Fire Vigen

[Cowboy Junky]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

 

[joshvanklomp]

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.

Last I checked, we won today. Did you watch a different game by accident?

 

[Poke-proud]

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.

Last I checked, we won today. Did you watch a different game by accident?

I watched the same game - how many pints did we score in the second half? How many points did we score off turnovers last week? Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then. I guess we'll just be "vanilla".


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Poke-proud]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Cowboy Junky]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

 

[Poke-proud]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

K, says the "head coach". Gotcha there "Tom Landry". [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Poke-proud]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

oh and coach Landry, let's hope "vanilla" and predictable work against Oregon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Cowboy Junky]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

K, says the "head coach". Gotcha there "Tom Landry". [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, I'm just like you: not a head coach or an A.D. I'm a CJ club member and that's as far as it goes.

Guess what though: I'm not campaigning to fire a guy(in demand q.b. coach) that found/helped develop Wentz and Allen. I'm not disregarding his 35-40 points per game average last season because of the first two games this year.

I'm not actually stupid enough to think that my message board opinion is going to change the views of Burman or Bohl.

I am going to call b.s. on the arm chair qb's trying to play message board A.D.

The reality: Vigen was just given a raise and the Associate Head Coach title. Bohl and Burman are pretty happy with his performance.

 

[Poke-proud]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

K, says the "head coach". Gotcha there "Tom Landry". [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, I'm just like you: not a head coach or an A.D. I'm a CJ club member and that's as far as it goes.

Guess what though: I'm not campaigning to fire a guy(in demand q.b. coach) that found/helped develop Wentz and Allen. I'm not disregarding his 35-40 points per game average last season because of the first two games this year.

I'm not actually stupid enough to think that my message board opinion is going to change the views of Burman or Bohl.

I am going to call b.s. on the arm chair qb's trying to play message board A.D.

The reality: Vigen was just given a raise and the Associate Head Coach title. Bohl and Burman are pretty happy with his performance.

OK head coach, I'm sure you're pretty busy there in a NFL locker room somewhere getting ready for the big game today. Better let you be.......


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Cowboy Junky]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

oh and coach Landry, let's hope "vanilla" and predictable work against Oregon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can usually tell how much someone knows about football when they disregard everything else to lay the blame solely on the o.c. Those people are brain dead morons.

1. Lost our strength coach: Vigen's fault.
2. 2 true freshmen starting on the oline: must be play calling.
3. Sent Hill, Roullier....to the NFL and replaced them with guys that aren't as good yet: Vigen needs to call more trick plays.
4. Less athletes/experience than the other team: Vigen needs to use Poke Prouds playbook and none of that matters.

If only Brett Vigen's play book had magical fairy dust, Wyoming would be undefeated every season.

 

[Cowboy Junky]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

K, says the "head coach". Gotcha there "Tom Landry". [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, I'm just like you: not a head coach or an A.D. I'm a CJ club member and that's as far as it goes.

Guess what though: I'm not campaigning to fire a guy(in demand q.b. coach) that found/helped develop Wentz and Allen. I'm not disregarding his 35-40 points per game average last season because of the first two games this year.

I'm not actually stupid enough to think that my message board opinion is going to change the views of Burman or Bohl.

I am going to call b.s. on the arm chair qb's trying to play message board A.D.

The reality: Vigen was just given a raise and the Associate Head Coach title. Bohl and Burman are pretty happy with his performance.

OK head coach, I'm sure you're pretty busy there in a NFL locker room somewhere getting ready for the big game today. Better let you be.......


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You need to get busy drawing up some more plays to mail into Vigen, so we have a chance to go to a bowl game this year.

If only Poke Proud was calling the plays: we would be national champions.

Instead we have to settle with the guy Craig Bohl just gave a new title and a raise.

It must piss you off to know that Vigen got the title and money you deserve for successfully running the triple reverse pitch pass in your back yard with your kids.

 

[Poke-proud]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

oh and coach Landry, let's hope "vanilla" and predictable work against Oregon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can usually tell how much someone knows about football when they disregard everything else to lay the blame solely on the o.c. Those people are brain dead morons.

1. Lost our strength coach: Vigen's fault.
2. 2 true freshmen starting on the oline: must be play calling.
3. Sent Hill, Roullier....to the NFL and replaced them with guys that aren't as good yet: Vigen needs to call more trick plays.

