LanderPoke
Well-known member
What a joke. This is inexcusable by everyone. Players need to have some pride and coaches need to actually put people close to the dang rim to rebound. EMBARRASSING. PATHETIC
Adv8RU12 said:But you have to admit, the Pokes are very fast at one phase - getting to the other side of the court as soon as the ball leaves the hands of a Poke taking a shot.
Adv8RU12 said:Not putting Naughton against their big guy, who was pushing the skinnies (Dalton and Herndon) around at will, I think contributed a lot to them getting inside and also getting the rebounds.
TSpoke said:Adv8RU12 said:Not putting Naughton against their big guy, who was pushing the skinnies (Dalton and Herndon) around at will, I think contributed a lot to them getting inside and also getting the rebounds.
I also thought we should have given him a shot in there but NAughton hasn't been very impressive in any of his minutes so they probably don't have enough faith in him to put him in the game.
No trying to to claim there wasn't a rebounding issue but as I mentioned in another thread, between the number of turnovers they had and the amount of shots we missed they had many more opportunities to get Dreb than we did which contributed to the rebounding discrepancy. We had the same number of offensive rebounds that they did(they had fewer misses than us so they had a better offreb %). I don't think the rebounding numbers are quite as bad as they look(but the aren't good)
NowherePoke said:TSpoke said:Adv8RU12 said:Not putting Naughton against their big guy, who was pushing the skinnies (Dalton and Herndon) around at will, I think contributed a lot to them getting inside and also getting the rebounds.
I also thought we should have given him a shot in there but NAughton hasn't been very impressive in any of his minutes so they probably don't have enough faith in him to put him in the game.
No trying to to claim there wasn't a rebounding issue but as I mentioned in another thread, between the number of turnovers they had and the amount of shots we missed they had many more opportunities to get Dreb than we did which contributed to the rebounding discrepancy. We had the same number of offensive rebounds that they did(they had fewer misses than us so they had a better offreb %). I don't think the rebounding numbers are quite as bad as they look(but the aren't good)
Our low OReb% is of course due largely to our strategic aversion to pursuing them. Instead, we try to get back and prevent transition buckets.
That's good in theory, but if you don't defend in the half court anyway (DU had a True Shooting Percentage of 67% last night), I can't really understand the decision.
If we are going to go with the "defense is optional" strategy, we should try to maximize our offensive opportunities.