He does "okay" when he goes outside of the UW connections and just follows what the service or guy with the most success at the Big Sky school is. It's when it gets involved with the coach having a previous connection or existing connection with UW that is a disaster. Bohl, Shyatt, Linder, CHristensen being "okay". When these guys are already assistants or previous assistants at UW it's been a disaster --- Edwards, Schroyer, Sawvel. He seems to be to easily swayed by the prior coaches recomendation, which is inherently biased. You would think he would have a better idea of these former assistants given that they are in the same facilities that he is. For example when Dabo Swinney was hired at Clemson, the then AD a guy by the name of Phillips said he used to walk by the offices of the assistant coaches or go into the offices and he could see how the players just radiated toward Swinney, they were all in his office and he knew Swinney could connect with the kids better than anybody else. Burman has not shown to have been able to provide that sort of incite or sense of how players are reacting to assistant coaches and how these guys would do as head coaches.