• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Tedford didn't want the job

SnowyRange

Well-known member
Tedford didn't want the job.

So, you have a choice: either Bohl is a good hire, or he isn't.

None of this "wait and see" bullshit. Burman doesn't get the luxury of waiting to see how he does at Wyoming for 3 years before hiring him.

So...yes or no?
 
SnowyRange said:
The last report that came out was that Tedford had interest.

He didn't want the job.

But, no matter.

Bohl is the issue now. So....yes, or no?

Win press conferences and play tough? Yes

Win 4-6 games a season for 5 years? Yes as well.

Show any real progress as a football program? No.
 
SnowyRange said:
Tedford didn't want the job.

So, you have a choice: either Bohl is a good hire, or he isn't.

None of this "wait and see" bullshit. Burman doesn't get the luxury of waiting to see how he does at Wyoming for 3 years before hiring him.

So...yes or no?
Belloti said today that Tedford was interested.
 
Why are we supposed to believe you when you just make a statement with absolutely no support for it?

Just tonight we read a story by his old HC, Bellotti from Oregon that acouple of days ago that he was "very interested" in the Wyoming job....this contradicts you, so again why are we supposed to believe you?
 
Why are we supposed to believe you when you just make a statement with absolutely no support for it?

Just tonight we read a story by his old HC, Bellotti from Oregon that acouple of days ago that he was "very interested" in the Wyoming job....this contradicts you, so again why are we supposed to believe you?

I don't give a shit whether you believe me or not.

The issue now is Bohl.

Good hire, or not?
 
SnowyRange said:
Why are we supposed to believe you when you just make a statement with absolutely no support for it?

Just tonight we read a story by his old HC, Bellotti from Oregon that acouple of days ago that he was "very interested" in the Wyoming job....this contradicts you, so again why are we supposed to believe you?

I don't give a shit whether you believe me or not.

The issue now is Bohl.

Good hire, or not?
Not. But probably all that assclown Burman was capable of.
 
SnowyRange said:
Why are we supposed to believe you when you just make a statement with absolutely no support for it?

Just tonight we read a story by his old HC, Bellotti from Oregon that acouple of days ago that he was "very interested" in the Wyoming job....this contradicts you, so again why are we supposed to believe you?

I don't give a shit whether you believe me or not.

The issue now is Bohl.

Good hire, or not?

Why do you attack me when I just asked why we should believe you when you give no support for your assertion?
 
Why do you attack me when I just asked why we should believe you when you give no support for your assertion?

I find it unusual that you think a direct question is an attack.

So, I'll ask again:

Bohl. Do you think it's a good hire or not?
 
Brew_Poke said:
SnowyRange said:
Why are we supposed to believe you when you just make a statement with absolutely no support for it?

Just tonight we read a story by his old HC, Bellotti from Oregon that acouple of days ago that he was "very interested" in the Wyoming job....this contradicts you, so again why are we supposed to believe you?

I don't give a shit whether you believe me or not.

The issue now is Bohl.

Good hire, or not?
Not. But probably all that assclown Burman was capable of.
Actually im surprised burman did that well. I half thought we would end up with worse
 
HR_Poke said:
Brew_Poke said:
SnowyRange said:
Why are we supposed to believe you when you just make a statement with absolutely no support for it?

Just tonight we read a story by his old HC, Bellotti from Oregon that acouple of days ago that he was "very interested" in the Wyoming job....this contradicts you, so again why are we supposed to believe you?

I don't give a shit whether you believe me or not.

The issue now is Bohl.

Good hire, or not?
Not. But probably all that assclown Burman was capable of.
Actually im surprised burman did that well. I half thought we would end up with worse
Fuck so did I when I was hearing Sam Houston coach and Babblecock or whatever his name is.
 
Better posted here:

I wanted Tedford but I am good with Bohl. People equating him with Glenn, three things:

1. Apart from the FCS juggernauts they each built, there really isn't anything else similar about their resumes. Adding: for one thing, Glenn was never a coordinator at a big time program.

2. Just saying "he's just Glenn 2.0" is lazy and intellectually dishonest. People sure were jizzing their pants about the guy who recently left Ohio State in shame but he was also a FCS juggernaut. For every FCS guy who bombs out at the FBS level there's a guy who succeeds. Each one should be evaluated on their own merits.

3. Literally every journalist who is covering the coaching carousel says this is a home run and are echoing the same sentiment from the coaching community. Think about that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top