Not me and I'm dead serious too.I am dead serious when I say this: I would rather have Evan Svoboda under center than Kaden Anderson. Is he a better passer? No, but at least he can run.
Not me and I'm dead serious too.I am dead serious when I say this: I would rather have Evan Svoboda under center than Kaden Anderson. Is he a better passer? No, but at least he can run.
I think I agree.....which is crazy. I think Svoboda could have done better than 6 of 23 for 64 yards and an INT.I am dead serious when I say this: I would rather have Evan Svoboda under center than Kaden Anderson. Is he a better passer? No, but at least he can run.
Svoboda would have likely had 2-3 more INTs. But the fact that we are honestly discussing whether Svoboda or KA is worse than the other tells you all you need to know about the current state of our QB room and OL. The other stories that need to be on the same level as KA's craptastic play are how useless our OL is in pass blocking and how incapable our WRs are at getting open.I think I agree.....which is crazy. I think Svoboda could have done better than 6 of 23 for 64 yards and an INT.
I am dead serious when I say this: I would rather have Evan Svoboda under center than Kaden Anderson. Is he a better passer? No, but at least he can run.
I think I agree.....which is crazy. I think Svoboda could have done better than 6 of 23 for 64 yards and an INT.
Not me and I'm dead serious too.
I have a crisp $20 bill that says Anderson is the starter for the NV game and plays the majority of the game even if he is playing like garbage (which is highly likely). Adaptation and transitioning to the future have never been attributes of a Bohl or Sawful coached outfit. They ride the broken-down mule until it is literally dead in a heap. This season is a lost cause. KA is now functionally an upperclassman and is not the answer going forward. He was a port in the storm when we were facing another year with Svoboda as the signal caller. Time to move on and try to prepare for the future - which KA should not figure into.Sims and Drube are the Sawful recruits. Sims seemed to be the better choice over Anderson but as usual, Sawful declares a starter and he sticks with it. Will we see Drube to finish the year? I won’t be surprised if Sawful stays with Anderson and only allows Drube mop time.
Will Sawful go on an all out offensive revamp and start by hiring an OC that can identify/recruit the best players to run the scheme? Sawful needs to get out of the offense other than being the ultimate responsibility for it. He obviously is not a complete manager to promise an offensive upgrade only to make it worse.
Yes.If I was Bouknight/Sawful, I might give each QB (Drube and Anderson) 2 series against Nevada and the QB who performs better finishes the game. Nevada’s overall defensive ranking is 132 out of 136 FBS teams. Anderson can probably be ok against really bad defenses but certainly has no shot against a SDSU or Fresno defense where a defense having to respect QB run is a requirement to move the ball.
I’ve given up hope that we have any shot against Hawaii and I would play Drube the whole game and see what he might be bringing to the table for next year.
He has lost his mojo, if he ever had it.Maybe it’s time to go with Drube the rest of the year and bench Andervoboda.
Agree, I don't think the top FCS offenses would score much versus SDSU. Their defense was nasty.I just can't shake the nagging belief that it's not just a lack of talent under center. I think the system and the environment are uniquely terrible for offensive production and it has been that way for a loooong time. I hear a lot about how all these great FCS offenses have amazing QB's...but they really don't. Some are good and they will move up but some are good at the level they are at. If you put them in against bigger, faster and more prepared FBS teams they would struggle.
Now...is Anderson or Svoboda any good?...it sure doesn't seem like it..AND not only are they not amazingly talented, they are in a system where the best of the best struggled.
I largely agree with this assessment. While the line blocking hasn’t been great in pass protection, it is not as bad as our stats would suggest. Anderson struggles to go through read progressions (he largely just stares down his first read) and his release of the ball takes what seems forever. Add in lack of mobility and it’s not a great recipe for dropping back to pass and being successful.I actually dont think the offensive line is that bad. You have to get rid of the ball in 3 seconds against good defenses, its just is what it is. There are open receivers too. Anderson has just missed them. Hell he cant even hit a rb on a screen.
All in all the play calling has just been incompetent. Its not like 20 yrs ago when we were just on such a lower talent level than byu, utah, and Tcu. I think we are right there. We couldve very easily won at AF, UNLV and Fresno with a better qb and better play calling/game plan.
The interior of the line has done well, but the tackles have been putrid all season. Go back and watch some tape and focus only on the o-line. Both tackles are either getting their doors blown off by edge rushers or holding.I actually dont think the offensive line is that bad. You have to get rid of the ball in 3 seconds against good defenses, its just is what it is. There are open receivers too. Anderson has just missed them. Hell he cant even hit a rb on a screen.
All in all the play calling has just been incompetent. Its not like 20 yrs ago when we were just on such a lower talent level than byu, utah, and Tcu. I think we are right there. We couldve very easily won at AF, UNLV and Fresno with a better qb and better play calling/game plan.
Most of that can be fixed by playing under center more often and setting up the pass with a better running game. The play calling has been uninspired at best.The interior of the line has done well, but the tackles have been putrid all season. Go back and watch some tape and focus only on the o-line. Both tackles are either getting their doors blown off by edge rushers or holding.