If only Brett Vigen's play book had magical fairy dust, Wyoming would be undefeated every season.

So right Mr Landry. So you should bring those HC talents of yours to good ole UW, since I have an opinion but you say it doesn't matter .

I really will be done after this post since Ive wasted so much of your time today and I'm sure you're getting ready for your big game today. G'day


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Cowboy Junky]

Yeah, let's fire the guy that's found and developed Wentz and Allen. We definitely need to fire him since he only averaged 35 points a game in leading us to our first MWC championship game in history and our first chance at a title since 96.

People are dense.

So if a team recruits kids that end up in the NFL (which is cool)', but can't put together a game plan to win a game - that's "OK". That might be dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or firing a guy that averaged almost 40 points a game last year, in a pro set offense.....That's a little more dense.

I'm not worried, because there's no chance in hell we're getting rid of him.

We'll let me know how that "40 points last year" thingy worked in the Iowa game. Living in the past is really..........dense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not nearly as dense as a bunch of couch potatoes(with zero head coaching experience) scapegoating an o.c. for a loss and campaigning to have him fired from the anonymous position on a message board.

I'm not really concerned, because none of you are Burman or Bohl and it's not going to happen. Vigen just got a raise and a new title.

It's just annoying that I have to read all the "experts" on Wyonation for the next three or four seasons.

oh and coach Landry, let's hope "vanilla" and predictable work against Oregon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can usually tell how much someone knows about football when they disregard everything else to lay the blame solely on the o.c. Those people are brain dead morons.

1. Lost our strength coach: Vigen's fault.
2. 2 true freshmen starting on the oline: must be play calling.
3. Sent Hill, Roullier....to the NFL and replaced them with guys that aren't as good yet: Vigen needs to call more trick plays.

If only Brett Vigen's play book had magical fairy dust, Wyoming would be undefeated every season.

So right Mr Landry. So you should bring those HC talents of yours to good ole UW, since I have an opinion but you say it doesn't matter .

I really will be done after this post since I've water so much of your time getting ready for your big game today. G'day


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Remind me again who's pretending to know more than Craig Bohl, Tom Burman, and Brent Vigen?

Good arguing tactic though. You've taken "I'm rubber and you're glue" to a whole new level.

"Arm chair coaches know more than Bohl and Vigen.....Bullshit."

"Okay coach Landry."

I'm not sorry for trusting Craig Bohls football opinion more than Lander Poke or Poke Proud. He's been getting paid as a football coach for 30 + years. I am willing to bet my entire life savings that you don't have a comparable resume to Craig Bohl when it comes to coaching football.

Sometimes it's okay to admit we aren't as good as Iowa and then realize that there isn't a magical pixie play calling scheme that could have beat them with this years Wyoming team executing the plays.

It's called reality. You should look into it.

 

[joshvanklomp]

Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then.

Last I checked the object is to win. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

If we go on to win 10 games with a "vanilla offense," are you going to still call for the OC's head due to a lack of offensive wrinkles?

 

[Poke-proud]

Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then.

Last I checked the object is to win. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

If we go on to win 10 games with a "vanilla offense," are you going to still call for the OC's head due to a lack of offensive wrinkles?

You're delusional to think we'll win 10 games. We looked bad against Iowa, and should have put up another 20 easily on Gardner Webb. If you really can say with a straight face you believe we'll win 10, you either live or are spending Way too much time at the dispensaries in Colorado. [emoji15]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Cowboy Junky]

Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then.

Last I checked the object is to win. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

If we go on to win 10 games with a "vanilla offense," are you going to still call for the OC's head due to a lack of offensive wrinkles?

That's the easiest thing in the world to say. We're vanilla.

What does that mean exactly?

What plays should he call that aren't "Vanilla"?

Is the scheme "Vanilla" and we should change to a spread offense, like every other college in the country.

All these arm chair offensive coordinators have an infinite supply of criticism, but if you ask them for solutions, their buckets are completely empty of that. Their only answer for that is: Fire Vigen.

What plays should Vigen call.....experts of the o.c. world?

All of these Vigen critics have criticism, but no solutions.

What plays should Vigen be calling that's going to allow our team to beat Iowa on the road?

