wyopig said:
Honestly, seeing how Tutein is handling this on Twitter may shine some light on why he evidently wasn't invited back. If he's productive, if he's a good teammate, or if he adds something to the program, he would not be asked to leave. This Twitter rants screams that he's the kind of guy that's quick to blame someone/something else for his own problems.
I'll hear him out, but "being crooks?" Sorry, but if I'm a D1 head coach, I may think twice about handing a scholarship to a walk-on player that got 8 tackles last season.
My thoughts too.... You want the top treatment, be the top performer. The only players on this team who shouldn't be worried about their place on the team are Hill and Wingard.
From what I have seen from the outside, if you make waves or don't fit the mold Bohl has set, you're gone. Again.Welcome to the real world. Its doesn't make a coach a crook to not extend a scholly to someone who doesn't fit. Big picture, Bohl (as well as every damn coach in the country) is viewed on how their success on the field. If Bohl does not believe a player will bring the team forward and one step closer to success, he has EVERY right to move on. Just like this board has preached that a player has every right to leave the school and pursue other ventures to further their lives, coaches do too. Every player on this team has the potential to impact Craig Bohl's future one way of the other. You best damn well bet he is going to trim the fat.