• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Tashaun Gipson

BeaverPoke said:
If we really want to get an objective look at this, why don't we look at more teams. Instead of just the Browns.
And we should wait until opening week rosters are made. There are going to be 53 players on each team, and the Alvester Alexanders of the non-BCS will surely be cut and put to the practice squads.

So, when there are 53 players, on 32 teams, let's count up the amount of players that come from BCS schools.

Too busy. Can't. ;)
 
BeaverPoke said:
If we really want to get an objective look at this, why don't we look at more teams. Instead of just the Browns.
And we should wait until opening week rosters are made. There are going to be 53 players on each team, and the Alvester Alexanders of the non-BCS will surely be cut and put to the practice squads.

So, when there are 53 players, on 32 teams, let's count up the amount of players that come from BCS schools.

I like this idea quite a bit actually, I'll help compile the data on that I'm kind of curious as well.
 
Wyo2dal said:
BeaverPoke said:
If we really want to get an objective look at this, why don't we look at more teams. Instead of just the Browns.
And we should wait until opening week rosters are made. There are going to be 53 players on each team, and the Alvester Alexanders of the non-BCS will surely be cut and put to the practice squads.

So, when there are 53 players, on 32 teams, let's count up the amount of players that come from BCS schools.

I like this idea quite a bit actually, I'll help compile the data on that I'm kind of curious as well.

I think there are going to be a lot of players from non-power teams in power conferences (Ga.Tech, K-State, Ole Miss, Washington, etc.)
 
Here is a good site for determining NFL representation by school:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/college" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
I just told you the non-BCS makes up 37% if BCS makes up 50% and all other divisions make up 17%. So FBS is more important than being P5 by a long fucking shot.
 
laxwyo said:
I just told you the non-BCS makes up 37% if BCS makes up 50% and all other divisions make up 17%. So FBS is more important than being P5 by a long fucking shot.


And that was based off the Browns preseason roster which has yet to be cut to 53.

So...the numbers aren't totally accurate.

And not to mention, the debate wasn't BCS vs everyone else.
It was BCS vs rest of FBS.

Also...37+50+17=104 :cool:
 
Back
Top