joshvanklomp said:
NowherePoke said:
Plus, James is a complete offensive player. There is nothing on offense that he isn't good at.
Including turning the ball over. 11 assists, 14 turnovers in 7 MW games. I don't care how many points the kid can score, that has to change!
Let's compare a few numbers shall we:
Player A: A/TO Ratio = 0.8. 17.7 PPG in 31.2 MPG, True Shooting Percentage = 55.8%
Player B: A/TO Ratio = 1.0, 18.2 PPG in 29.9 MPG, True Shooting Percentage = 55.5%
Player C: A/TO Ratio = 0.8, 14.9 PPG in 23.5 MPG, True Shooting Percentage = 57.0%
Player D: A/TO Ratio = 0.8, 14.3 PPG in 30.5 MPG, True Shooting Percentage = 55.4%
Players A, B, and D are likely MWC First Team All-MWC selections. Player C is a bench player for a 8th place team.
Player D isn't really a fair comparison as they play a different position. The other two? Both perimeter players. Should Leon Rice bench Chandler Hutchison because he has a negative A/TO Ratio? What about Neal and Elijah Brown? If James had 3 more assists over the last 7 games would he be worthy of playing time in your estimation?
I don't mean to minimize the impact of turnovers, but this UW team turns the ball over quite a bit and James is far from the main culprit. One of the things that standard stats tends to miss is the usage level of a player. KenPom tries to measure that by looking at overall possessions used (where that player has a shot, assist, turnover, etc.). This is important, because a player that is a go to option will likely have more turnovers than a role player. Someone like Larry Nance would have more raw turnovers than Derek Cooke, but if you adjust that for usage rate you would see that Cooke actually had the higher TO rate.
I bring this up to point out that according to KenPom's statistics (which are adjusted for usage, tempo, etc.), James has a TO rate that is lower than Herndon, Gorski, Kelley, Lieberman, Moemeka, Dalton, etc. Only JMac and Naughton have lower overall TO rates than James.
None of these stats are perfect of course, but any big picture look at our team would indicate that Justin James, even with the turnovers, is the most productive player on the roster. Combine that with the "eye test" and almost any impartial observer would identify as James as one of the best 2 or 3 players on the roster if not the best (which he is IMO). You would be very hard pressed to find a player with similar productivity and usage that plays so few minutes.