• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Who thinks Burman is any good?

You are what your record says you are. I don’t have the time, interest, or commitment to tally up the actual Burman record at UW - but my recollection-ing seems to conjure words like mediocre, crummy, meh, mid, terrible, and crappy.

He single handedly destroyed men’s basketball. Football is a net loser. Women’s basketball is fine to good. Volleyball, tennis, track, swimming - who cares but they are not burning up the record books. Wrestling is mid to slightly ok.

Apathy and acceptance of mediocrity have set in. We are going into a poo conference, where we will be among the shortest of the midgets.

We have poured several hundred million into the U - football especially - and have zilch to negative to show for it. No creativity. No imagination. No excitement. It’s time for a change but we are not likely to see one for a very long time I fear.
 
As someone else said, Burman is pretty good at kissing babies and getting money for facilities and such. But we need someone who knows sports to hire and fire coaches
 
Bear Claw said:
Simple answer to the OP’s question: nobody!

In all fairness, Burman might be one helluva guy. He just sucks as an athletic director. Foundation and fund raising seem to be in his wheelhouse.
Click to expand...
Nah man, he's a competent AD, that's evident. We're in overall good shape. He's just not excellent, and Wyoming won't be excellent with him at the helm. The University is too timid to reach for excellent as a goal, and is fine with mere competence.
 
Brew_Poke said:
Nah man, he's a competent AD, that's evident. We're in overall good shape. He's just not excellent, and Wyoming won't be excellent with him at the helm. The University is too timid to reach for excellent as a goal, and is fine with mere competence.
Click to expand...
His bball and AA reno resume' are hard to defend, but, like I said above, if he made a good hire instead of the nepotistic hire, his football resume' would good to very good.

Non-revenue sports? Clean programs, somewhat competitive, and excellent graduation rates are the main things, imo. As far as I can tell, there are few chips but not a lot else to complain about.

The other big issue is revenue diversification. Maybe too big of task, but relying on the state government, students, and a few wealthy donors are the main sources of income. Maybe that's all that's possible but we haven't increased budgets sufficiently.
 
I’m amazed at some of the love for Burman. I’m guessing some of these folks haven’t walked into the completely dead AA in a few years or haven’t looked at the difference in conference opponents from when Burman started until next year. We are officially in a Big Sky level conference don’t let the name ‘Mountain West’ confuse you.

Oh - and wow those great seats on the lower west side of the War look so nice being continually empty.
 
OrediggerPoke said:
I’m amazed at some of the love for Burman. I’m guessing some of these folks haven’t walked into the completely dead AA in a few years or haven’t looked at the difference in conference opponents from when Burman started until next year. We are officially in a Big Sky level conference don’t let the name ‘Mountain West’ confuse you.

Oh - and wow those great seats on the lower west side of the War look so nice being continually empty.
Click to expand...
Don't mistake fairness for love. I've advocated change for a long time.i also appreciate TB has had some strengths.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top