Brew_Poke
Well-known member
307bball said:Wyovanian said:There's something almost paradoxical in all of this. Burman seems to walk on eggshells with his coaches, afraid of losing them and afraid he can't replace them. The fact is, when you stop holding people accountable, you lose ANY semblance of control.
Then, the transfer portal rolls around and the coaches lose players wholesale, seemingly because they're overly aggressive "hard asses" when it comes to accountability. The fact is, as a leader, you also have to recognize when someone has leverage and learn to work with that.
Seems to me, from the top down, there's been no great example of the art of management and leadership. ALL good managers begin with core values and develop an aspirational vision, then , through the practices of communication, control, planning, organization, staffing, and leadership they DIRECT whatever enterprise they're charged with. As times change (along with leverage) one must adapt and re-balance their approach. "Control" is often more of a result than a practice, especially in this day and age of very shallow workforces and the transfer portal.
Like you said, the fish usually rots from the head down.
Your not wrong but how does that translate to the two high profile sports at UW...men's basketball and football? Linder was still a slam dunk hire .... I know people rag on Bohl but he's very respected and has kept us out of the conference basement. Should Burman be threatening their contracts? What is Burman...or forget Burman...what is the best AD supposed to do? and, more importantly, how much of it should be visible to us fans?
It doesn't matter, because the fans/supporters/big boosters don't really care about the success....It's all just some big rancher flex thing social club they have going on, and they're content. Don't expect the state of the Athletics Department to change if the core people they are focused on keeping happy remain docile, imbecilic, and ignorant of the state of major college athletics.