• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

For you anti DC folk...

kansasCowboy said:
Your sure about that? 96 we were 1- deminsional. Extremely pass heavy. I think our averages throu the year were 365 passing and 127 rushing a game. That's 492 yards a game. This year we avg 310 passing and 209 rushing. That's a total of 519 a game.
Look at the level of competition. We have played nobody this year, outside of a somewhat iffy Nebraska team.
 
First off im not anti DC in anyway. I love the offense. As much as i bitched about the defense giving up 31 points yesterday they didn't play "That" bad. The thing that had me more frustrated than anything was the fact we came out in the 3rd quarter and played flat and luckily we were able to pick it back up for the win in the 4th.

I just wish when we get up big at halftime we would come out and finish the other team off in the 3rd qtr. and then if they want to lolligag they can do it in the 4th when they are up by 5 td's. That's really my only gripe.

As far as which offense its better between the '96 team and this years you can't go by just yards because this team is playing way faster so they get more plays off per game. So its tough to compare because the games are different. Wyoming was first in offense in the conference in '96. I would say the '96 was the better team overall and i don't think its very close. Doesn't matter though as its tough to compare different era's.

Hopefully this team will win the rest of their games like the '96 team did and then win a bowl game and we can say the 2013 team ended up better.
 
BeaverPoke said:
Really Cuttslam? You are another dickhole fan that just comes to be a pissy fan as well.
So if Wyoming's offense is putting up more points in each game than we were in 96, explain to me how that offense was better?
Those were in the WAC days of no defense too, so shouldn't it have been easier?

Sad to say it Beaver, but your posts have become ugly, profane, and shallow. Put your big boy pants on and talk like an adult.
Cursing doesnt add to the strength of your argument. It makes you look small. Personally attacking other people on this board doesn't add much to your credibility either.

Take a look at the posts you have just shared. They are ugly, childish and beneath you. They add about as much to our conversation as a fart in a wedding.

So rein it in. Or head off to another board with those who have the same standards for discourse as your own. :tickedoff:
 
seattlecowboy said:
First off im not anti DC in anyway. I love the offense. As much as i bitched about the defense giving up 31 points yesterday they didn't play "That" bad. The thing that had me more frustrated than anything was the fact we came out in the 3rd quarter and played flat and luckily we were able to pick it back up for the win in the 4th.

I just wish when we get up big at halftime we would come out and finish the other team off in the 3rd qtr. and then if they want to lolligag they can do it in the 4th when they are up by 5 td's. That's really my only gripe.

As far as which offense its better between the '96 team and this years you can't go by just yards because this team is playing way faster so they get more plays off per game. So its tough to compare because the games are different. Wyoming was first in offense in the conference in '96. I would say the '96 was the better team overall and i don't think its very close. Doesn't matter though as its tough to compare different era's.

Hopefully this team will win the rest of their games like the '96 team did and then win a bowl game and we can say the 2013 team ended up better.
An issue consistent with HCDC... I'm extremely curious about what goes on in his half time locker room...
 
BeaverPoke said:
Really Cuttslam? You are another dickhole fan that just comes to be a pissy fan as well.
So if Wyoming's offense is putting up more points in each game than we were in 96, explain to me how that offense was better?
Those were in the WAC days of no defense too, so shouldn't it have been easier?
Have you ever been in special education???? That would explain a lot.
 
96 offense throughout the season averages 38.67 points per game scoring a total of 464.
2013 offense throughout half the season is averaging 37.67 scoring a total of 226.
So, the 96 offense is slightly ahead of the 13 offense. But don't be surprised if the 13 team goes up, as they play a lot of teams with absolutely no defense coming up.
 
Cuttslam said:
BeaverPoke said:
Really Cuttslam? You are another dickhole fan that just comes to be a pissy fan as well.
So if Wyoming's offense is putting up more points in each game than we were in 96, explain to me how that offense was better?
Those were in the WAC days of no defense too, so shouldn't it have been easier?
Have you ever been in special education???? That would explain a lot.


