joshvanklomp
Well-known member
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovFpnzx7Pt4[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7qQHN1VmBk[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7qQHN1VmBk[/youtube]
BeaverPoke said:PotatoCreekPete said:BeaverPoke said:PotatoCreekPete said:Not surprised. He came out of HS with a lot of hype and unfortunately he has never been able to put it all together. It would have been a good sized reach to say that he would have had an impact this coming year, just have to wish him the best.Slow Hand said:Rumor is that Sewell Quit.
Wyoming was a soft team and there are a number of guys that are not prepared or able to play Bohl's type of game that were in the program when he took over. As Coach Bohl says, he is building the program so it will stay at a high level for a long time, and that doesn't happen over night.
If I remember correctly, he wasn't so much soft as he was ill and injured. Didn't he lose a bunch of weight and have a hard time putting it on?
Not that you are wrong about attrition from DC to Bohl, but I don't think this is that as much as it's just a kid not panning out.
I wasn't talking about Sewell being "soft", I was speaking of the team as a whole. Remember when Bohl came in he said the team was "fat", and many of the guys have had to lose body fat, and build muscle. If any area on the team was "soft" it probably was the OL imo. I have no doubt that Sewell just didn't pan out, you kind of mixed my two points together.
Ah, well my bad. Seemed like your second point was related to your first one, since you were talking about players leaving, being soft, etc.
theman12 said:I'm excited for this season. The o line scares me to death but with Wick and Hill I'm sure we'll be fine.
That said, once the injuries stopped piling up on them last season, the o-line improved quite a bit.mwc fan said:theman12 said:I'm excited for this season. The o line scares me to death but with Wick and Hill I'm sure we'll be fine.
At least on the O line didn't give up sacks on Coffman. They gave up four to the other QBs, but I'm sure it was a mix of one's, twos and threes on the line. But yeah the O line has always been an issue for years.
Eh...maybe some in run-blocking. They ranked 2nd from dead last nationally in sacks allowed. Depth is lacking...can't afford too many injuries at that position. Or most positions, really.fromolwyoming said:That said, once the injuries stopped piling up on them last season, the o-line improved quite a bit.
J-Rod said:Eh...maybe some in run-blocking. They ranked 2nd from dead last nationally in sacks allowed. Depth is lacking...can't afford too many injuries at that position. Or most positions, really.fromolwyoming said:That said, once the injuries stopped piling up on them last season, the o-line improved quite a bit.
Wyo2dal said:J-Rod said:Eh...maybe some in run-blocking. They ranked 2nd from dead last nationally in sacks allowed. Depth is lacking...can't afford too many injuries at that position. Or most positions, really.fromolwyoming said:That said, once the injuries stopped piling up on them last season, the o-line improved quite a bit.
A lot of those sacks came before they left 7 in the box and can be blamed on a number of things not just the OL.
mwc fan said:Wyo2dal said:J-Rod said:Eh...maybe some in run-blocking. They ranked 2nd from dead last nationally in sacks allowed. Depth is lacking...can't afford too many injuries at that position. Or most positions, really.fromolwyoming said:That said, once the injuries stopped piling up on them last season, the o-line improved quite a bit.
A lot of those sacks came before they left 7 in the box and can be blamed on a number of things not just the OL.
A lot of those sacks from last year were the Qbs fault. When teams would bring seven Kolby would never throw the quick slant. In the NM game on the final play the defense blitzed and the slant was wide open. He just wasn't comfortable throwing quick timing plays.
Due to lackluster qb play, our o line looked bad at times, as you guys have pointed out. I guess the next step would be to look at run plays to determine how productive our o line was. It seemed to me that we had very few runs stopped behind the line of scrimmage. Partially, that's due to having stud running backs, but I think the big guys deserve some credit for that as well.WYCowboy said:mwc fan said:Wyo2dal said:J-Rod said:Eh...maybe some in run-blocking. They ranked 2nd from dead last nationally in sacks allowed. Depth is lacking...can't afford too many injuries at that position. Or most positions, really.fromolwyoming said:That said, once the injuries stopped piling up on them last season, the o-line improved quite a bit.
A lot of those sacks came before they left 7 in the box and can be blamed on a number of things not just the OL.
A lot of those sacks from last year were the Qbs fault. When teams would bring seven Kolby would never throw the quick slant. In the NM game on the final play the defense blitzed and the slant was wide open. He just wasn't comfortable throwing quick timing plays.
I agree with this. I don't think our OL was as bad as the stats showed.
cali2wyo said:Due to lackluster qb play, our o line looked bad at times, as you guys have pointed out. I guess the next step would be to look at run plays to determine how productive our o line was. It seemed to me that we had very few runs stopped behind the line of scrimmage. Partially, that's due to having stud running backs, but I think the big guys deserve some credit for that as well.WYCowboy said:mwc fan said:Wyo2dal said:J-Rod said:Eh...maybe some in run-blocking. They ranked 2nd from dead last nationally in sacks allowed. Depth is lacking...can't afford too many injuries at that position. Or most positions, really.fromolwyoming said:That said, once the injuries stopped piling up on them last season, the o-line improved quite a bit.
A lot of those sacks came before they left 7 in the box and can be blamed on a number of things not just the OL.
A lot of those sacks from last year were the Qbs fault. When teams would bring seven Kolby would never throw the quick slant. In the NM game on the final play the defense blitzed and the slant was wide open. He just wasn't comfortable throwing quick timing plays.
I agree with this. I don't think our OL was as bad as the stats showed.
Is there a stat that says what percentage of run plays went for zero or negative yards, excluding sacks?