Since we aren't firing Sawful, do I read the 7220 article on the new OC to mean that no one else is set to be fired? To think that a new OC is the cure-all is naive and borders on lunacy. The OL was trash, when it was supposed to be a strength. The lack of development in the QB room has mind blowing (perhaps the new OC will serve in dual roles, like JJ...goody). I don't know how I feel about the WR and TE - Anderson could never find them when they were open or they were hurt (or waiting for the portal to open). The RBs are similarly hard to assess, as the OL never opened any holes for them to run through or they were hurt - but I can't say they were anything more than mid. To me, it starts and ends with the OL. To keep Tripodi and not revamp that entire outfit is malpractice...but that is sort of what I have come to expect from Sawful.
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!
Fire Tom Burman and Fire Jay Sawvel
- Thread starter LanderPoke
- Start date
What you personally rank as a good or bad nickname doesn't matter to me in the least. I'm here for some good discussion and you have obliged from time to time. I value clarity and straigt-forward discourse. Vieled references, misleading innuendo, and obfuscating language is probably somewhat to be expected but some posters seem to traffic in it more than others. Of all of the people on here, I seem to have more back and forth with you than almost anybody....and a non-zero amount of that time spent on my side of the screen is some version of just trying to get you to clarify what you are talking about when you reference things like "the ire of many". As the statement stood, it could be misconstrued that the ire was from a group of people who would defend Sawful or Aaron Bohl as good coaches....but that has never been the case....All the conversation surrounding the term PBJ is completely because it's just a confusing nickname. I was trying to make that clear as well as put some context into why that particulare moniker bumps people.I do find it humorous that you think I give a rat's ass or am in some kind of competition over names for a failing coach
It's obvious you get some glee out of these exchanges so I expect no reduction in ambiguous and confusing references. This post itself may even send you into some sort of ecstasy...I'm happy to oblige. It will be a sad day when/if we are all gone and this board is dead.
I want this to happen sooooo bad LOL!
Brew_Poke
Well-known member
I'm all about Reubens and Monte Cristos.
ragtimejoe1
Well-known member
Now you did it. We went from the worst and borderline unethical hires in all of college football to the worst sandwiches known to man...hey, I see what you did there. Great correlation!
Monte Cristos are good... but that's like a once a year type of diet splurge. There's a bar in this town called Anaconda, not far from here, that has an amazing Monte Cristo.. but whew boy, don't feel that hot afterward.
LanderPoke
Well-known member
Never had a monte cristo. Is it a breakfast food?
ragtimejoe1
Well-known member
You guys are nuts. Jelly or jam on a sandwich!
@LanderPoke I'll save you time and money. Lick your armpit; it'll taste better.
Sad things I've noticed on Facebook (yes im old) the Wyoming athletics department will put info on there, specifically about the signing class and they lock out comments probably for fear they won't like what they see/hear...boooo hoooo AD get over yourselves already (little fish in big pond anymore)
Bryoming
Well-known member
I guess it could be, but it's on lunch/dinner menus everywhere I've seen one. It's essentially a deep fried ham and cheese sandwich covered in powdered sugar and served with some sort of jam. As @MrTitleist said, it's pretty tasty, but sits like a brick in your gut.