Like I said, just another dickhole fan.
 
WyoAlum1987 said:
BeaverPoke said:
Really Cuttslam? You are another dickhole fan that just comes to be a pissy fan as well.
So if Wyoming's offense is putting up more points in each game than we were in 96, explain to me how that offense was better?
Those were in the WAC days of no defense too, so shouldn't it have been easier?

Sad to say it Beaver, but your posts have become ugly, profane, and shallow. Put your big boy pants on and talk like an adult.
Cursing doesnt add to the strength of your argument. It makes you look small. Personally attacking other people on this board doesn't add much to your credibility either.

Take a look at the posts you have just shared. They are ugly, childish and beneath you. They add about as much to our conversation as a fart in a wedding.

So rein it in. Or head off to another board with those who have the same standards for discourse as your own. :tickedoff:

Oh, you are the overall decider of what goes on at Wyonation? You are the king here, the decider? Oh I'm sorry, I didn't get your damn approval before I post something.
Maybe provide something to the conversation that isn't telling me to behave myself. :roll:
 
BeaverPoke said:
Cuttslam said:
BeaverPoke said:
Really Cuttslam? You are another dickhole fan that just comes to be a pissy fan as well.
So if Wyoming's offense is putting up more points in each game than we were in 96, explain to me how that offense was better?
Those were in the WAC days of no defense too, so shouldn't it have been easier?
Have you ever been in special education???? That would explain a lot.


Like I said, just another dickhole fan.
Is that a positive or negative ? I would assume all MEN (post puberty) would appreciate their dickhole.
 
Beaver,
I only posted what I did because I hoped you'd listen.
The truth is, I used to like to read what you wrote.
Now, your posts are as inane and profane as any troll to be found
I wont be surprised if you get booted
and at this point
I wont mind either
 
Beaver does let his emotion show, but the fact of the matter is this fan base is embarrassing. We sit here and complain about a win and act like we are some wonderful top 20 program in the country. NEWS FLASH we are a sub 500 program in our history, this program isn't very good overall. So I am sorry if I say it is an improvement when we have athletes that can compete with teams like Nebraska athletically that Wyoming has never had before. We may have had good teams in the past, but I sure would argue that this is one of the most athletic ones ever. Progress is winning games, so when we are on track to have 3 winning seasons in 5 years and have a coach that has this team improving every year, that is why I say there is progress. A head coach as a supervisor like you are saying, then look at all the facts, he recruits great, has us winning games, never lost to our rival, we have the best academics ever and no off the field issue. Some people on this board act like they know absolutely nothing about football or what it takes to become a good program, and the start is the little things like good academics, and getting good recruits in there. I haven't been a fan of the Pokes that long but from what I see this fan base is delusional and thinks that it should be Nebraska every single year. We have a sub par football history so when we finally get a coach that does the right things for the players in the classroom and outside of football, as well as having winning seasons I am sorry but he is doing a good job.
 
WyoAlum1987 said:
Beaver,
I only posted what I did because I hoped you'd listen.
The truth is, I used to like to read what you wrote.
Now, your posts are as inane and profane as any troll to be found
I wont be surprised if you get booted
and at this point
I wont mind either

Nor would I. :twisted:
 
Wyokie said:
WyoAlum1987 said:
Beaver,
I only posted what I did because I hoped you'd listen.
The truth is, I used to like to read what you wrote.
Now, your posts are as inane and profane as any troll to be found
I wont be surprised if you get booted
and at this point
I wont mind either

Nor would I. :twisted:

Lol one day of dropping the f-bomb in my posts because of an incredibly whiny group of people complaining about a WIN and you want to boot me? Go for it. If that is the way you get the message board to agree with what you say is by banning the people who actually see good things in a victory by all means go for it. But wait, I thought this message board was to be different from gowyogo?
Didn't realize I was supposed to be a miserable fan and be pissed off after a win like the rest of you. I guess I am not a true Wyoming Cowboy fan like you great ones.
 
