SnowyRange
Well-known member
http://www.wyosports.net/university_of_wyoming/football/uw-must-wait-for-bowl-but-planning-in-works/article_bac91c70-a7d7-11e6-85bf-5300ec80dbae.html
SnowyRange said:http://www.wyosports.net/university_of_wyoming/football/uw-must-wait-for-bowl-but-planning-in-works/article_bac91c70-a7d7-11e6-85bf-5300ec80dbae.html
If UW plays in this game, and it’s on the road, the MW takes care of all the expenses
so basically hawaii hosting a conf championship would damn near bankrupt the mw
SnowyRange said:so basically hawaii hosting a conf championship would damn near bankrupt the mw
Or Hawaii just being in a conference championship, I guess.
Also, I was surprised we made even the pittances we did in the NM bowls. The majority of bowls are poor/losing propositions for schools, for the reasons touched upon in the article.
trump could relax some regulations on mining and using coal.......but i doubt it would do much if any good at this pointAdv8RU12 said:About money. Is Trump going to reinstate coal, making it a viable revenue source for Wyoming (and thus the university)?
if we only netted 10k at the last bowl.......how much did it cost temple?
About money. Is Trump going to reinstate coal
Adv8RU12 said:About money. Is Trump going to reinstate coal, making it a viable revenue source for Wyoming (and thus the university)?
unless the epa bans frackingOrediggerPoke said:Adv8RU12 said:About money. Is Trump going to reinstate coal, making it a viable revenue source for Wyoming (and thus the university)?
Huh? What is 'reinstating' coal?
In order to make coal a more viable revenue source that would encourage companies to ramp up production, natural gas prices would need to increase significantly thus increasing the demand and price for coal. I, personally, don't see that happening with the abundance of East coast shale supply and the ability of natural gas producers to turn profits at $3.50/mcf.
whyoh said:unless the epa bans frackingOrediggerPoke said:In order to make coal a more viable revenue source that would encourage companies to ramp up production, natural gas prices would need to increase significantly thus increasing the demand and price for coal. I, personally, don't see that happening with the abundance of East coast shale supply and the ability of natural gas producers to turn profits at $3.50/mcf.
not saying i would agree with it, but that would definitely change the supply/demand balance
The bigger issue with coal is the EPA standards coal fired power plants have to meet in around 2018 (possibly sooner). Many can't meet the standards, such as the Carbon Pacificorp plant in Helper, UT. It can't meet the standards and is forced to shut down. The number is about 20% nationwide won't meet the new standards.Adv8RU12 said:About money. Is Trump going to reinstate coal, making it a viable revenue source for Wyoming (and thus the university)?
Poke-proud said:The bigger issue with coal is the EPA standards coal fired power plants have to meet in around 2018 (possibly sooner). Many can't meet the standards, such as the Carbon Pacificorp plant in Helper, UT. It can't meet the standards and is forced to shut down. The number is about 20% nationwide won't meet the new standards.Adv8RU12 said:About money. Is Trump going to reinstate coal, making it a viable revenue source for Wyoming (and thus the university)?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fine with me if it does. Historically I've not seen too many regulations relaxed, maybe this will be a first.elfletcho said:Poke-proud said:The bigger issue with coal is the EPA standards coal fired power plants have to meet in around 2018 (possibly sooner). Many can't meet the standards, such as the Carbon Pacificorp plant in Helper, UT. It can't meet the standards and is forced to shut down. The number is about 20% nationwide won't meet the new standards.Adv8RU12 said:About money. Is Trump going to reinstate coal, making it a viable revenue source for Wyoming (and thus the university)?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah the Clean Power Plan will be the first thing to go. Those standards are gone. This guy will be the next head of the EPA:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ng-on-to-unravel-obamas-environmental-legacy/
EPA career employee response
http://www.eenews.net/stories/1060045642
Asmodeanreborn said:Regardless of what happens with regulations, I think it'd be wise for Wyoming to try hard to diversify their economy. Yes, coal will be around for another 20 years, but it's likely it'll keep shrinking, especially with dying international demand and with alternate power sources declining in cost rapidly. Hell, even solar is dropping at a steady 12% per year as both battery and solar cells keep improving and getting cheaper.
Question is - exactly what should Wyoming try to get into?