I don't see AFA having much success running on our D. They didn't last year and we are much stouter against the run this year....so it appears. I think Wyoming will have success running however. I watched some highlights of their game and early on Nichols State was running 10 yards a pop. Colby needs to work of making a few passeslaxwyo said:Wyoming better score on their opportunities against AF. If both teams can drive he ball, we might only get one possession per quarter.
JimmyDimes said:I don't see AFA having much success running on our D. They didn't last year and we are much stouter against the run this year....so it appears. I think Wyoming will have success running however. I watched some highlights of their game and early on Nichols State was running 10 yards a pop. Colby needs to work of making a few passes
How does it swing from us being a 1 point favorite to AF now favored by 2? Did we have more injuries than we thought? or is it all predicated on Vegas increasing betting lines?J-Rod said:Falcons now a 2-point favorite. Surprised to see that...I don't think this game will be all that close.
Cornpoke said:How does it swing from us being a 1 point favorite to AF now favored by 2? Did we have more injuries than we thought? or is it all predicated on Vegas increasing betting lines?J-Rod said:Falcons now a 2-point favorite. Surprised to see that...I don't think this game will be all that close.
Agreed...I'd surprised to see AFA to score more than 17. I'm leaning more towards them being held to single-digit points.JimmyDimes said:I don't see AFA having much success running on our D. They didn't last year and we are much stouter against the run this year....so it appears. I think Wyoming will have success running however. I watched some highlights of their game and early on Nichols State was running 10 yards a pop. Colby needs to work of making a few passes
J-Rod said:Agreed...I'd surprised to see AFA to score more than 17. I'm leaning more towards them being held to single-digit points.JimmyDimes said:I don't see AFA having much success running on our D. They didn't last year and we are much stouter against the run this year....so it appears. I think Wyoming will have success running however. I watched some highlights of their game and early on Nichols State was running 10 yards a pop. Colby needs to work of making a few passes
bladerunnr said:J-Rod said:Agreed...I'd surprised to see AFA to score more than 17. I'm leaning more towards them being held to single-digit points.JimmyDimes said:I don't see AFA having much success running on our D. They didn't last year and we are much stouter against the run this year....so it appears. I think Wyoming will have success running however. I watched some highlights of their game and early on Nichols State was running 10 yards a pop. Colby needs to work of making a few passes
The total is 57. Betting the under looks like a really good bet because I don't see a whole lot of offense in this game.
bladerunnr said:The total is 57. Betting the under looks like a really good bet because I don't see a whole lot of offense in this game.
hithere said:bladerunnr said:The total is 57. Betting the under looks like a really good bet because I don't see a whole lot of offense in this game.
I'm taking Air Force ML. I'll gladly pay my two units for a Wyoming win.
Are you handicapping CSU-Boise?
NO FORGIVENESS BLASPHEMER!bladerunnr said:hithere said:bladerunnr said:The total is 57. Betting the under looks like a really good bet because I don't see a whole lot of offense in this game.
I'm taking Air Force ML. I'll gladly pay my two units for a Wyoming win.
Are you handicapping CSU-Boise?
Well, I was at the csewe-cu game (went to grad school at CU). Anyway, I was pretty impressed with the csewe running game and their new offensive line. It might be a little hard to know because I suspect CU is still pretty down talent wise. I'm tempted to take the 12 1/2 points with the rams. Boise st. is going to have to prove it to me now that Petersen is gone. Boise's qb looks suspect. Yeah, I like the sheep. God forgive me for saying that.
J-Rod said:Ehh...we'll see. That same BSU QB you claim is "suspect" had 350+ total yards and 6 TDs @CSU last season in only his second start. Ole Miss has a national championship caliber defense....just a slight difference in caliber between them and the Fluffaloes.
Swap opponents....and the narrative changes quite a bit.
Both Jarrells/Hart are very good...just saying that some people are hyping up the Rams too much. Some have called them the MW favorite now...all cause they beat CU? Sorry, but beating the Buffs holds more water than beating Montana ONLY cause of that Pac-12 logo. Otherwise? A wash.bladerunnr said:That's probably right. I keep forgetting CU has been one of the worst teams in the country over the last 3 years. But still, that running back from Alabama looks quick. Perhaps the weed factor is going to help recruiting in Colorado.
bladerunnr said:J-Rod said:Ehh...we'll see. That same BSU QB you claim is "suspect" had 350+ total yards and 6 TDs @CSU last season in only his second start. Ole Miss has a national championship caliber defense....just a slight difference in caliber between them and the Fluffaloes.
Swap opponents....and the narrative changes quite a bit.
That's probably right. I keep forgetting CU has been one of the worst teams in the country over the last 3 years. But still, that running back from Alabama looks quick. Perhaps the weed factor is going to help recruiting in Colorado.
WestWYOPoke said:The sad thing is, this actually is a factor in some recruits decision making. It's still against NCAA rules and if you get caught you are out for half your season, but some kids do look at the legality of pot in CO and take that into consideration when choosing a school.