BeaverPoke said:
Wyokie said:
WyoAlum1987 said:
Beaver,
I only posted what I did because I hoped you'd listen.
The truth is, I used to like to read what you wrote.
Now, your posts are as inane and profane as any troll to be found
I wont be surprised if you get booted
and at this point
I wont mind either

Nor would I. :twisted:

Lol one day of dropping the f-bomb in my posts because of an incredibly whiny group of people complaining about a WIN and you want to boot me? Go for it. If that is the way you get the message board to agree with what you say is by banning the people who actually see good things in a victory by all means go for it. But wait, I thought this message board was to be different from gowyogo?
Didn't realize I was supposed to be a miserable fan and be pissed off after a win like the rest of you. I guess I am not a true Wyoming Cowboy fan like you great ones.
HAHAHA one day of dropping f-bombs? Are you kidding me. Your ARE delusional.
 
Beaver,
Stop playing the victim and shifting the blame ...
It is obvious to everyone-and should be to you =
that you are on everyone's last nerve
this has nothing to do with your point of view, and everything to do with how you are continually choosing to express it.
Clean up your language, Stop personally attacking those who disagree with you.
You are driving people who are fun to talk to away from this board,
most of your posts are shallow and bitter (though you still write a good one now and then)
and you are no longer fun to talk to
and that is a crying shame.
 
WyoAlum, I agree Beaver needs to stop the personal attacks as well as the language. I can see why he is upset, along with me that it isn't fun to come to a board that should be in good spirits after improving to 4-2 and 2-0 in conference play and having a victory on homecoming with one of the better crowds I have seen the last few years, but instead everyone is doom and gloom and saying this team sucks. DC is doing a good job here and getting good recruits and winning games. Be happy about winning and stop whining about it not being like the good old days. This is a good team, and we are having more success in the last 5 years than this program has usually had so we shouldn't be complaining about winning football games.
 
WyoAlum1987 said:
Beaver,
Stop playing the victim and shifting the blame ...
It is obvious to everyone-and should be to you =
that you are on everyone's last nerve
this has nothing to do with your point of view, and everything to do with how you are continually choosing to express it.
Clean up your language, Stop personally attacking those who disagree with you.
You are driving people who are fun to talk to away from this board,
most of your posts are shallow and bitter (though you still write a good one now and then)
and you are no longer fun to talk to
and that is a crying shame.

Hmm, driving people away? I don't know about that. I do know, that I have talked a couple people into coming onto the board....so, there's that.

But let me clear this one thing up...I will apologize to wyonavian for calling him an idiot. But, people need to know, that when I am dropping the f-bomb in every post, and strongly disagreeing with someone, I am not trying to insult them, just make my point clear, and point out the lack of logic in their posts.
Besides wyonavian, the only other person I have tried to attack or insult is McPeachy, and well, everyone knows that one is mutual lol. And with Cuttslam, I just let him know he can be an ass.

So yeah I won't be personally attacking people, as that is rarely my goal, and I will quit using f-bombs...... lol
 
The negative Nancy attitude gets old. Along with the typical Wyoming attitude. Constructive criticism is one thing. But many of you on here are in the verge of cheering for us to lose so we can fire DC. And that is just sad.....
 
WyoAlum1987 said:
Beaver,
Stop playing the victim and shifting the blame ...
It is obvious to everyone-and should be to you =
that you are on everyone's last nerve
this has nothing to do with your point of view, and everything to do with how you are continually choosing to express it.
Clean up your language, Stop personally attacking those who disagree with you.
You are driving people who are fun to talk to away from this board,
most of your posts are shallow and bitter (though you still write a good one now and then)
and you are no longer fun to talk to
and that is a crying shame.

Your the troll.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top