ragtimejoe1
Well-known member
JimmyDimes said:.I see a 17 point loss at most.
I'd say that is a ceiling right there. Odds are that 17 points is the closest this game will be and much more likely to be double that.
JimmyDimes said:.I see a 17 point loss at most.
Depends on how the line moves. We opened at +7 against Nevada and it got bet down to +5. The opening line is simply the initial, "Here's where we think we get the money on both sides," mark. It's which side the money moves that indicates the bettors' and wise guys' feelings on the game...McPeachy said:LanderPoke said:+32? Is the this the largest underdog we've ever been? This spread is gigantic
I don't think it is the largest...I remember some larger lines (at Auburn, at Texas A&M, at Oregon) that were larger. Vegas knew something last week - probably know this week as well. Ugh.
We'll see. A lot of us fans have been picking the Pokes to lose by a lot more than they have been.ragtimejoe1 said:JimmyDimes said:.I see a 17 point loss at most.
I'd say that is a ceiling right there. Odds are that 17 points is the closest this game will be and much more likely to be double that.
JimmyDimes said:We'll see. A lot of us fans have been picking the Pokes to lose by a lot more than they have been.ragtimejoe1 said:JimmyDimes said:.I see a 17 point loss at most.
I'd say that is a ceiling right there. Odds are that 17 points is the closest this game will be and much more likely to be double that.
I've noticed a negative trend when it comes to picking Wyoming....no biggy. At least Wyoming has been covering the spread. I think the improvement is coming weekly. Much stronger D than we saw earlier in the year. We are stopping the run much better now than in the past couple years IMO. Nevada had two solid backs and we pretty much shut them down. Still need to get more pressure on the QB, but the young db's have also stepped up. Antonio Hull and CJ Jennings are going to be good cornerbacks.ragtimejoe1 said:JimmyDimes said:We'll see. A lot of us fans have been picking the Pokes to lose by a lot more than they have been.ragtimejoe1 said:JimmyDimes said:.I see a 17 point loss at most.
I'd say that is a ceiling right there. Odds are that 17 points is the closest this game will be and much more likely to be double that.
Other than the Nevada game, I haven't noticed that.
Jimmy is kicking ass at the spread prediction, so maybe he's on to something... I still don't see this one being close lolragtimejoe1 said:JimmyDimes said:.I see a 17 point loss at most.
I'd say that is a ceiling right there. Odds are that 17 points is the closest this game will be and much more likely to be double that.
cali2wyo said:Jimmy is kicking ass at the spread prediction, so maybe he's on to something... I still don't see this one being close lolragtimejoe1 said:JimmyDimes said:.I see a 17 point loss at most.
I'd say that is a ceiling right there. Odds are that 17 points is the closest this game will be and much more likely to be double that.
WyoBrandX said:I don't think the coaching will be aggressive enough to win this one. I'm not sure we have enough talent this year to win either.
Really? Pretty impressive. They sure are tough at home. Would like to see the Pokes with that kind of home field advantage, sans the clown shoe color football field.J-Rod said:Apparently Boise State hasn't given up an offensive TD at home this year. There's one goal.
SDPokeFan said:Really? Pretty impressive. They sure are tough at home. Would like to see the Pokes with that kind of home field advantage, sans the clown shoe color football field.J-Rod said:Apparently Boise State hasn't given up an offensive TD at home this year. There's one goal.
Had a similar thing with SDSU during DC's years here, where we would win in San Diego but lose at home. 4 years in a row that happened.J-Rod said:I'm curious to see how the run game looks. Hill has had a MW OPOY worthy beginning to this season. Last year UW wouldn't get the running game, or well...anything to work vs. BSU. Hill having success (100+ yards) vs. BSU would be a good sign, slumping Broncos or no slumping Broncos. That defense is still the best Wyo will have seen to this point.
Wyoming has this weird thing going where they play BSU better at Boise than in Laramie. None of the recent games are really close, but the Pokes don't get totally beaten to mush in Boise like they have at home. Weird, but that's how the series is gone. I wouldn't be shocked at all to see Wyoming cover this spread...keep it to a 35-17 type game.
Ultimately, just hope nobody gets hurt. I want to be close to 100% when CSU farts into town.
Adv8RU12 said:I'm thinking, which is worse - having the Pokes get thumped - or looking at that hideous, sickening blue field.
Maybe my TV allows a black/white option.