We switched roles. Damn them. :thumbdown:Wyokie said:Funny. 20 years ago Utah was putrid and now they're heading for the PAC-10.
fromolwyoming said:We switched roles. Damn them. :thumbdown:Wyokie said:Funny. 20 years ago Utah was putrid and now they're heading for the PAC-10.
True, but I was just implying the overall records, not which conferences would have picked us.Wyokie said:fromolwyoming said:We switched roles. Damn them. :thumbdown:Wyokie said:Funny. 20 years ago Utah was putrid and now they're heading for the PAC-10.
Had Wyoming had Utah's success, the Big 12 would be a better fit for us than the PAC-10 imho.
fromolwyoming said:True, but I was just implying the overall records, not which conferences would have picked us.Wyokie said:fromolwyoming said:We switched roles. Damn them. :thumbdown:Wyokie said:Funny. 20 years ago Utah was putrid and now they're heading for the PAC-10.
Had Wyoming had Utah's success, the Big 12 would be a better fit for us than the PAC-10 imho.
So, silicone valley East version?Wyokie said:fromolwyoming said:True, but I was just implying the overall records, not which conferences would have picked us.Wyokie said:fromolwyoming said:We switched roles. Damn them. :thumbdown:Wyokie said:Funny. 20 years ago Utah was putrid and now they're heading for the PAC-10.
Had Wyoming had Utah's success, the Big 12 would be a better fit for us than the PAC-10 imho.
I know exactly what your saying but still....would've been nice to see Wyoming play @ Oklahoma and @ Okie State as conference foes.
Only good thing about Oklahoma....the women are hot and a good number of them (18-32 age range) has had improvements to their bodies.
fromolwyoming said:So, silicone valley East version?Wyokie said:Only good thing about Oklahoma....the women are hot and a good number of them (18-32 age range) has had improvements to their bodies.