• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your WyoNation.com experience today!

Season Statistics

WyoBrandX

Well-known member
Sorry to completely trash this thread, but I have reworked this entire setup. Please take a look and let me know if you see any errors. If you see anything you want added, send me a PM and I'll add it.
 
Man, the Nebraska game sure came close, but how awesome is it that we've had 300 yards of offense in every single game this season?

Also, you flipped the Nebraska score around and looks like you counted Nebraska's score into our offensive average.
 
Offense: Touchdown Comparison - 2003 to 2011.
2011 is not complete, for obvious reasons
offense-td.png


Offense: Fieldgoal Comparison - 2003 to 2011
offense-fg.png


Offense: Total Yards - 2003 to 2011
offense-total-yards.png



Offense: Points - 2003 to 2011
offense-points.png



Offense: Passing Yards - 2003 to 2011
offense-passing.png



Offense: Rushing Yards - 2003 to 2011
offense-rushing.png
 
wyosteelerfan said:
oh man, what i wouldn't give for that 2006 defense again

If the 2011 offense stays on track for 5k yards, and you could take that 2006 defense, we could be a 0-1 loss team this year. Of course this would never happen but its cool to think about.
 
wyobrandon said:
wyosteelerfan said:
oh man, what i wouldn't give for that 2006 defense again

If the 2011 offense stays on track for 5k yards, and you could take that 2006 defense, we could be a 0-1 loss team this year. Of course this would never happen but its cool to think about.
Even better. 1996 offense with the 2006 defense. We'd be 7-0 at this point.
 
fromolwyoming said:
wyobrandon said:
wyosteelerfan said:
oh man, what i wouldn't give for that 2006 defense again

If the 2011 offense stays on track for 5k yards, and you could take that 2006 defense, we could be a 0-1 loss team this year. Of course this would never happen but its cool to think about.
Even better. 1996 offense with the 2006 defense. We'd be 7-0 at this point.

1996 Offense with the 1996 Defense was 7-0 at this point.
 
MrTitleist said:
You're gettin' pretty good at those perl scripts, Brandon. :thumb:

That's a scary comment to make. The worst thing you can ever believe is that you're good at Perl - it pretty much means you're about to completely and irrevocably destroy something people have spent years developing/creating/collecting.

Perl is a powerful tool, but the moment you believe you're in full control of it, you're inviting quick and thorough doom upon yourself and the people around you.
 
Only if you set out for evil. Brandon uses his scripts to rip info off of pages then compile them into Excel. However, once he starts ripping posts and compiling them into a DB, I'm gonna have to change his handle to East Popcorn.
 
At the moment, this is all manually generated. I'm wrapping my head around the statistics and where i make the most mistakes with the statistics. Up next, I do plan on building a parser to place all of the historical statistics into a database back end. I'll have to build another parser to get the incremental. As soon as the data is organised, then we'll have some fun. I'm thinking catalyst. Of course, if I'm board I could do this in Java. I don't have enough hair left to write the thing in C.
 
MrTitleist said:
Only if you set out for evil. Brandon uses his scripts to rip info off of pages then compile them into Excel. However, once he starts ripping posts and compiling them into a DB, I'm gonna have to change his handle to East Popcorn.

East Popcorn my ass. At the very most West Popcorn. Like Chris LeDoux, I gotta be where I can see those Rocky Mountains, ride my horse, and see an eagle fly.
 
wyobrandon said:
At the moment, this is all manually generated. I'm wrapping my head around the statistics and where i make the most mistakes with the statistics. Up next, I do plan on building a parser to place all of the historical statistics into a database back end. I'll have to build another parser to get the incremental. As soon as the data is organised, then we'll have some fun. I'm thinking catalyst. Of course, if I'm board I could do this in Java. I don't have enough hair left to write the thing in C.

Why would you have to build another parser for the incremental data? Shouldn't it come in the same format?
 
wyobrandon said:
At the moment, this is all manually generated. I'm wrapping my head around the statistics and where i make the most mistakes with the statistics. Up next, I do plan on building a parser to place all of the historical statistics into a database back end. I'll have to build another parser to get the incremental. As soon as the data is organised, then we'll have some fun. I'm thinking catalyst. Of course, if I'm board I could do this in Java. I don't have enough hair left to write the thing in C.
saupload_towelie.jpg
 
Asmodeanreborn said:
wyobrandon said:
At the moment, this is all manually generated. I'm wrapping my head around the statistics and where i make the most mistakes with the statistics. Up next, I do plan on building a parser to place all of the historical statistics into a database back end. I'll have to build another parser to get the incremental. As soon as the data is organised, then we'll have some fun. I'm thinking catalyst. Of course, if I'm board I could do this in Java. I don't have enough hair left to write the thing in C.

Why would you have to build another parser for the incremental data? Shouldn't it come in the same format?

You would think. But so far I have found about 3 different formats that the MWC stores them in. Of course its in HTML, so its probably going to be some regexps, while loops and counters to try to figure out where something stops and others start. The 2003 stats are ancient (perl was probably popular in 2003 :) ).

I might just build a preparser to try to format it the way I would expect and use one to take that data and place it into a db. I'm not sure, I just haven't gotten that far. But suffice to say, I will get my hands on the data!!!
 
wyobrandon said:
You would think. But so far I have found about 3 different formats that the MWC stores them in. Of course its in HTML, so its probably going to be some regexps, while loops and counters to try to figure out where something stops and others start. The 2003 stats are ancient (perl was probably popular in 2003 :) ).

I might just build a preparser to try to format it the way I would expect and use one to take that data and place it into a db. I'm not sure, I just haven't gotten that far. But suffice to say, I will get my hands on the data!!!

Ouch, good luck on parsing the HTML. In all technicality, it's an impossible task, though I guess for a very limited set of data it might not be all that bad.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top