So now that I am sufficiently bored I will compare the two when it came down to bad losses.
Glenn:
2008: lost to BGSU (6-6) 16-45; UNM (4-8) 0-24; UNLV (5-7) 14-22
2007: SDSU (4-8) 24-27; CSU (3-9) 28-36
2006: Virginia (5-7) 12-13; Syrac (4-8) 34-40; AFA (4-8) 24-31
2005: SDSU (5-7) 21-34;
2004: BYU (5-6) 13-24; CSU (4-7) 7-30
2003: SDSU (6-6) 20-25; UNLV (6-6) 24-35
That’s 0-13 against teams with losing records you would hope we would’ve come out on top. His worst loss was to 4-7 CSU 7-30 followed by a 28-36 loss to a 3-9 CSU team. He had 6 losses to teams with 4 wins or less on the year. And most of these games we did not have key players out.
Bohl:
2017: SJSU (2-11) 17-20;
2016: UNLV (4-8) 66-69;
2015: ND 13-24; EMU (1-11) 29-48;
2014: Haw (4-9) 28-38; SJSU 20-27
That’s 0-6 in games you would have hoped we would’ve won. 2015 was a wreck with injuries to qb Cam Coffman and Josh Allen and our D was mostly Freshman. Bohl has had 5 losses to teams with 4 or less wins.
One other thing to point out between the two:
Glenn inherited a team that was 2-10 previously. But had a returning Sr qb Bramlet; a returning SR rb Armah and three top WR’s McGuffey, Floyd, Bouknight. He also had a defense that had Sr lb Gottschalk, jr lb Tuell; SR S Finn and Dixon and Hall to help his D. Plus he had a full recruiting class his first year.
Bohl inherited a backup qb who lost to Cal Poly the year before in Kierkegaard. One Sr rb Wick and and SR Wr’s Rufran and Claiborne and an up and coming So Gentry
His D had Eddie Yarbrough, Wacha, Burns and D Harris. Plus he had a short recruiting class with 18 signees and only 68 scholarship players his first year.
Just some food for thought.
To me it shows that Bohl has done more with less and while starting off bad 4-8; 2-10; he has since began to turn the tide. We’ll see what the rest of this year brings. But if it’s 6-7 wins...or more than I believe he has us on the rise.
With Glenn he took pretty close to a fully scholarshiped team and had instant success going from 2-10 the year before him to 4-8; 7-5; 6-6 and then spiraled down.
I remember a lot on here going off on Bohl and Co when we struggled thru the first two seasons saying we don’t have the talent for pro style run and that the Tampa 2 would never work. Then Bohl rights the ship with his last two years . Our O does great and then struggled last year. Our D was young and abysmal his first two years, now it’s a nationally known D. Do they still struggle? Yeah, especially with upper echelon programs. Also to top it off when players transfer or leave early to go pro it does not bode well for a program like Wyo. we have to build back up. We are not an upper echelon team like Alabama, etc that can lose players to the pros and have an equally talented backup to step up in a skilled position. As bad as our O was last year had Hill not went pro our O would not have been as bad as it was last year. With Allen leaving a year early and Garrett transferring out it left us with Nick Smith and and Frosh in Vander W. People say why is it that we are in year 5 and have this issue? There’s your answer. Bohl tried for Mich transfer Speight but UCLA beat us out. It’s the nature of the game. That said, with as many young Frosh we’ve had playing on O this year and with what I’ve seen, just from a coaches perspective, I think they will be fine. And eventually, if they stick together be a force to be reconned with in the future. Our D is senior heavy and has a lot of NFL talent. Credit to Bohl for finding gems and building them up. And I believe a lot of these younger guys on D will leave here just as talented.
We are in that mid stage of building a program. 4-8; 2-10 beginning stages. 8-6; 8-5; taste of success and upward trajectory. I believe we may have two or three years of similar winning results before we see just how good we can actually be.
Think of Bohl at NDSU. Dll and he had them at 10-1 and 10-1. Jump to FCS and he is 6-5; 3-8; 9-5 and then begins to succeed. He is at that 9-5 stage now with us. Unfortunately he has jumped another division higher and I think it will take a few more years of mid stage success before we see how great we become.