Tackling. Two touchdowns were scored because we tried to arm tackle or dive under the runner. There were lots of examples, though. Watching Texas hammer our boys with their tackles reminded me of the days when Trent Gamble used to "bring the wood" if you will on our opponents. What the heck?
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!
The only thing vs. Texas that made me yell at the TV
- Thread starter Lost Poke
- Start date
McPeachy
Well-known member
Agree...our tackling has been an issue thus far in the season.
That being said, it is of my opinion that the switch to 4-3 has taken Knapton completely out of the game. He has feen a non-factor these first 2 games, and was a major contributor last season. I can't help but think 4 LB's on the field, playing as LB's (Oliver, Gabe, Brian, Ghali / Lewis / Whomever) wouldn't be a better option for UW.
That being said, it is of my opinion that the switch to 4-3 has taken Knapton completely out of the game. He has feen a non-factor these first 2 games, and was a major contributor last season. I can't help but think 4 LB's on the field, playing as LB's (Oliver, Gabe, Brian, Ghali / Lewis / Whomever) wouldn't be a better option for UW.
Good point on Knapton. He made up a big percentage of our tackles last year.
I've been wondering about the move to 4-3. We took two great LB's, made them add 20 pounds and put them on the d-line, so we could "better fit our personnel." But if that was the case, why re-mold the players we have? What changed between head coaches that we can't recruit players for the 3-4 which worked so well for us? Or is it just that DC wants a 4-3 and will do whatever to get there?
I've been wondering about the move to 4-3. We took two great LB's, made them add 20 pounds and put them on the d-line, so we could "better fit our personnel." But if that was the case, why re-mold the players we have? What changed between head coaches that we can't recruit players for the 3-4 which worked so well for us? Or is it just that DC wants a 4-3 and will do whatever to get there?
JimmyDimes
Well-known member
I think we made the move to put our best players on the field and because it is what DC likes. We needed help on the Dline, so why not convert two linebackers. Two good linebackers, but with less speed than what we have now. But, they help the speed on our Dline. And will be great DEs with time.
I think the D looked better this week than in week #1. With increased improvement, this D could be rolling soon.
I like the move. We just need to tackle better.
Go Pokes!!!
I think the D looked better this week than in week #1. With increased improvement, this D could be rolling soon.
I like the move. We just need to tackle better.
Go Pokes!!!
Fullback41
Well-known member
i would feel better about the move if they had more sacks. i thought they could maybe get there quicker than fletcher or unrein did last year.
hopefully it will come around soon. those UT olineman can just mangle folks. i hope we are better suited to combat that 2 yrs from now.
hopefully it will come around soon. those UT olineman can just mangle folks. i hope we are better suited to combat that 2 yrs from now.
Tackling, and the pass rush, or lack thereof. I don't know if that was by design or not, but the Texas QB had all frigging day to find receivers.
Tackling is definitely the major concern though. Chris Pro needs to spend a day showing the rest of the team how to do it properly. Hitting is great, and I love to see a good pop, but we have to learn to wrap-up and quit arm tackling.
GO POKES!
Tackling is definitely the major concern though. Chris Pro needs to spend a day showing the rest of the team how to do it properly. Hitting is great, and I love to see a good pop, but we have to learn to wrap-up and quit arm tackling.
GO POKES!
mrtnt3x
Well-known member
wellpoke said:
To me it seemed like everytime they had a third down they would only rush two, both ends, and drop nine into coverage. Don't like the play call at all two ends vs 5 great lineman usually means QB sits back and picks us apart no matter whom it is. Hard to get turnovers when the QB has all day. Bring some pressure force their hands! :brick:
I guess English felt our DBs couldn't stay with their receivers in man coverage and was afraid to blitz. I'm not sure if we could or not, but we need to send them at least some of the time to keep them guessing. I'm not sure what the answer is as far as the running game goes, but we at least need to give Alexander a chance by getting him past the line of scrimmage. When he gets past the line of scrimmage, he does ok. Tackling 101 is getting your head in front of the ball carrier and wrap up - not just hitting them and expecting them to go down or laying down in front of them. I think we are learning, but the hard way - especially against good teams. I have to agree with "theman" who said the key play of the game was when we blitzed Tashaun Gipson on 3rd down and he should have had the sack but instead ran right on past the QB which would have had them punting, but instead resulted in a TD for them. One other play that was key was when Herron missed catching the very catchable pass along the sideline.
