• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Why are public schools scared of vouchers?

I'm curios for our local pro-men in women's sports crowd, I've read here and elsewhere about it but being a problem before and how the person doesn't stand out compared to the best women, it makes me wonder, do you draw competitive lines, and if so, what are they?

If a biological male is dominating in women's sports, does that make a difference? If competitive edge doesn't matter, why does identity matter? Why have title Ix at all?
 
Thankfully the Trump administration has solved all of this gender/sex confusion for all of us. Based on his executive order, we are ALL now women! So to all my fellow women, both those with or without a penis... girl power!
 
Trump signed an executive order yesterday regarding gender ideology:

Trump EO

in it, it states:
“Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
As those in reproductive biology know, ALL embryos initially present as female before eventually developing (or not) male sex characteristics.

I get what they were going for here, but it is pretty ambiguous.
 
Trump signed an executive order yesterday regarding gender ideology:

Trump EO

in it, it states:

As those in reproductive biology know, ALL embryos initially present as female before eventually developing (or not) male sex characteristics.

I get what they were going for here, but it is pretty ambiguous.
Females don't produce embryos. There are 2 gametes: oocyte (egg) and sperm of which the oocyte is bigger.

My question is what about those that produce neither?
 
Agreed, while the gamete argument does fit most cases, it doesn't fit 100%.
For the whole topic I think there are 3 areas that are highly debatable:

1. Biological males in women's sports.
2. Someone can identify as whatever they want. Fair enough. Forcing others to pretend with them is debatable.
3. Affirming care centered on hormone therapy for minors is questionable. Even the EU medical community is not on board with this. Before is starts, Drs and parents can't agree to assist in suicide or harmful activities even if a child consents.
 
For the 3rd time, per my quote, the IBA didn't test testosterone. I've seen the article you quoted, it's ambiguous, if you look at others, including the one I linked, testosterone wasn't tested.

She has competed at multiple international events, including Olympics, and only been DQ'd from 1. If it was proven she took exogenous testosterone/steroids, then she should be disqualified, but there is zero proof that happened prior to Olympics.
Looks like you were wrong. As some of us knew.

She was a he.

 
You didn't know shit. You were letting your bigoted hate guide you. Even this article offers no real proof. Just conservative click bait.
Wrong. Again. There is proof. Biological proof. Why do you think the Khelif is quiet? Duh.


You were wrong to defend men beating up women and now you look foolish. lol. When you say it, men beating up women, it sounds kind of foolish doesn’t it? Common sense isn’t bigotry.
 
You didn't know shit. You were letting your bigoted hate guide you. Even this article offers no real proof. Just conservative click bait.
Is this right wing click bait…….

So the New Delhi lab was an American right winger? You realize your argument sounds……really ignorant.

"Chromosome analysis reveals Male karyotype. No numerical or chromosomal anomalies detected at 450-550 banding resolution," a screenshot of the document on 3 Wire Sports read. The test was at an accredited lab in New Delhi, called Dr. Lal PathLabs, before the boxing championships, according to 3 Wire Sports.

 
So to counter my accusation of conservative click bait, you post an article from....Fox News. Classic. Here's the problem. People far more intelligent than you or me in this area are involved at the Olympic level, and let Khelif compete. So you continuing to sound off as if you have a clue what you are talking about is....really ignorant.
 
So to counter my accusation of conservative click bait, you post an article from....Fox News. Classic. Here's the problem. People far more intelligent than you or me in this area are involved at the Olympic level, and let Khelif compete. So you continuing to sound off as if you have a clue what you are talking about is....really ignorant.
Smarter than the lab that tested it.

Such a dumb ignorant retort.

And attack the messenger Fox news. For reporting lab results. To the best of my knowledge, Fox News doesn’t own the lab who made the report. Do you expect CBS, PBS, MS”DNC”, to report on this when they were reporting the opposite. It’s their agenda. They aren’t going to report this. Geez.
 
So to counter my accusation of conservative click bait, you post an article from....Fox News. Classic. Here's the problem. People far more intelligent than you or me in this area are involved at the Olympic level, and let Khelif compete. So you continuing to sound off as if you have a clue what you are talking about is....really ignorant.
Now say it slowly for us all to see. I support men beating up women.
 
Smarter than the lab that tested it.

Such a dumb ignorant retort.

And attack the messenger Fox news. For reporting lab results. To the best of my knowledge, Fox News doesn’t own the lab who made the report. Do you expect CBS, PBS, MS”DNC”, to report on this when they were reporting the opposite. It’s their agenda. They aren’t going to report this. Geez.
You mean CBS wouldn't run an article like this:

And Fox reporting that article isn't their agenda? Fox News is a whole entire level of propaganda. Far more conservative than MSNBC is liberal, and that's saying something.
 
You mean CBS wouldn't run an article like this:

And Fox reporting that article isn't their agenda? Fox News is a whole entire level of propaganda. Far more conservative than MSNBC is liberal, and that's saying something.
Hmmm, must be why MS”DNC”s ratings are tanking. Because they aren’t that biased. lol, geez you’re gullible. Look at which is showing “impressive gains”. You probably supported Biden to run again a year ago. Before the debate. Before it was discovered CBS, MSdnc, CNN, ABC, PBS, NPR and NBC were all lying to us about Bidens mental decline. Many knew in 2020. So, yeah, you can be easily swayed.

 
You mean CBS wouldn't run an article like this:

And Fox reporting that article isn't their agenda? Fox News is a whole entire level of propaganda. Far more conservative than MSNBC is liberal, and that's saying something.
Well thanks for confirming my point. Look at the timeline when Fox and NYP reported the results compared to CBS 3 days ago. And now that youve posted the CBS article means you must admit……….you were wrong about Khelif. Doh……..that’ll leave a mark. Must be painful.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top