WYO1016 said:A few of you will be happy to see that there are 9 Wyoming kids on the depth chart, and that's before the incoming freshman class.
Yet none of them are scholarshipped....I don't think?
WYO1016 said:A few of you will be happy to see that there are 9 Wyoming kids on the depth chart, and that's before the incoming freshman class.
J-Rod said:http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/cowboys/wyoming-announces-first-spring-depth-chart/article_e1ba866c-d4ff-505c-9678-e0199d956c64.html
Observations: May listed ahead of Wick....Appleby ahead of Olive. Mauldhart and Claiborne listed as only two starting WRs.....a lot of CDC slot-type WRs getting buried on the depth chart. TE looks thin, but nothing unexpected.
That is surprising....but must mean Chase is a pretty decent player and our depth is getting better.PotatoCreekPete said:J-Rod said:http://trib.com/news/opinion/blogs/cowboys/wyoming-announces-first-spring-depth-chart/article_e1ba866c-d4ff-505c-9678-e0199d956c64.html
Observations: May listed ahead of Wick....Appleby ahead of Olive. Mauldhart and Claiborne listed as only two starting WRs.....a lot of CDC slot-type WRs getting buried on the depth chart. TE looks thin, but nothing unexpected.
My take is that 2014 offensively speaking will be a pretty much basic package that we will see. Wyoming will try to overpower with the running game and put in the passing game to keep defenses honest. I like the running backs that we have and I like the WR's that we have but it is going to take a while for the new offense to gel.
Defensively speaking, this is where I think that we can and will shine. I really like this defense and depth that I am seeing. Will this be a championship season? Probably not, but I do feel that Wyoming has a chance to get to a bowl but it will all hinge on the defense. Just got to make sure that the offense helps the defense instead of hurts it as it has for the last several years.
My big surprised from the first depth chart? Appleby in front of Olive.
As Bohl said this depth chart is very fluid right now, or in other words the names are written down in pencil and there is a big eraser in the coaches pocket. For one I think that the depth chart at the first game against Montana will be somewhat different than the one we are seeing today. I agree with the statement that some of the stuff is put down to motivate some guys and to get them to "up" their game.
I don't believe any of them are, but it's nice to see that they're getting a shot. They're all getting the Hathaway, which I would think would be a tool that the coaching staff uses to free up scholarships. Regardless of athletic scholarship status, these guys are getting a shot. None of them are very high up on the chart, but they are definitely getting reps and getting an opportunity to show what they can do.Slow Hand said:WYO1016 said:A few of you will be happy to see that there are 9 Wyoming kids on the depth chart, and that's before the incoming freshman class.
Yet none of them are scholarshipped....I don't think?
I believe that May was the clear cut starter before he got hurt last season. Considering what we saw from Wick last season, May must be killing it.fromolwyoming said:And last year, before he went down for the season, May was competing neck and neck with Wick for the RB position.
Its good news....means the depth is solid. And Uso is no longer comfortable....he'll work his ass off this summer.JimmyDimes said:That is surprising....but must mean Chase is a pretty decent player and our depth is getting better.
McPeachy said:... we may not see positive results in the W/L column for 3 or so years.
He would have found more QBs, RBs, and WRs....but would have continued the same gig....bowl game when he's lucky, 3-9 the other three times he doesn't in that four years.Adv8RU12 said:Yes, but would you agree that with Dave at the helm it probably would have been much worse?
To be fair to Dave.....he only finished 3-9 once.......2 bowls in 5 years. And I like to think we were unlucky with Dave more often than we were lucky.J-Rod said:He would have found more QBs, RBs, and WRs....but would have continued the same gig....bowl game when he's lucky, 3-9 the other three times he doesn't in that four years.Adv8RU12 said:Yes, but would you agree that with Dave at the helm it probably would have been much worse?
Fair enough....either way, the only consistent with Dave is that he would have been inconsistent.JimmyDimes said:To be fair to Dave.....he only finished 3-9 once.......2 bowls in 5 years. And I like to think we were unlucky with Dave more often than we were lucky.
Peace,
Make that 2. He never made any adjustments, at all.J-Rod said:Fair enough....either way, the only consistent with Dave is that he would have been inconsistent.JimmyDimes said:To be fair to Dave.....he only finished 3-9 once.......2 bowls in 5 years. And I like to think we were unlucky with Dave more often than we were lucky.
Peace,
Adv8RU12 said:McPeachy said:... we may not see positive results in the W/L column for 3 or so years.
Yes, but would you agree that with Dave at the helm it probably would have been much worse?
WYO1016 said:I believe that May was the clear cut starter before he got hurt last season. Considering what we saw from Wick last season, May must be killing it.fromolwyoming said:And last year, before he went down for the season, May was competing neck and neck with Wick for the RB position.