The other board I saw is saying that on Sportszone that there is absolutely no way that Gillespie will get the job at UW. There were a couple of comments after that where it was said Shyatt was probable or even a couple people said that Burman very well might be looking at a "huh?" hire or a "WTF" hire.
I know this is all speculation but from what I have read all over the place, I think I am safe in saying that most everybody would like to see Gillespie hired. "Do what it takes and get him hired." I would agree with this.
Now, I guess that I am in the minority when it comes to Shyatt. Yep, he left to go to "his" school after 1 year and did alright when he was here but I still have a problem with it. I guess I hold grudges more than most and if you leave my school to go to your's and it doesn't work out.... I don't want you back at mine. I hate that we would be his "fall-back" plan even after this many years. Some might like him but I don't.
Now to Burman. Tom, if you are reading this and I doubt you are, your job absolutely is riding on your hire. Your hire ABSOLUTELY has to do 2 things:
1). Even after Tom fired Schroyer and the kids have obviously increased their effort level on the court, the #9 team in the nation came into the AA and the "reported" attendance was only 4,518. This tells me that the Wyoming people still are very upset and your hire HAS TO GET EXCITEMENT BACK! Hiring an asst from some other school or a no-name will not bring that immediate excitement and this WILL cost you your job in my opinion. You have to get butts in the seats of the AA so you better make a splash!!!
2). You have absolutely no room for error and saying that this team will be pretty tough in the next 3 or 4 years will not fly! You have to bring in a coach that is going to WIN NOW. No exceptions. Alot of pressure?? Yep! But none the less, mandatory.
These are just a few of my thoughts, I might be wrong but I think the pressure is on Burman.
I know this is all speculation but from what I have read all over the place, I think I am safe in saying that most everybody would like to see Gillespie hired. "Do what it takes and get him hired." I would agree with this.
Now, I guess that I am in the minority when it comes to Shyatt. Yep, he left to go to "his" school after 1 year and did alright when he was here but I still have a problem with it. I guess I hold grudges more than most and if you leave my school to go to your's and it doesn't work out.... I don't want you back at mine. I hate that we would be his "fall-back" plan even after this many years. Some might like him but I don't.
Now to Burman. Tom, if you are reading this and I doubt you are, your job absolutely is riding on your hire. Your hire ABSOLUTELY has to do 2 things:
1). Even after Tom fired Schroyer and the kids have obviously increased their effort level on the court, the #9 team in the nation came into the AA and the "reported" attendance was only 4,518. This tells me that the Wyoming people still are very upset and your hire HAS TO GET EXCITEMENT BACK! Hiring an asst from some other school or a no-name will not bring that immediate excitement and this WILL cost you your job in my opinion. You have to get butts in the seats of the AA so you better make a splash!!!
2). You have absolutely no room for error and saying that this team will be pretty tough in the next 3 or 4 years will not fly! You have to bring in a coach that is going to WIN NOW. No exceptions. Alot of pressure?? Yep! But none the less, mandatory.
These are just a few of my thoughts, I might be wrong but I think the pressure is on Burman.