ragtimejoe1 said:
Top spenders in millions for football in 2019...
csu 25 (stadium might be part of that?)
BSU 19.5
FSU 16.8
SDSU 16.8
UW 13.8
usu 13.2
HI 13
Rest are ballpark of 10
Coaches salaries in football
FSU 6.2
WYO 5.2
BSU 5
csu 5
usu 4.2
SDSU 3.9
Rest are ballpark 2.5-3 (HI not reporting in 2019)
From 2014-2019, WYO increased...
Football coaches salaries by 76%; MWC median = +49%.
Football spending by 84%; MWC median = +44%
FWIW
Nice! thanks for putting those numbers out there!
Here are some more numbers about results. I just did this quickly so please point out if I made a mistake. My methodology was to consider a program properly paid if their performance was within one ranking of actual ranked winning percentage. This is a list of MWC teams ranked in order of conference game winning percentage for the years 2015 through 2020 along with thier 2019 spending rank (I ranked the 10 Million teams as 8th):
Win% Team Spending rank
0.826 BSU 2
0.717 SDSU 4
0.614 AFA 8
0.522 USU 6
0.521 NEV 8
0.500 WYO 5
0.477 CSU 1
0.432 FRES 3
0.396 HAW 7
0.383 SJSU 8
0.319 UNM 8
0.283 UNLV 8
Wyoming, SJSU, UNM, UNLV, and BSU perform about what you would expect based on spending.
CSU, Fresno, and Hawaii perform worse than expected.
SDSU, AFA, USU, and NEV all perform better than what their spending would predict.
Coaches salary (The bottom 6 are all ranked 7th):
0.826 BSU 3
0.717 SDSU 6
0.614 AFA 7
0.522 USU 5
0.521 NEV 7
0.500 WYO 2
0.477 CSU 3
0.432 FRES 1
0.396 HAW 7
0.383 SJSU 7
0.319 UNM 7
0.283 UNLV 7
USU, Haw, SJSU, UNM, UNLV are getting approximately what they are paying for.
BSU, WYO, Fresno, and CSU are Overpaying.
AFA, NEV, and SDSU are getting more wins than they paid for.
Kind of reveals what we already knew I suppose. It is interesting that AFA, NEV, and SDSU are getting bargains in both overall spending and coach's salary. Fresno and CSU are not getting a good deal in either category. I don't see anything compelling here except Bohl is under-performing his salary. Is that salary number a part of the overall spending number or are they separate? These are pretty flat distributions as well...the top team spends roughly double the bottom teams in both categories. The middle in both categories is much closer to the bottom.