VisorHair said:
kansasCowboy said:
If we do seats, especially wider seats then we need to add end zone seating. I'm sick of losing capacity. We're already under 30,000 (29,181) from a stadium that once proudly held 33,500 ( a respectable number). We need to stay at or around 30,000. We used to scoff at USU for having a stadium at 25,000.
I just think of the record crowds we could've had, had we not lost seating. Virginia, Texas, Boise and Nebraska to name a few. Our sellout crowds of 30 and 31,000 could have easily surpassed our current record of 34,745 in 97 with CSU. Those games could've been 35,000+.
I do think it would be nice to have an "area" with seating, where those who prefer to sit the entire game can. I'm sick of people telling me to sit down. I, like most sit during change of possessions and before kickoffs and in between quarters or halves, otherwise we stand.
Why would we expand if we can't fill as it stands? 7k average or something from Oct - December I believe.. The sell-outs you listed above are once a year!
That is not expanding. That would keep it where it is with the amount of seating you would lose bringing in chairs.
I for one would not be proud to say I was at a sellout crowd of 25,000.
The smaller we make our stadium, the smaller we cap ourselves off at being called mediocre. Shoot, USU has had two good years in 20 years and they are talking about expanding. I, for one do not wish to be known as the smallest stadium in the conference. Or even in the FBS! I would also like to know that we didn't drop our capacity down to that of your top FCS programs. But that's just me.
When we win consistently people come, attendance rises and I would like to know, when that day comes again ( and it will) that we didn't shoot ourselves in the foot with small time thinking. What do I mean by that? No matter how good we are and how well we do winning on a consistent basis, you will never be getting looked at by top recruits when they see that even there biggest game at home would only be 25,000. Kids want to be seen.
We've had several seasons where we avged 24 to 25,000 and then had one or two games due to weather (8 to 12,000) that caused us to drop our season total average back down to 20 to 22,000.
My point is, if you are going to take seating away somewhere in the stadium, replaces it somewhere else and keep our capacity up. This is not expanding, it is equalizing.
30,000 is a good marker. Anything less and you're putting your name in with Western Kentucky, Buffalo, FAU, FIU and Idaho and pretty much every MAC school.
Just in our conference, AFA has dropped from 52,123 to 46,900. (Still a respectable number)
BSU has expanded from 30,000 to 37,000. CSU has dropped from 34,500 to 32,500. Fresno has maintained at 41,031. Hawaii has maintained at 50,000. Nevada has maintained at 30,000 ( even in their erector set of a stadium). New Mex expanded from 30,118 to 38,600. SJSU has maintained at 31,127. SDSU has rented out more sections of Qualcomm Stadium going from 32,000 to 40 to 45,000. UNLV has expanded from 32,000 to 36,800 ( mostly due to its Bowl game). USU has maintained at 25,513 and are looking to expand. WYO has dropped from 33,500 to 29,181 and with what everyone is saying we should drop some more...Despicable! Out of the three schools to drop capacity ours already sticks out the most. So let's make it worse, why don't we!?