Regardless of whether or not Wyoming would have done the same thing as Utah and jumped to a new conference, the only reason I want them to leave with a pitiful record is this:
If we can send them packing with a worse record than they finish with in their inaugural season in the Pac-12 then we will be able to say "See, we ARE as competitive as the BCS conferences!"
On the other topic that got brought up:
I would never want a team mascot that I disrespected. I would want one that is geographical and reflected a past or present way of life (ie, Cowboy, 49er, Oiler, Boiler Maker, etc) or someone or something that is swift, powerful, or has abilities exceeding a typical human (ie, bear, eagle, falcon, etc).
It surprises me that "the fighting Irish" is not considered offensive since it conjures up images of drunken, rowdy Irishman in my mind, but whatever floats their boat! LOL
I have never felt it to be disrespectful when a school's mascot is a Ute or Aztec so long as it is presented with respect, taste, and honor. It would be a contradiction to name your school after someone or something that you were mocking, in my opinion. With that being said, if these nationalities find it offensive then change them! The funny thing is though, that I know more history about the Aztecs, the Utes, and the Seminoles, for example, because they ARE mascots than if they weren't.
Now calling a team "the Senators" now that is just downright disrespectful to your team!! LOL
Dictionary: mas·cot
n.
A person, animal, or object believed to bring good luck, especially one kept as the symbol of an organization such as a sports team.