresno, the practices and prep were past the point of no return, and it was near the eve of the game in Fresno. Suspending Christensen at that point would've been far less prudent, and potentially impacted more than one game, than waiting until the time was right to impact a single game.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top