WYOBISONMAN
Well-known member
In the past, Bohl likes to recruit overlooked talent and bring them along in his system. He is not big into transfers.
WYOBISONMAN said:In the past, Bohl likes to recruit overlooked talent and bring them along in his system. He is not big into transfers.
Yep, NDSU blows away their MVC competition across the board. In recruiting, facilities, etc., Bohl was unchallenged. He's a far cry from that at Wyoming. This is an entirely new ball game. If a recruit went FCS, NDSU wins out nearly every time for a kid. I don't think I need to remind anyone that the top FBS recruits do not end up in Laramie.BeaverPoke said:Recruiting at the FCS level is entirely different than the FBS level.
Building a team that can compete at the top of the FCS is all good when you're in the FCS. But when you consider of 95% of the FBS teams would compete at the top of the FCS it doesn't quite cut it.
I see Bohl 2.0. He has literally been here 14 months. Give the dude some time before we say he's failed and were doomed. There were marked improvements last year from the year before. No it didn't equate to more wins but he is setting the foundation for his football culture. He wants to be here. He wants to build success here. He thinks he can do it, he thinks he is recruiting the players to turn it around. Lets give him a chance. Shit, when was the last time we had a recruiting class with this many stars? When was the last time we had a recruiting class with a Nebraska Gatorade player of the year? When was the last time we went in a stole multiple, top tier recruits from the state of oklahoma? It takes time. It is obvious to me, under developing players will not be an issue with Coach Bohl.BeaverPoke said:Kansas of course you don't see Glenn 2,0 here, you see Nick Saban 2.0
Has there ever been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to Wyoming over Texas, Alabama, and USC?BeaverPoke said:In the past he was at an FCS school so that's all he had to recruit was overlooked talent.
There has never been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to North Dakota State over Texas, Alabama, and USC.
Recruiting at the FCS level is entirely different than the FBS level.
Building a team that can compete at the top of the FCS is all good when you're in the FCS. But when you consider that 95% of the FBS teams would compete at the top of the FCS it doesn't quite cut it.
Nope. Glenn landed some solid prospects, and Brett Smith was a respected recruit to an extent based on rankings, but no Wyoming doesn't land elite recruits. Very few non-P5 schools do.joshvanklomp said:Has there ever been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to Wyoming over Texas, Alabama, and USC?
joshvanklomp said:Has there ever been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to Wyoming over Texas, Alabama, and USC?BeaverPoke said:In the past he was at an FCS school so that's all he had to recruit was overlooked talent.
There has never been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to North Dakota State over Texas, Alabama, and USC.
Recruiting at the FCS level is entirely different than the FBS level.
Building a team that can compete at the top of the FCS is all good when you're in the FCS. But when you consider that 95% of the FBS teams would compete at the top of the FCS it doesn't quite cut it.
Your point was that Bohl only could recruit overlooked talent because he was FCS and would never beat Alabama for a kid. If it's so different at Wyoming, who are the guys Wyoming has beaten the elite programs for?BeaverPoke said:joshvanklomp said:Has there ever been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to Wyoming over Texas, Alabama, and USC?BeaverPoke said:In the past he was at an FCS school so that's all he had to recruit was overlooked talent.
There has never been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to North Dakota State over Texas, Alabama, and USC.
Recruiting at the FCS level is entirely different than the FBS level.
Building a team that can compete at the top of the FCS is all good when you're in the FCS. But when you consider that 95% of the FBS teams would compete at the top of the FCS it doesn't quite cut it.
What another great post by the monkey.
joshvanklomp said:Your point was that Bohl only could recruit overlooked talent because he was FCS and would never beat Alabama for a kid. If it's so different at Wyoming, who are the guys Wyoming has beaten the elite programs for?BeaverPoke said:joshvanklomp said:Has there ever been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to Wyoming over Texas, Alabama, and USC?BeaverPoke said:In the past he was at an FCS school so that's all he had to recruit was overlooked talent.
There has never been a kid at the All-American game on signing day that decided he wanted to go to North Dakota State over Texas, Alabama, and USC.
Recruiting at the FCS level is entirely different than the FBS level.
Building a team that can compete at the top of the FCS is all good when you're in the FCS. But when you consider that 95% of the FBS teams would compete at the top of the FCS it doesn't quite cut it.
What another great post by the monkey.
Who said anything about only recruiting FCS kids? FCS recruits aren't the only ones who get overlooked.BeaverPoke said:But exactly like I said earlier, having your pick of FCS recruits is all good when you are playing FCS teams. But not in real D1. Not in the MWC.
No, but it's incredibly difficult to do. Boise at their height turned a few 2-star players into 1st round talent. Below is a list of lowly recruited players they've turned into stars since.joshvanklomp said:Who said anything about only recruiting FCS kids? FCS recruits aren't the only ones who get overlooked.
BeaverPoke said:I'm all good with the under the radar guys IF we can get an O-Line of 3* guys and a 3* QB.
Does Nick Saban 1.0 have a nice Ass.?kansasCowboy said:BeaverPoke said:I'm all good with the under the radar guys IF we can get an O-Line of 3* guys and a 3* QB.
Don't forget to get a Nick Saban 2.0, Ass.
Just to clarify....ACS beat out a JC transfer (Benjamin?) for the starting job half way through the season. That JC transfer sucked. Other than that, there was no competition.LanderPoke said:Yes, yes we are talking about true freshmen, of course. The only reason Brett Smith and ACS started was because there wasn't anyone even as good as Kirk. The point is it's very, very rare and it's got to be a perfect storm for a true freshman to play as a true freshman.BeaverPoke said:cali2wyo said:LanderPoke said:Even if we had a world beater qb with all the talent in the world he still probably would not have beaten out Kirk last year.
And there goes your argument down the drain....
I think anyone here would take true freshman ACS or Brett Smith over super senior Kirk any day
+1
SEVERAL freshman QBs start every season.
Yes a lot of them are in spreads or are RS-freshman but it is not too hard to find freshman QBs playing.
And the only reason ACS and Brett got to play was because they could run and improvise. A running/improvising qb is not supposed to happen in Bohl's offense.
JimmyDimes said:If the guy was transferring from a solid winning program, then I could see looking into it. But Oregon State? Pass. We have a similar guy in Coffman. Plus, I think we have plenty of QB talent already.
JimmyDimes said:If the guy was transferring from a solid winning program, then I could see looking into it. But Oregon State? Pass. We have a similar guy in Coffman. Plus, I think we have plenty of QB talent already.