 

[Poke-proud]

Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then.

Last I checked the object is to win. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

If we go on to win 10 games with a "vanilla offense," are you going to still call for the OC's head due to a lack of offensive wrinkles?

That's the easiest thing in the world to say. We're vanilla.

What does that mean exactly?

What plays should he call that aren't "Vanilla"?

Is the scheme "Vanilla" and we should change to a spread offense, like every other college in the country.

All these arm chair offensive coordinators have an infinite supply of criticism, but if you ask them for solutions, their buckets are completely empty of that. Their only answer for that is: Fire Vigen.

What plays should Vigen call.....experts of the o.c. world?

All of these Vigen critics have criticism, but no solutions.

What plays should Vigen be calling that's going to allow our team to beat Iowa on the road?

Hey coach Landry, I didn't "coin" the term vanilla. It came from Vigan and Bohl. [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Cowboy Junky]

Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then.

Last I checked the object is to win. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

If we go on to win 10 games with a "vanilla offense," are you going to still call for the OC's head due to a lack of offensive wrinkles?

That's the easiest thing in the world to say. We're vanilla.

What does that mean exactly?

What plays should he call that aren't "Vanilla"?

Is the scheme "Vanilla" and we should change to a spread offense, like every other college in the country.

All these arm chair offensive coordinators have an infinite supply of criticism, but if you ask them for solutions, their buckets are completely empty of that. Their only answer for that is: Fire Vigen.

What plays should Vigen call.....experts of the o.c. world?

All of these Vigen critics have criticism, but no solutions.

What plays should Vigen be calling that's going to allow our team to beat Iowa on the road?

He coach Landry, I didn't "coin" the term vanilla. It came from Vegan and Bohl.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're the one pretending to know more than our coaches. I'm not. I trust Vigen and Bohl.

So, what's the solution then?

What plays would you call that are superior to those being called by Vigen and Bohl?

You must know what would be better than what Vigen is currently doing to know that he needs to be fired.

 

[Poke-proud]

Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then.

Last I checked the object is to win. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

If we go on to win 10 games with a "vanilla offense," are you going to still call for the OC's head due to a lack of offensive wrinkles?

That's the easiest thing in the world to say. We're vanilla.

What does that mean exactly?

What plays should he call that aren't "Vanilla"?

Is the scheme "Vanilla" and we should change to a spread offense, like every other college in the country.

All these arm chair offensive coordinators have an infinite supply of criticism, but if you ask them for solutions, their buckets are completely empty of that. Their only answer for that is: Fire Vigen.

What plays should Vigen call.....experts of the o.c. world?

All of these Vigen critics have criticism, but no solutions.

What plays should Vigen be calling that's going to allow our team to beat Iowa on the road?

Hey coach Landry, I didn't "coin" the term vanilla. It came from Vigen and Bohl. [emoji23] lets chat after your big NFL game today, no actually after the Oregon game.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Poke-proud]

Last I checked the object was to keep the opponent off-balance and throw in a wrinkle now and then.

Last I checked the object is to win. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

If we go on to win 10 games with a "vanilla offense," are you going to still call for the OC's head due to a lack of offensive wrinkles?

That's the easiest thing in the world to say. We're vanilla.

What does that mean exactly?

What plays should he call that aren't "Vanilla"?

Is the scheme "Vanilla" and we should change to a spread offense, like every other college in the country.

All these arm chair offensive coordinators have an infinite supply of criticism, but if you ask them for solutions, their buckets are completely empty of that. Their only answer for that is: Fire Vigen.

What plays should Vigen call.....experts of the o.c. world?

All of these Vigen critics have criticism, but no solutions.

What plays should Vigen be calling that's going to allow our team to beat Iowa on the road?

He coach Landry, I didn't "coin" the term vanilla. It came from Vegan and Bohl.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're the one pretending to know more than our coaches. I'm not. I trust Vigen and Bohl.

So, what's the solution then?

What plays would you call that are superior to those being called by Vigen and Bohl?

You must know what would be better than what Vigen is currently doing to know that he needs to be fired.

Oh I don't know, if you're playing against a "good D" aggressive D line, a simple screen every now and then might have been interesting against Iowa, but coach Landry you know, that's just opinion which you've already made clear that I don't have a right to have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk