NO RESPECT FROM ESPN

[dapokes]

Unreal. I just read this today from some assclown writer for ESPN 'insider'...

I hope this gets to DC. Blatant disrespect by ESPN.

"Gildan New Mexico Bowl: Temple Owls (minus-7) vs. Wyoming Cowboys, Dec. 17: We like this Wyoming team, but the Cowboys are outclassed at the line of scrimmage in this one. The rush defense is not equipped to handle Bernard Pierce and the Owls' physical attack, while the offense is missing its best rusher and receiver. Temple will chew up yards and clock, leveraging its superior special teams, massive offensive line and talented, experienced defensive front seven to control the game.
Temple 42, Wyoming 17"

 

[seattlecowboy]

Unreal. I just read this today from some assclown writer for ESPN 'insider'...

I hope this gets to DC. Blatant disrespect by ESPN.

"Gildan New Mexico Bowl: Temple Owls (minus-7) vs. Wyoming Cowboys, Dec. 17: We like this Wyoming team, but the Cowboys are outclassed at the line of scrimmage in this one. The rush defense is not equipped to handle Bernard Pierce and the Owls' physical attack, while the offense is missing its best rusher and receiver. Temple will chew up yards and clock, leveraging its superior special teams, massive offensive line and talented, experienced defensive front seven to control the game.
Temple 42, Wyoming 17"

I wouldn't worry too much about it as the writer doesn't seem to know much since he says that our leading rusher is out of the game. He is basically copying what everyone else is saying. All they can come up with is that fact that Temple runs the ball and Wyoming has a bad rush defense. Wyoming has given up rushing yards all year and still won games.

 

[COS Cowboy]

Respect from ESPN? That's a laugher, they don't even cover our conference. We're just non-AQ trash to them. That writer didn't even bother to research his story properly. Our leading rusher isn't hurt.

 

[J-Rod]

ESPN was right for the first time this year.

 

[dapokes]

I'll stop complaining. That was embarrassing